Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons versus Drug-Eluting Stents in Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background

Drug-eluting stents (DES) remain the standard of care for percutaneous coronary intervention in small vessel coronary artery disease (SVD). Paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) have emerged as an alternative, with recent trials suggesting favorable short- and mid-term outcomes, although most were limited by small sample sizes.

Objectives

To compare angiographic and clinical outcomes between DES and PCB in patients with SVD.

Methods

Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies comparing PCB and DES in SVD, defined as a reference vessel diameter < 3.0 mm. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and results were reported as mean differences (MD) or risk ratios (RR). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed using the chi-square, Tau, and Tau² tests. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024506502).

Results

A total of 12 studies comprising 17,441 patients (mean age of 58-73 years) were included, with clinical follow-up of 8 to 36 months. All studies evaluated PCB. No significant differences were found between PCB and DES in target lesion revascularization (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.82-1.85; p = 0.30), late lumen loss (MD, –0.09 mm; 95% CI, –0.41 to 0.23; p = 0.57), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.76-1.33; p = 0.95), all-cause mortality (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.50-1.31; p = 0.39), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.78-3.89; p = 0.17), and myocardial infarction (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.46-1.27; p = 0.30).

Conclusions

PCB angioplasty demonstrated clinical and angiographic outcomes comparable to DES in SVD, supporting its role as a safe, effective alternative in selected patients.