Additional comments on the paper by Thomas et al: how to evaluate “quality of publication”
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Further comments on the paper by Thomas et al: how to evaluate “quality of publication”
[…]
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Further comments on the paper by Thomas et al: how to evaluate “quality of publication”
[…]
0 Comments
No comments yet.
Comments are moderated by the editorial team before publication. Discussions should be evidence-based and use scientific language. Conflicts of interest should be declared.