ijcs International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences Int. J. Cardiovasc. Sci. 2359-4802 2359-5647 Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia PNg6FpJKz7LTrXXShgs84dk S2359-56472019000500536 S2359-56472019005005101 10.5935/2359-4802.20180101 VIEWPOINT Performance of the Rapid Response Systems in Health Care Improvement: Benefits and Perspectives 0000-0002-0287-3601 Veiga Viviane Cordeiro 0000-0001-7304-5654 Rojas Salomón Soriano Ordinola Hospital BP - A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo SP Brazil Hospital BP - A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, SP - Brazil Mailing Address: Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Rua Martiniano de Carvalho, 864, Cj 310. Postal Code: 01321-000, Paraíso, SP - Brazil. E-mail: dveiga@uol.com.br, vcveiga@cardiol.br

Author contributions

Conception and design of the research: Veiga VC and Rojas SSO. Acquisition of data: Veiga VC and Rojas SSO. Analysis and interpretation of the data: Veiga VC and Rojas SSO. Writing of the manuscript: Veiga VC and Rojas SSO. Critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content: Veiga VC and Rojas SSO.

Potential Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

 15 04 2019 Sep-Oct 2019 32 05 536 539 29 12 2017 31 7 2018 7 8 2018 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Keywords: Hospital Rapid Response Team Patient Safety Patient Care Team Hospital Mortality Introduction

In the last two decades, the rapid response systems (RRS) have been explored as initiatives to increase the safety of hospitalized patients. The main function is to identify and treat patients at risk, or who are presenting signs of clinical instability, and to prevent adverse events during hospital stay, with a consequent reduction in in-hospital mortality. Every year in the United States, more than 200,000 intrahospital cardiac arrests (CAs) occur, most of which could be avoided.1 RRS are formed by two health care components called the afferent limb and the efferent limb.2 The afferent limb is represented by the health care team in the admission units, responsible for the care of hospitalized patients and trained to activate the afferent limb, when physiological changes that predict adverse events are detected, especially cardiac arrests. The efferent limb is represented by a team of health care professionals, who respond to codes, and may be headed by a physician, a nurse or a physiotherapist. The efferent limb is better known as the rapid response team (RRT). In addition to these health care components, the rapid response systems must also have two other components, namely the administrative arm, which provides the necessary documentation and is responsible for the systems daily activities and the quality and governance arm, which contributes to continuous improvement and reassessment of the system. These systems have been implemented around the globe, but still in a non-uniform way in institutions and health systems with different characteristics. However, in Brazil, there are few reports on this issue.3,4

Activating criteria

Failure in the early detection of clinical deterioration signs are frequent in the health institutions associated with the worst outcomes and increased hospital costs.5 RRS activation criteria are based, mainly, on changes in vital signs, which are routinely monitored in the hospitalization units. Schein et al.6, in 1990, studied the presence of clinical deterioration signs in the 24 hours prior to CA. Among the 64 patients evaluated, 54 (84%) presented at least one change in the clinical parameters during the eight hours that preceded the event.

In order to develop objective criteria for RRS activation, Franklin and Mathew7 described the changes which preceded CA: mean blood pressure lower than 70 mmHg, mean blood pressure higher than 130 mmHg, heart rate lower than 45 bpm, heart rate higher than 125 bpm, respiration rate under 10 bpm, respiration rate over 30 bpm, change in the level of consciousness and chest pain. Veiga3, on a case-by-case national basis, describes the results related with the changes in activation criteria, considering the epidemiological characteristics of the institution and maturity after 18 months of RRT. The RRT activation criteria described in the study that presented better results were: code blue (cardiac arrest); code yellow: heart rate less than 50 or more than 110 bpm; systolic blood pressure less than 90 or higher than 180 mmHg, with symptoms, respiratory rate under 10 or over 24 breaths/minute, decreased level of consciousness and/or sudden motor deficit, acute decrease of O2 saturation to < 90%, seizures, acute bleeding and active screening for sepsis.

However, there are major weaknesses in vital signs measurement, both in relation to the frequency of data collection and even in relation to their assessment confidence level, especially concerning the respiration rate.8,9 Failure in recognizing unstable patients leads to failure in the rescue and prevention of adverse events, which results in inefficient systems.

