Acetaminophen – ABC CARDIOL

ABC

Review Article

Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Paracetamol versus Ibuprofen in Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Newborns: A Systematic Review

Halecy Davidson Sousa da Silva et al. Eryvelton de Souza Franco Larissa Caroline de Almeida Sousa Lima Maria Bernadete de Sousa Maia

ABSTRACT

Closure of the ductus arteriosus (DA) using cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors is considered the first-line treatment for hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Physiologically, prostaglandins have a recognized role in PDA. Admittedly, the comparative efficacy and safety between ibuprofen and acetaminophen need to be determined for rational choice of drug therapy for closure of the DA in clinical protocols.

This study aims to present the aspects of the efficacy and therapeutic safety of paracetamol versus ibuprofen in the treatment of PDA in premature newborns.

A systematic review of the literature was carried out, following the recommendations of the PRISMA protocol, using the Medline, Pubmed, LILACS, and SciELO databases. Studies from the last 10 years (2013-2023) that analyzed the efficacy and/or safety of acetaminophen compared to ibuprofen in newborns diagnosed with PDA were included.

Eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were selected for analysis, resulting in a sample size of 781 newborns with PDA treated with acetaminophen or ibuprofen. The efficacy of acetaminophen for DA closure is comparable to ibuprofen. There is no statistically significant difference in the incidence of related adverse effects between the two drugs in most studies.

There is equivalence in the efficacy and safety of ibuprofen and acetaminophen to promote closure of the DA in premature newborns with hsPDA.

Read Full Article

IJCS

Original Article

Drug Interactions and Adverse Events in a Cohort of Warfarin Users Attending Public Health Clinics

Christiane de Fátima Colet et al. Tania Alves Amador Isabela Heineck

Abstract

Background:

Warfarin is an oral anticoagulant involved in important interactions with foods and other drugs.

Objectives:

To evaluate the occurrence of adverse events reported by warfarin users and their relationship with drug interactions.

Methods:

This was an open cohort, prospective study conducted in an 18-month period with warfarin users attending public health clinics of the city of Ijuí, Brazil. Data were collected by means of interviews administered at patients’ home every month. Patients’ responses were confirmed by review of medical records when patients sought medical care. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics. Potential drug interactions were evaluated in a database and vitamin K consumption was quantified using a validated method.

Results:

A total of 68 patients were followed-up; 63 completed the study and 5 died in the study period. Mean number of medications taken by the patients was 9.6 ± 4.5, and mean number of interactions involving warfarin was 2.91 ± 1.52. Most potential interactions increased the risk of bleeding, 61 of them severe interactions and 116 moderate interactions. Eighty-seven episodes of bleeding and 4 episodes of thrombosis were reported by a total of 37 and 4 patients, respectively. At the occurrence of these events, 56.5% of warfarin users were also taking omeprazole, 35.9% were taking simvastatin and 25.0% paracetamol. Most patients had a low vitamin K intake.

Conclusions:

A high frequency of potential interactions between warfarin and other drugs was detected, but a low intake of foods that could possibly affect the effects of warfarin was observed. Based on our results, it seems prudent to follow patients on warfarin therapy for drug-drug interactions, aiming to control adverse effects and to promote a safe and effective therapy.