Patient Care Team – ABC CARDIOL

ABC

Original Article

Potentially Inappropriate Cardioverter Defibrillator Implants in Secondary Prevention of Death

William Neves de Carvalho et al. Tainá Teixeira Viana Clara Salles Figueiredo Fernanda Martins Luiz Carlos Santana Passos

Abstract

Background:

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are recommended for patients experiencing malignant tachyarrhythmias due to irreversible causes, who are clinically stable, and have a life expectancy exceeding one year. However, adverse socioeconomic and psychosocial conditions can adversely affect short-term survival and may render implantation inappropriate.

Objective:

To assess whether economic and psychosocial markers (EPSM) are associated with higher mortality in the first year (indicating potentially inappropriate implants) following ICD implantation.

Methods:

A prospective cohort study conducted between 2017 and 2021 included patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% who underwent ICD implantation for secondary prophylaxis. Prior to the procedure, patients were evaluated by an MDT, which examined four EPSM variables, namely socioeconomic vulnerability, self-care capacity, pharmacological adherence, and mood disorders. The participants were monitored for at least 12 months. Statistical significance was considered to be p-values < 0.05.

Results:

A total of 208 individuals were included, with 144 (68.9%) being male. The mean LVEF was 32% ±9 and 107 (51%) had Chagas disease etiology. The mortality rate in the first year was 54/208 (25.8%). All patients who died had at least one of the EPSM and there no deaths were reported among the 73 (35.4%) who did not have EPSM. In multivariate analysis, having EPSM and LVEF were the only independent predictors of mortality under 1 year: RR 20.48 (2.75 – 52.29); p=0.003 and RR 0.97 (0.93 – 0.99); p=0.047, respectively.

Conclusion:

Socioeconomic and psychosocial conditions should be identified and, where possible, resolved before implantation, as they may make device implantation a potentially inappropriate procedure.

Read Full Article

IJCS

Original Article

Interdisciplinary Group Intervention on Nutritional Profile, Quality of Life, and Stress During Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Giana de Freitas Rodrigues et al. Daniela da Rosa Vieira Patrícia Pereira Ruschel Cynthia Seelig … Christian Coronel Sandra Mari Barbiero

Abstract

Background:

Participating in therapeutic operative groups with nutritional and psychological interventions might influence the recovery of patients in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation programs.

Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness of group interventions on the nutritional profile, stress, and quality of life of patients in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.

Methods:

In this randomized clinical trial, adult patients of the Cardiopulmonary and Metabolic Rehabilitation (CPMR) unit were randomized into control group (CG), receiving standard follow-up assessment by the CPMR unit, and intervention group (IG), which additionally participated in 6 meetings of an interdisciplinary group with a nutritionist and a psychologist. Anthropometric data and results from a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), Lipp’s Inventory of Stress Symptoms for Adults (ISSL), and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were analyzed. Student’s t-tests, Generalized Estimation Equations (GEE), Mann-Whitney tests, and Bonferroni tests were used for statistical analyses, with a significance level of 5%.

Results:

The sample consisted of 76 patients: 31 in the IG (64±9.2 years old) and 45 in the CG (61.4±11.8 years old). There was a significant reduction (p<0.001) in weight, body mass index, and waist circumference, and an increase (p=0.010) in the consumption of healthy food only in the IG. The consumption of unhealthy food was reduced in both groups (p<0.001), the physical aspect of quality of life improved (p=0.018), and women presented better physical (p=0.011) and mental results (p=0.008).

Conclusions:

This group intervention was effective regarding the nutritional status of patients in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. The physical aspect of quality of life showed improvements in both groups.

Read Full Article

ABC

Editorial

Heart Rate Control in Heart Failure

Mariana Janini Gomes et al. Luana Urbano Pagan

Heart failure (HF) is an important public health issue due to its high prevalence and the severity of clinical manifestations.^, The increment in population longevity has increased the number of hospitalizations and deaths due to HF. Recent data by DATASUS (2020) show the occurrence of 26,482 deaths from HF.

This syndrome has a multifactorial characteristic and its treatment requires a multidisciplinary team to meet the recommendations proposed in the guidelines for the treatment of HF. Follow-up and monitoring of patients are essential for improving the clinical outcomes.^–

[…]

Read Full Article

IJCS

Letter to the Editor

Effectiveness of Rapid Response Teams and the Importance of Preprints

Hermano Alexandre Lima Rocha et al. Sabrina Gabriele Maia Oliveira Rocha Antônia Célia de Castro Alcântara

To the Editor of the International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences,

We have read with interest the Point of View: “Performance of the Rapid Response Systems in Health Care Improvement: Benefits and Perspectives” by Viviane Cordeiro Veiga and Salomón Soriano Ordinola Rojas, published ahead of print in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences on April 15, 2019. Rapid response teams to treat trauma patients in Australia 30 years ago, in 1989. From the outset, the aim was to early recognize signs of deterioration and provide a quick response, hence the name of the methodology. The discussion about the activation criteria is relevant and up to date and was treated in a solid manner by the authors in the introduction of the point of view. Indeed, it is known that this is the cause of part of the heterogeneity of results found in studies on the subject.