To minimize these issues, scores have been developed to improve detection of patients at risk.10-11 These scores are easily executed and have a high reproducibility, and can predict elevated risks of cardiac arrest and need for ICU admission.12 Nonetheless, scores that are based exclusively on vital signs have demonstrated limited accuracy, leading to lost opportunities to identify patients at risk of CA.

Therefore, the use of electronic systems, as well as new models of stratification of patients at risk of clinical deterioration, has been gaining ground, with the aim of ensuring the early identification and appropriate treatment of these situations.5,13-14 Churpek et al.15 assessed a model of electronic data, which not only analyzes the patient’s vital signs, but also their laboratorial and demographic characteristics which, compared to models using vital signs alone, showed benefits in the early identification of patients at risk for CA, as well as their need for ICU admission. Similarly, Kang et al.5 used an electronic score (eCART), in a study with 3,889 patients, which was able to identify risks at an earlier stage, compared to the usual RRT activation system.

Combined outcomes of CA and transfers to ICU or death in hospitalization units were assessed by Churpek et al, in 2014,15 in a study with data from five hospitals, which included 269,999 hospitalizations, and compared electronic data variables with the MEWS score. In all the outcomes assessed, the electronic scores were higher than MEWS score (p < 0.01)

On the other hand, even though it increases the sensitivity of code activation, the structure proposed by the rapid response systems may be seen as a reactive response when the in-hospital patient is already at risk. There are some reports of proactive models, which are based on daily follow-up visits to patients considered at high risk, for example, those who have been recently transferred from intensive care units and surgery centers.4,16 Other reports suggest the use of telemedicine units, which would provide support in patient care for the staff, while waiting for the rapid response team to arrive, leading to an earlier involvement of an intensivist in the management of the high-risk patient.17 Table 1 describes the scores for clinical deterioration.5,8,17,18-21

Scores for assessment of clinical deterioration
Authors Number of patients Outcomes Diagnostic accuracy Year of publication
Buist et al.8 6,303 In-hospital mortality Positive predictive value: 16.2%. Four or more abnormal observations - 88.2% 2004
Goldhill et al.18 63 ICU Admission Sensitivity - 97%; Specificity - 18% 1999
Goldhill & McNarry19 548 Mortality within 30 days Sensitivity - 7.7%; Specificity - 99.8% 2004
Subbe et al.20 709 ICU admission; Number of cardiac arrests; mortality within 60 days Endpoints ROC-curve analysis 2001
Hodgetts et al.21 250 Cardiac arrests Sensitivity/specificity: 100/17%; 98/36%; 94/61%; 89/77%; 86/89%; 84/96% and 52/99% for scores 1,2,3,4,5,7, and 9, respectively. 2002
Kang et al.5 3,889 Cardiac arrests and transfers to ICU Transfer to ICU - eCART > 54: sensitivity - 52.5% and specificity 88.5%. Cardiac arrests - eCART > 54: sensitivity - 80% e specificity -86%. 2016
Churpek et al.15 56,649 Cardiac arrest risk and transfer to ICU Sensitivity - 65% and specificity - 93% 2014
Results

The practice of RRT is already well established when a decrease in the number of cardiac arrests is measured outside the ICU environment. Furthermore, there is also an influence between the time of implementation and the positive results, attributable to the organizational culture.

However, when the impact of RRT on the reduction of mortality is assessed, the data are still conflicting. A meta-analysis study and a systematic review, including 18 studies, showed a 33.8% reduction in the number of CA outside the ICU, without in-hospital mortality reduction.22 A study involving more than 400,000 patients in 10 American hospitals,23 compared mortality before and after the implementation of RRT, and showed that in-hospital mortality decreased in six hospitals. Nevertheless, it is not possible to attribute these results to the RRT. Jung et al.24 in their turn demonstrated a reduction in mortality associated with the team performance (p = 0.002). A recent study shows a correlation between the hospital length of stay and worsened prognosis, in patients who presented with CA after admitting service within 48 hours of the RRT consultation.25

However, new perspectives have been studied to better evaluate the effectiveness of RRT.25,26

Brunsveld et al.27 assessed unexpected deaths, that is, without a pre-existing limitation of treatment, rather than all-cause mortality, where the improvement in survival after introduction of a RRT was more pronounced compared to all deaths as the endpoint.

