Ricardo Stein et al. Rodrigo Otávio Bougleux Alô Luiz Eduardo Fonteles Ritt Alexsandro Alves Fagundes … Anderson Donelli da Silveira Artur Haddad Herdy Clea Colombo Cristiano Faria Pisani Fabrício Braga Frank Nunes Luciana Sacilotto Marconi Gomes Silva Mauricio Milani Mauricio Pimentel Milena dos Santos Barros Campos Nágela Simão Vinhosa Nunes Pablo Marino Nascimento Susimeire Buglia José Ronyeryson dos Santos Evangelista Filipe Ferrari Leonardo Castro Luna
Abstract
Background
Although historically discouraged due to the risk of arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD), physical exercise (PE) may be safe and beneficial for individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
Objective
To evaluate the association between PE and the incidence of mortality and arrhythmic events in adults with HCM, stratifying the analysis according to different types and intensities of exercise.
Methods
Systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies identified in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through December 2024. Studies including individuals exposed to different intensities of PE were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools, and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Recommendations were developed by an expert panel of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology.
Results
Eight studies (four RCTs and four observational studies; 9,744 participants) were included. None reported an increased risk of mortality or severe arrhythmic events associated with PE, even at moderate or vigorous intensities. Syncope was rare. Additionally, a Korean observational study involving more than 7,000 participants (mean age: 59 years) demonstrated reduced all-cause mortality with higher physical activity intensity (dose–response curve). In low-risk athletes, competitive sports were not associated with severe adverse events. The quality of evidence ranged from moderate to very low.
Conclusion
PE in HCM should be encouraged based on individualized assessment. In patients without high-risk criteria for SCD, benefits appear to outweigh risks. For higher-risk subgroups, recommendations are more cautious and based on expert consensus.