Evaluation of Cardiovascular Risks Associated with Calcium Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background
Calcium plays vital roles in both physiological and pathological processes, and its use as a therapeutic agent is primarily indicated for osteoporosis and osteopenia. It may increase cardiovascular risk, thereby increasing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Objective
To synthesize the available evidence on cardiovascular risks in patients using calcium-based medications and supplements.
Methods
This systematic review and meta-analysis utilized three major international databases and included intervention studies and comparative observational studies with data on the intake of calcium-based medications or supplements in adult populations and associated cardiovascular outcomes. A p-value < 0.05 was considered for all analyses, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.
Results
A total of fourteen articles were included: three pivotal intervention studies, four post hoc analyses, and seven observational studies. The outcomes assessed were mortality from cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary artery disease. Although an increased incidence of coronary artery disease was observed among users of calcium-based medications or supplements when considering only observational studies (RR 1.08; 95% CI 1.02–1.15), this finding was not confirmed in interventional studies. Therefore, further investigation is warranted. No increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke was observed. The quality of the evidence was considered low or very low for all outcomes due to the risk of bias and limitations inherent to the meta-analyses themselves.
Conclusions
Caution is recommended when interpreting the results, particularly in the development of clinical protocols. The importance of pharmacotherapeutic monitoring for patients using these medications is emphasized, and further research to explore additional outcomes is suggested.
Os comentários são moderados pela equipe editorial antes da publicação. As discussões devem ser baseadas em evidências e utilizar linguagem científica. Conflitos de interesse devem ser declarados.