Nonetheless, several aspects can also be associated with outcomes resulting from RRT, such as time of RRT activation. During daytime hours, latency time from changes in vital signs to RRT activation was shorter, compared to nighttime hours. Besides, activation during nighttime hours was associated with higher mortality.28,29

Inclusion in the Guidelines of The American Heart Association - Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS)

In the updated version of the Guidelines of the American Heart Association, released in 2015, “Surveillance and Prevention” were included as the first link in the chain of survival. In this context, the presence of rapid response teams (RRT) in the institutions was encouraged, with the aim of providing initial intervention in patients with clinical deterioration and preventing in-hospital cardiac arrests.21 Other organizations, such as the Joint Commission and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement also encourage the presence of RTT in hospitals.3

A Brazilian study, which evaluated the presence of RRT in a large-sized hospital, showed statistically significant reduction in the number of cardiac arrests (CAs) after the implementation of RRT (p < 0.001).3

The involvement and training of care staff are essential in the continuous and systematic search for clinical decompensation, at an early stage.

 Broadening the scope of performance

Recently, several studies have been published, with assessments of the RRT performance in end-of-life patients’ care. Studies have shown that up to 25% of RRT activation involved patients with pre-existing limitation of treatments.25 Smith et al.26 showed that after implementation of rapid response teams, there was a significant increase in the do-not-resuscitate orders (p < 0.001), which may impact on reduction of resource utilization among this group of patients.

 Conclusions

RRT implementation is related with in-patient safety, prevention of severe adverse events, such as cardiac events and impact on outcomes, resulting in reduced mortality. New scopes of performance have been established. However, the major challenge still lies in the early identification of clinical deterioration.

Sources of Funding

There were no external funding sources for this study.

Study Association

This study is not associated with any thesis or dissertation work.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

