Amanda Althoff et al. Ariany Marques Vieira Lucas Santos da Silveira Magnus Benetti Marlus Karsten
Abstract
Background
Although the Talk Test (TT) is a reliable and low-cost test, its use for aerobic exercise prescription is still limited.
Objective
To analyze the heart rate (HR) in the stages of the TT and at the peak of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) as a parameter to prescribe aerobic exercise compared with HR at the first and second ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2) of cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET).
Methods
Individuals with cardiovascular disease attended three assessment days: 1) anamnesis and CPET; 2) 6MWT; and 3) TT. One-way repeated measures ANOVA or Friedman’s test were used to compare HR at VT1 and VT2 with HR at TT stages: last positive (TT+), first equivocal (TT±), and negative (TT−), and at the peak of the 6MWT. Pearson’s or Spearman’s test assessed correlations between HR at VTs, TT stages, and 6MWT. Statistical significance was set at 5%.
Results
The study included 22 cardiac patients (13 men, 61 ± 8 years). HR at VT1 was similar to HR at TT+ (p = 0.987) and TT± (p = 0.154), and moderately correlated with TT+ (r = 0.479, p = 0.024). HR at VT2 was similar to TT− (p = 0.383), with a strong correlation (r = 0.757, p < 0.001). HR at the peak of the 6MWT was significantly different from HR at TT+, TT±, and VT1 (p = 0.001, p = 0.005, and p < 0.001, respectively) but similar to TT− (p = 0.68).
Conclusions
HR at TT+ and TT− reflect HR at VT1 and VT2, respectively, differently from 6MWT, which was similar only to VT2. TT may be an objective test to assist aerobic exercise prescription in cardiac rehabilitation.