Primary Angioplasty in the ACCEPT Registry: Why has it Been Difficult to Accept and Implement the Radial Artery Access as Preferential?

Radial access and the reduction in mortality and adverse cardiac events

Although the causal relationship remains controversial, several studies have reported that the radial access for primary angioplasty is associated with a reduction in mortality and in adverse cardiac events (). The largest clinical trial comparing the arterial accesses for percutaneous coronary intervention, the randomized and multicenter Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Intervention (RIVAL) trial, has selected individuals with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with or without ST-segment elevation, to whom the invasive strategy had been indicated. Individuals with the following characteristics were excluded: cardiogenic shock or previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) – which could make coronary angiography and the study of bypass grafts via the radial access difficult -, and peripheral arterial disease that could make the femoral approach unfeasible. Of the 7,021 patients randomized for femoral (n = 3,514) or radial (n = 3,507) access, 1,958 individuals (28%) were diagnosed with STEMI. In that specific subgroup, patients undergoing coronary angiography and angioplasty via radial access had lower rates of mortality (1.3% versus 3.2%, p = 0.006) and of the combined outcome of death, infarction and stroke (2.7 versus 4.6%, p = 0.031) at 30 days, as compared with individuals undergoing the procedure via femoral access. The beneficial results of the RIVAL trial in the subgroup of STEMI patients have been replicated in the Radial Versus Femoral Randomization Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (RIFLE-STEACS), a randomized clinical trial with 1,001 patients. Mortality at 30 days was significantly lower in patients undergoing angioplasty via radial access (5.2% versus 9.2%, p = 0.020). In addition, the subanalysis of the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial has revealed a significantly lower incidence of death and reinfarction at 30 days in individuals treated via the radial access (1.0% versus 4.3%; p = 0.02).

Although those trials have been designed to neither specifically assess the occurrence of death as primary outcome nor to unravel the potential mechanisms associated with its reduction, the favorable impact on the incidence of bleedings has been assumed to be the major determinant of the lower mortality of patients treated via the radial access.

[…]