<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">dic</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia Imagem cardiovascular</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Arq Bras Cardiol: Imagem cardiovasc</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="epub">2675-312X</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">eabc98</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.47593/2675-312X/20203304eabc98</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Original Article</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Semiautomatic Quantification of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Volumes by Two-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison with Automatic Three-Dimensional Echocardiography</article-title>
				<trans-title-group xml:lang="pt">
					<trans-title>Quantificação Semiautomática da Fração de Ejeção e Volumes do Ventrículo Esquerdo ao Ecocardiograma Bidimensional: Comparação com o Ecocardiograma Tridimensional Automático</trans-title>
				</trans-title-group>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Borsoi</surname>
						<given-names>Rafael</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Silva</surname>
						<given-names>Miguel Morita Fernandes da</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Barberato</surname>
						<given-names>Silvio Henrique</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff1">
				<institution content-type="orgname">Quanta Diagnosis and Therapy</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Curitiba</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">PR</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
				<institution content-type="original">Quanta Diagnosis and Therapy – Curitiba, PR, Brazil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c01"> Mailing Address: Rafael Borsoi • R. Alm. Tamandaré, 1000 - Alto da XV, Curitiba - PR, 80045-170 E-mail: <email>rafaelborsoi@yahoo.com.br</email>
				</corresp>
				<fn fn-type="con">
					<p>Authors’ contributions</p>
					<p>Research creation and design: Borsoi R, Barberato SH; Data acquisition: Borsoi R, Barberato SH; Data analysis and interpretation: Borsoi R, Barberato SH, Silva MMF; Statistical analysis: Barberato SH, Silva MMF; Manuscript writing: Borsoi R, Barberato SH, Silva MMF; Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Borsoi R, Barberato SH, Silva MMF.</p>
				</fn>
				<fn fn-type="conflict">
					<p>Conflict of interest</p>
					<p>The author have declared that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>17</day>
				<month>12</month>
				<year>2021</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
				<season>Oct-Dec</season>
				<year>2020</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>33</volume>
			<issue>4</issue>
			<fpage>1</fpage>
			<lpage>6</lpage>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>9</day>
					<month>3</month>
					<year>2020</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="rev-recd">
					<day>26</day>
					<month>3</month>
					<year>2020</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>17</day>
					<month>4</month>
					<year>2020</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p> This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. </license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>Abstract</title>
				<sec>
					<title>Background</title>
					<p> Left ventricular ejection fraction is one of the most used echocardiographic parameters in clinical practice. Its estimation by two-dimensional manual method (Simpson method) has limited reproducibility and accuracy, and semi-automatic methods have been proposed. It becomes necessary to compare the semi-automatic two-dimensional method with more accurate methods of assessing left ventricular ejection fraction, such as measurement by automatic three-dimensional echocardiography.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Objective</title>
					<p> To compare the left ventricular ejection fraction, and left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes estimates by the semi-automatic two-dimensional method with those obtained using the automatic three-dimensional method.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Method</title>
					<p> Observational cross-sectional study, including patients in sinus rhythm, left ventricular ejection fraction &gt; 50% and without significant structural heart disease, submitted to transthoracic echocardiography. Student’s t test, Pearson’s coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis were used in the statistical analysis.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Results</title>
					<p> Forty patients were included, 53% women, 35% with arterial hypertension, 25% with dyslipidemia, 10% diabetic, 10% smokers and 13% with previous angioplasty. The mean values of left ventricular ejection fraction by three-dimensional and two-dimensional were 62.1 ± 5.8% and 61.7 ± 5.9% (p = 0.50), respectively. There was a strong correlation between left ventricular ejection fraction determined by two-dimensional and three-dimensional (r = 0.75; p &lt;0.001), as well as with left ventricular end-diastolic (r = 0.75; p &lt;0.001) and end-systolic (r = 0.76; p &lt; 0.001). There was good agreement between two-dimensional and three-dimensional left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference: -0.39; 95% confidence interval -1.7-0.9).</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Conclusion</title>
					<p> Left ventricular ejection fraction estimated by the two-dimensional semi-automatic method showed good agreement with the automatic three-dimensional method. The findings suggest the two-dimensional semi-automatic method as a reliable alternative for assessing volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction.</p>
				</sec>
			</abstract>
			<trans-abstract xml:lang="pt">
				<title>Resumo</title>
				<sec>
					<title>Fundamento</title>
					<p> A fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo é um dos parâmetros ecocardiográficos mais utilizados na prática clínica. Sua estimativa pelo método bidimensional manual (método de Simpson) tem reprodutibilidade e acurácia limitadas, e métodos semiautomáticos têm sido propostos. Torna-se necessário comparar o método bidimensional semiautomático com métodos mais acurados de avaliação da fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo, como a medida pela ecocardiografia tridimensional automática.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Objetivo</title>
					<p> Comparar as estimativas da fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo e dos volumes diastólico final e sistólico final do ventrículo esquerdo pelo método bidimensional semiautomático com as obtidas pelo método tridimensional automático.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Método</title>
					<p> Estudo observacional transversal, com pacientes em ritmo sinusal, fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo &gt;50% e sem cardiopatia estrutural significativa, submetidos ao ecocardiograma transtorácico. Teste t de Student, coeficiente de Pearson e análise de Bland-Altman foram usados na análise estatística.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Resultados</title>
					<p> Foram incluídos 40 pacientes, sendo: 53% mulheres, 35% hipertensos, 25% dislipidêmicos, 10% diabéticos, 10% tabagistas e 13% com angioplastia prévia. Os valores médios da fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo aos métodos tri e bidimensionais foram 62,1 ± 5,8% e 61,7 ± 5,9% (p = 0,50), respectivamente. Houve forte correlação da fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo determinada melos métodos bi e tridimensional (r = 0,74; p&lt;0,001), assim como com o volume diastólico final (r = 0,75; p&lt;0,001) e o sistólico final (r = 0,76; p&lt;0,001). Houve boa concordância entre a fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo bi e tridimensional (diferença média: -0,39; intervalo de confiança 95% -1,7-0,9).</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Conclusão</title>
					<p> A fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo estimada pelo método bidimensional semiautomático mostrou boa concordância com o método tridimensional automático. Os achados sugerem que o método bidimensional semiautomático represente uma alternativa confiável para avaliação dos volumes e fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo.</p>
				</sec>
			</trans-abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<kwd>Echocardiography, Doppler</kwd>
				<kwd>Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional</kwd>
				<kwd>Stroke Volume</kwd>
				<kwd>Ventricular Function, Left</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="pt">
				<kwd>Ecocardiografia Doppler</kwd>
				<kwd>Ecocardiografia Tridimensional</kwd>
				<kwd>Volume Sistólico</kwd>
				<kwd>Função Ventricular Esquerda</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="0"/>
				<table-count count="0"/>
				<equation-count count="0"/>
				<ref-count count="0"/>
				<page-count count="6"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
</article>