 References 1 Churpek MM, Yuen TC, Park SY, Gibbons R, Edelson DP. Using electronic health record data to develop and validate a prediction model for adverse outcomes in the wards. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(4):841-8. Churpek MM Yuen TC Park SY Gibbons R Edelson DP Using electronic health record data to develop and validate a prediction model for adverse outcomes in the wards Crit Care Med 2014 42 4 841 848 2 Jones D, Hicks P, Currey J, Holmes J, Fennessy GJ, Hillman K, et al; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society. Findings of the first ANZICS conference on the role of intensive care in Rapid Response Teams. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015;43(3):369-79. Jones D Hicks P Currey J Holmes J Fennessy GJ Hillman K Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Findings of the first ANZICS conference on the role of intensive care in Rapid Response Teams Anaesth Intensive Care 2015 43 3 369 379 3 Veiga VC. Atuação do Time de Resposta Rápida nos indicadores de melhoria da qualidade assistencial [doutorado]. Campinas (SP): UNICAMP; 2013. Veiga VC Atuação do Time de Resposta Rápida nos indicadores de melhoria da qualidade assistencial 2013 Campinas(SP) UNICAMP 4 Mezzaroba AL, Tanita MT, Festii J, Carrilho CM, Cardoso LT, Grion CM. Evaluation of the five-year operation period of a rapid response team led by an intensive care physician at a university hospital. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2016;28(3):278-84. Mezzaroba AL Tanita MT Festii J Carrilho CM Cardoso LT Grion CM Evaluation of the five-year operation period of a rapid response team led by an intensive care physician at a university hospital Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2016 28 3 278 284 5 Kang MA, Chuper MM, Zadravecz FJ, Adhikari R, Twu NM, Edelson DP. Real-time risk prediction on the wards: a feasibility study. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(8):1468-73. Kang MA Chuper MM Zadravecz FJ Adhikari R Twu NM Edelson DP Real-time risk prediction on the wards a feasibility study Crit Care Med 2016 44 8 1468 1473 6 Schein RM, Hazday N, Pena M, Ruben BH, Sprung CL. Clinical antecedents to in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Chest. 1990;98(6):1388-92. Schein RM Hazday N Pena M Ruben BH Sprung CL Clinical antecedents to in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest Chest 1990 98 6 1388 1392 7 Franklin C, Mathew J. Developing strategies to prevent inhospital cardiac arrest: analyzing responses of physicians and nurses in the hours before the event. Crit Care Med. 1994;22(2):244-7. Franklin C Mathew J Developing strategies to prevent inhospital cardiac arrest analyzing responses of physicians and nurses in the hours before the event Crit Care Med 1994 22 2 244 247 8 Buist M, Bernard S, Nquyen TV, Moore G, Anderson J. Association between clinically abnormal observations and subsequent in-hospital mortality: a prospective study. Resuscitation. 2004;62(2):137-41. Buist M Bernard S Nquyen TV Moore G Anderson J Association between clinically abnormal observations and subsequent in-hospital mortality a prospective study Resuscitation 2004 62 2 137 141 9 Cretikos MA, Bellomo R, Hillman K, Chen J, Finfer S, Flabouris A. Respiratory rate: the neglected vital sign. Med J Aust. 2008;188(11):657-9. Cretikos MA Bellomo R Hillman K Chen J Finfer S Flabouris A Respiratory rate the neglected vital sign Med J Aust 2008 188 11 657 659 10 Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Schmidt PL, Featherstone PI. Review and performance evaluation of aggregate weighted "track and trigger" systems. Resuscitation. 2008;77(2):170-9. Smith GB Prytherch DR Schmidt PL Featherstone PI Review and performance evaluation of aggregate weighted "track and trigger" systems Resuscitation 2008 77 2 170 179 11 Gao H, McDonnell A, Harrison DA, Moore T, Adam S, Daly K, et al. Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(4):667-79. Gao H McDonnell A Harrison DA Moore T Adam S Daly K Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward Intensive Care Med 2007 33 4 667 679 12 Spångfors M, Arvidsson L, Karlsson V, Samuelson K. The National Early Warning Score: Translation, testing and prediction in a Swedish setting. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2016 Dec;37:62-7. Spångfors M Arvidsson L Karlsson V Samuelson K The National Early Warning Score Translation, testing and prediction in a Swedish setting Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2016 12 37 62 67 13 Brown H, Terrence J, Vasquez P, Bates DW, Zimlichman E. Continuous monitoring in an inpatient medical surgical unit: a controlled clinical trial. Am J Med. 2014;127(3):226-32. Brown H Terrence J Vasquez P Bates DW Zimlichman E Continuous monitoring in an inpatient medical surgical unit a controlled clinical trial Am J Med 2014 127 3 226 232 14 Helfand M, Christensen V, Anderson J. Technology Assessment: Early Sense for Monitoring Vital Signs in Hospitalized Patients. VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Evidence Briefs [Internet]. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2011. VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Reports. 