Giovanni Possamai Dutra et al. Bruno Ferraz de Oliveira Gomes Plínio Resende do Carmo Júnior João Luiz Fernandes Petriz … Emilia Matos Nascimento Basilio de Bragança Pereira Gláucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira
Abstract
Background
The prognostic importance of the classification ‘heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction (EF)’ remains uncertain.
Objective
To analyze the clinical characteristics, comorbidities, complications, and in-hospital and late mortality of patients classified as having HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF – EF: 40%-49%), and to compare them to those of patients with HF with preserved EF (HFpEF – EF > 50%) and with HF with reduced EF (HFrEF – EF < 40%) on admission for decompensated HF.
Methods
Ambispective cohort of patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit due to decompensated HF. Clinical characteristics, comorbidities, complications, and in-hospital and late mortality were assessed. The software R was used, with a 5% significance, for the tests chi-square, analysis of variance, Cox multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve, in addition to machine-learning techniques (Elastic Net and survival tree).
Results
519 individuals were included between September 2011 and June 2019 (mean age, 74.87 ± 13.56 years; 57.6% were men). The frequencies of HFpEF, HFmrEF and HFrEF were 25.4%, 27% and 47.6%, respectively. Previous infarction was more frequent in HFmrEF. The mean follow-up time was 2.94 ± 2.55 years, with no statistical difference in mortality between the groups (53.8%, 52.1%, 57.9%). In the survival curve, there was difference between neither the HFpEF and HFmrEF groups, nor the HFpEF and HFrEF groups, but between the HFmrEF and HFrEF groups. Age over 77 years, previous HF, history of readmission, dementia and need for vasopressors were associated with higher late mortality in the survival tree.
Conclusion
The EF was not selected as a variable associated with mortality in patients with decompensated HF.
