Aortic Valve/abnormalities

ABC

Editorial

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implant in Latin America – We will Get There!

As with percutaneous coronary intervention, the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) is making great strides toward overcoming the surgical approach and becoming the predominant procedure in treating aortic stenosis. Since the first percutaneous implantation made by Dr. Alain Cribier, who turns 2 decades old this year, TAVI has demonstrated, study after study, robust evidence of its efficacy and safety. At each stage of this journey, the challenges were successively overcome both by the improvement of the devices and the skills acquired by the operators, which allowed us to move consistently from the prohibitive surgical risk scenario to the low-risk scenario in just over 15 years.^– Furthermore, evolution is unfolding^– – ongoing studies investigate the expansion of TAVI for young patient populations, bicuspid aortic valve, asymptomatic and even pure aortic regurgitation.

Today the million-dollar question is about the durability of devices that, in part, starts to be answered. In 2019, Thyregod et al. published the 5-year result of the NOTION study (The Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Trial), showing no differences in either the primary composite endpoint of death from any cause, stroke or heart attack (TAVR 38% vs. SAVR 36%; p=0.86) as in individual events. More recently, at the American College of Cardiology Congress (ACC 2022), Michael Reardon presented the 5-year results combining the CoreValve US Pivotal and SURTAVI studies showing that in intermediate- or high-risk patients, the rate of valve structural deterioration was significantly lower in the TAVI group compared to the surgical group (2.57% x 4.38%; p=0.0095). Nevertheless, these data are still insufficient to answer whether TAVI will be the Gold Standard for treating aortic valve diseases, regardless of etiology, age or type of dysfunction.

[…]

Read Full Article

IJCS

Original Article

Doppler Echocardiographic Follow-Up of Mitral and Aortic Regurgitation in Children and Adolescents with Subclinical and Mild Rheumatic Carditis

Lelia Maria de Almeida Carvalho et al. Fátima Derlene da Rocha Araújo Zilda Maria Alves Meira

Abstract

Background:

Mild rheumatic carditis (MRC) and subclinical rheumatic carditis (SRC) are basically differentiated through auscultation of mitral regurgitation murmur. The evolution of these forms is not well established in the literature.

Objective:

To evaluate the evolution of mild and subclinical rheumatic carditis, considering mitral and aortic regurgitation (acute phase) and regression, maintenance or worsening of these diseases at the end of follow-up (chronic phase).

Methods:

Retrospective, longitudinal study, including patients with mild and subclinical rheumatic carditis. The echocardiographic evolution of mitral and aortic regurgitation was compared in both groups, considering the analysis at the end of follow-up. The Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used, with significance level established at p < 0.05.

Results:

A total of 125 patients were included, 69 (55.2%) with subclinical rheumatic carditis and 56 (44.8%) with mild rheumatic carditis, with a mean age in the acute phase of 10.4 ± 2.6 years and, at the end of study, 19.9 ± 4.6 years. The time of follow-up ranged from 2 to 23 years (mean: 9.38 ± 4.3 years). In the acute phase, mild/moderate or moderate mitral regurgitation was more frequent in patients with mild rheumatic carditis (p = 0.001). Mild or mild/moderate aortic regurgitation was also more common in the mild rheumatic carditis group (p = 0.045). In the chronic phase, we observed that both mitral (p < 0.0001) and aortic regurgitation (p = 0.009) were more frequent in patients with mild rheumatic carditis, and survival free of rheumatic heart disease was higher in the subclinical rheumatic carditis group (p = 0.010). Residual mitral regurgitation was higher in the mild rheumatic carditis group p < 0.0001), and residual aortic regurgitation was similar in both groups (p = 0.099).

Conclusion:

Mitral regurgitation resolution was higher in patients with subclinical rheumatic carditis, and the involution of aortic regurgitation was less frequent and similar in both groups. (Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2017;30(5):391-400)