2016 May. Helfand M Christensen V Anderson J Technology Assessment: Early Sense for Monitoring Vital Signs in Hospitalized Patients. VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Evidence Briefs Internet Washington (DC) Department of Veterans Affairs (US) VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Reports 05 2016 15 Churpek MM, Yuen TC, Winslow C, Robicsek AA, Meltzer DO, Gibbons RD, et al. Multicenter development and validation of a risk stratification tool for ward patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(6):649-55. Churpek MM Yuen TC Winslow C Robicsek AA Meltzer DO Gibbons RD Multicenter development and validation of a risk stratification tool for ward patients Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014 190 6 649 655 16 Hueckel RM, Turi JL, Cheifetz IM, Mericle J, Meliones JN, Mistry KP. Beyond Rapid Response Teams: Instituting a "Rover Team" Improves the Management of At-Risk Patients, Facilitates Proactive Interventions, and Improves Outcomes. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 . Hueckel RM Turi JL Cheifetz IM Mericle J Meliones JN Mistry KP Beyond Rapid Response Teams: Instituting a "Rover Team" Improves the Management of At-Risk Patients, Facilitates Proactive Interventions, and Improves Outcomes Henriksen K Battles JB Keyes MA Grady ML 2008 17 Robison J, Slamon NB. A more rapid, rapid response. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016;17(9):871-5. Robison J Slamon NB A more rapid, rapid response Pediatr Crit Care Med 2016 17 9 871 875 18 Goldhill DR, Worthington L, Mulcahy A, Tarling M, Sumner A. The patient-at-risk team: identifying and managing seriously ill ward patients. Anaesthesia. 1999;54(9):853-60. Goldhill DR Worthington L Mulcahy A Tarling M Sumner A The patient-at-risk team identifying and managing seriously ill ward patients Anaesthesia 1999 54 9 853 860 19 Goldhill DR, McNarry AF. Physiological abnormalities in early warning scores are related to mortality in adult inpatients. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92(6):882-4. Goldhill DR McNarry AF Physiological abnormalities in early warning scores are related to mortality in adult inpatients Br J Anaesth 2004 92 6 882 884 20 Subbe CP, Kruger M, Rutheford P, Gemmel L. Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions. QJM. 2001;94(10):521-6. Subbe CP Kruger M Rutheford P Gemmel L Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions QJM 2001 94 10 521 526 21 Hodgetts TJ, Kenward G, Vlachonikolis IG, Payne S, Castle N. The identification of risk factors for cardiac arrest and formulation of activation criteria to alert a medical emergency team. Resuscitation. 2002;54(2):125-31. Hodgetts TJ Kenward G Vlachonikolis IG Payne S Castle N The identification of risk factors for cardiac arrest and formulation of activation criteria to alert a medical emergency team Resuscitation 2002 54 2 125 131 22 Chan PS, Jain R, Nallmothu BK, Berg RA, Sasson C. Rapid response teams: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(1):18-26. Chan PS Jain R Nallmothu BK Berg RA Sasson C Rapid response teams a systematic review and meta-analysis Arch Intern Med 2010 170 1 18 26 23 Salvatierra G, Bindler RC, Corbett C, Roll J, Daratha KB. Rapid response team implementation an in-hospital mortality. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(9):2001-6. Salvatierra G Bindler RC Corbett C Roll J Daratha KB Rapid response team implementation an in-hospital mortality Crit Care Med 2014 42 9 2001 2006 24 Jung B, Daurat A, De Jong A, Chanques G, Mahul M, Monnin M, et al. Rapid response team and hospital mortality in hospitalized patients. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(4):494-504. Jung B Daurat A De Jong A Chanques G Mahul M Monnin M Rapid response team and hospital mortality in hospitalized patients Intensive Care Med 2016 42 4 494 504 25 Kronick SL, Kurz MC, Lin S, Edelson DP, Berg RA, Billi JE, et al. Part 4: Systems of Care and Continuous Quality Improvement: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S397-413. Kronick SL Kurz MC Lin S Edelson DP Berg RA Billi JE Part 4 Systems of Care and Continuous Quality Improvement: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Circulation 2015 132 18 Suppl 2 S397 S413 26 Smith RL, Hayashi VN, Lee YI, Navarro-Mariazeta L, Felner K. The medical emergency team call: a sentinel event that triggers goal of care discussion. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(2):322-7. Smith RL Hayashi VN Lee YI Navarro-Mariazeta L Felner K The medical emergency team call a sentinel event that triggers goal of care discussion Crit Care Med 2014 42 2 322 327 27 Brunsveld-Reinders AH, Ludikhuizej J, Dijkgraaf MG, Arbous MS, de Jonge E; COMET study group. Unexpected versus all-cause mortality as the endpoint for investigating the effects of a rapid response system in hospitalized patients. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):168. Brunsveld-Reinders AH Ludikhuizej J Dijkgraaf MG Arbous MS de Jonge E COMET study group Unexpected versus all-cause mortality as the endpoint for investigating the effects of a rapid response system in hospitalized patients Crit Care 2016 20 1 168 168 28 Fernando SM, Reardon PM, Bagshaw S, Scales DC, Murphy K, Shen J, et al. Impact of nighttime Rapid Response Team activation on outcomes of hospitalized patients with acute deterioration. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):67. Fernando SM Reardon PM Bagshaw S Scales DC Murphy K Shen J Impact of nighttime Rapid Response Team activation on outcomes of hospitalized patients with acute deterioration Crit Care 2018 22 1 67 67 29 Tirkkonen J, Huhtala H, Hoppu S. In-hospital cardiac arrest after a rapid response team review: a matched case-control study. Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:98-103. Tirkkonen J Huhtala H Hoppu S In-hospital cardiac arrest after a rapid response team review a matched case-control study Resuscitation 2018 05 126 98 103