Fibrillatory Wave Amplitude: Should We Use It Routinely in Clinical Practice?
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained arrhythmia worldwide and is associated with an increased burden of morbidity and mortality in different clinical scenarios, even for patients with optimal anticoagulation and rate control treatment., Although previous studies did not show the benefit of rhythm control strategy compared to rate-control,, recent data suggest that current rhythm control strategies, in addition to symptom control, can improve hard clinical outcomes, including mortality and stroke.,
Rhythm control strategy refers to attempts to restore or maintain sinus rhythm and includes antiarrhythmic drugs, electrical cardioversion and atrial fibrillation ablation. Despite progressive improvement in rhythm control strategies over the years, a substantial amount of failure in maintaining sinus rhythm, mainly in patients with persistent forms of AF, underscores the importance of properly selecting patients for rhythm-control strategies.
[…]
Comments are moderated by the editorial team before publication. Discussions should be evidence-based and use scientific language. Conflicts of interest should be declared.