Original Article

Incidence and Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Valvular and Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Using Vitamin K Antagonists

Abstract

Background

Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) represent an important therapeutic strategy offered by the Brazilian Unified Public Health System to patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, predictors of relevant clinical outcomes are understudied in the real world.

Objective

To determine the incidence and independent predictors of clinical outcomes in patients with valvular and nonvalvular AF treated with VKA.

Methods

This prospective cohort included patients with valvular and nonvalvular AF receiving VKA for ≥ 1 year. The primary outcomes were cardiovascular death, thromboembolic events, and major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding, separately and as a composite outcome. The outcomes were independently adjudicated. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The study included 1,350 patients, with a mean age of 69.2 (± 11.8) years, 53.6% female, followed up for 17 (15 – 19) months. The annual incidence of thromboembolic events and cardiovascular death was 4.4%, and predictors were prior thromboembolism (hazard ratio [HR] 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22 – 3.67), time in therapeutic range (TTR) < 50% (HR 1.98; 95% CI 1.16 – 3.37), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR 2.76; 95% CI 4.82 – 1.58). The rate of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding was 3.24% per year (95% CI 2.47 – 4.14), and predictors were prior bleeding (HR 2.60; 95% CI 1.47 – 4.61) and mechanical prosthesis (HR 1.91; 95% CI 1.15 – 3.15). The composite outcome was 8.7% per year, and predictors were prior bleeding (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.07 – 2.70), TTR 44 mm (HR 1.97; 95% CI 3.26 – 1.19).

Conclusions

Prior thromboembolism or bleeding, reduced GFR and TTR levels, and enlarged left atrium were predictors of clinical outcomes in patients with AF treated with VKA.

Images

Metrics

Views 2
PlumX Metrics

Comments

0 Comments

Comments are moderated by the editorial team before publication. Discussions should be evidence-based and use scientific language. Conflicts of interest should be declared.

No comments yet.

Send a comment