[…]

Read Full Article

IJCS

Viewpoint

Performance of the Rapid Response Systems in Health Care Improvement: Benefits and Perspectives

Viviane Cordeiro Veiga et al. Salomón Soriano Ordinola Rojas

Introduction

In the last two decades, the rapid response systems (RRS) have been explored as initiatives to increase the safety of hospitalized patients. The main function is to identify and treat patients at risk, or who are presenting signs of clinical instability, and to prevent adverse events during hospital stay, with a consequent reduction in in-hospital mortality. Every year in the United States, more than 200,000 intrahospital cardiac arrests (CAs) occur, most of which could be avoided. RRS are formed by two health care components called the afferent limb and the efferent limb. The afferent limb is represented by the health care team in the admission units, responsible for the care of hospitalized patients and trained to activate the afferent limb, when physiological changes that predict adverse events are detected, especially cardiac arrests. The efferent limb is represented by a team of health care professionals, who respond to codes, and may be headed by a physician, a nurse or a physiotherapist. The efferent limb is better known as the rapid response team (RRT). In addition to these health care components, the rapid response systems must also have two other components, namely the administrative arm, which provides the necessary documentation and is responsible for the systems daily activities and the quality and governance arm, which contributes to continuous improvement and reassessment of the system. These systems have been implemented around the globe, but still in a non-uniform way in institutions and health systems with different characteristics. However, in Brazil, there are few reports on this issue.^,

[…]

Read Full Article

ABC

Original Article

Multiprofessional Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Very Elderly Patients

Luciana Muniz Sanches Siqueira Veiga Jardim et al. Thiago Veiga Jardim Weimar Kunz Sebba Barroso de Souza Camila Dutra Pimenta … Ana Luiza Lima Sousa Paulo César Brandão Veiga Jardim

Abstract

Background:

As the world population ages, patients older than 80 years, known as very elderly, are more frequently found. There are no studies in this age group aimed at analyzing the multidisciplinary intervention in the treatment of systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) and some comorbidities.

Objectives:

To assess the effect of a multidisciplinary approach in very elderly hypertensives cared for at a specialized service.

Methods:

Longitudinal retrospective cohort study in a multidisciplinary service specialized in the SAH treatment in the Brazilian West-Central region. Patients aged 80 years and older by June 2015 were included. Data from the first (V1) and last visit (Vf) were assessed. Anthropometric variables, blood pressure (BP), renal function, pharmacological treatment, lifestyle, comorbidities and cardiovascular events were studied, comparing data from V1 and Vf. Controlled BP was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) lower than 140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) lower than 90 mm Hg. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSSR software, version 21.0. Values of p<0,05 were considered significant.

Results:

Data of 71 patients were assessed with a mean follow-up time of 15,22 years. Their mean age at V1 was 69.2 years, and, at Vf, 84.53 years, and 26.8% of them were males. There was a significant reduction in mean SBP (157.3 x 142.1 mm Hg; p<0.001) and DBP (95.1 x 77.8 mm Hg; p<0.001), with an increase in BP control rates from V1 to Vf (36.6 x 83.1%; p<0.001). The number of antihypertensive drugs used increased (1.49 x 2.85; p<0.001), with an increase in the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (22.5 x 46.5%; p=0.004), angiotensin II receptor blockers (4.2 x 35.2%; p<0.001) and calcium-channel blockers (18.3 x 67.6%; p<0.001). There was a reduction in total cholesterol (217.9 x 191 mg/dL; p<0.001) and LDL-cholesterol (139.6 x 119.0 mg/dL; p<0.001), but worsening of the glomerular filtration rate (62.5 x 45.4 mL/min; p<0.001).

Conclusion:

The multidisciplinary intervention in very elderly hypertensives increased BP control rate, with optimization of the pharmacological treatment.

Read Full Article

ABC

Viewpoint

Is Heart Team Fundamental to Aortic Stenosis Transcatheter Treatment?

Vitor Emer Egypto Rosa et al. Antônio Sergio de Santis Andrade Lopes Tarso Augusto Duenhas Accorsi Pedro Alves Lemos Neto … Pablo Maria Alberto Pomerantzeff Flávio Tarasoutchi

Demographic projections have shown that the contingent of elderly people in Brazil will double within the next 20 years, with a consequent increase in the prevalence of aging-related diseases, such as degenerative aortic valve stenosis (AoS), diagnosed in 3% to 5% of the population older than 75 yeas ^, . New modalities of treatment for AoS have been recently developed, mainly represented by the transcatheter implantation of aortic prosthesis (TAVI – Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation), which has become a therapeutic option for patients whose conventional surgical treatment is not feasible. In the current scenario, characterized by the high demand of the increasing elderly population, the availability of new treatment methods provides clinical expertise for the accurate diagnosis of heart valve disease, assessment of the comorbidities and risks of interventions, in addition to the rationalization of resources, considering the complexity and high costs involved in TAVI.

Clinical practice has shown that the adequate selection of the best therapeutic method for high surgical-risk AoS requires multidisciplinary medical interaction, contemplating all the patients’ biopsychosocial characteristics. Thus, several medical centers have continuously incorporated the ‘Heart Team’ concept for decision-making. The Heart Team, a group composed by different specialists involved in managing heart valve disease, gathers opinions for the individualized analysis of those patients, from eligibility criteria and technical adequacy of the procedure to post-TAVI care. Each cardiological sub-specialty also plays particular roles in the procedure performance. The clinical cardiologist is responsible for patients’ selection and indication and for pre-and post-procedure follow-up. The cardiovascular surgeon is responsible for performing the transaortic and transapical procedure, helping with the transfemoral approach, and treating possible complications. The radiologist is responsible for assessing the access path and valve diameters, and helping choosing the adequate prosthesis. The echocardiographer is responsible for the anatomical and functional characterization of the valve disease and intraoperative assessment of the adequate position of the prosthesis and post-procedure complications. The interventional cardiologist is responsible for indicating the procedure and performing it. In addition, the Heart Team also comprises other professionals, such as nurses, physical therapists, nutritionists, and psychologists. Worldwide, there is an increasing incorporation of the Heart Team into cardiological centers, in accordance with the considerations of the last guidelines on heart valve diseases ^, . There is consensus about not encouraging the performance of TAVI at sites lacking a Heart Team, which emphasizes the importance of institutional alignment with the new recommendations.

[…]

Read Full Article