<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" specific-use="sps-1.9" dtd-version="1.1" xml:lang="pt" article-type="rapid-communication">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">abc</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Arq. Bras. Cardiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">0066-782X</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1678-4170</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>S&#227;o Paulo, SP, Brazil</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id" specific-use="scielo-v3">Y9P9tZ4XV3bK7MwxXyZf5Bd</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id" specific-use="scielo-v2">S0066-782X2012001300012</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id" specific-use="scielo-v1">S0066-782X(12)09900412</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0066-782X2012001300012</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Comunica&#231;&#227;o Breve</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Uso inapropriado da ecocardiografia transtor&#225;cica, segundo recomenda&#231;&#245;es da SBC</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Barachi</surname>
            <given-names>Laiz Boniziolli</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01"/>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff02"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Barbosa</surname>
            <given-names>Fl&#225;via Candolo Pupo</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01"/>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff02"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Moscavitch</surname>
            <given-names>Samuel-Datum</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01"/>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff02"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Pilon</surname>
            <given-names>B&#225;rbara Contarato</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01"/>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff02"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Pissinati</surname>
            <given-names>Gabriela Vescovi</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01"/>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff02"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Mesquita</surname>
            <given-names>Evandro Tinoco</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01"/>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff02"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Mesquita</surname>
            <given-names>Cl&#225;udio Tinoco</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01"/>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff02"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Santos</surname>
            <given-names>Marcus Vinicius</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01"/>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff02"/>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff01">
        <addr-line>
          <named-content content-type="city">Niter&#243;i</named-content>
          <named-content content-type="state">Rio de Janeiro</named-content>
        </addr-line>
        <institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal Fluminense</institution>
        <institution content-type="orgdiv1">Hospital Universit&#225;rio Ant&#244;nio Pedro </institution>
        <country country="BR">Brazil</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="aff02">
        <addr-line>
          <named-content content-type="city">Rio de Janeiro</named-content>
          <named-content content-type="state"/>
        </addr-line>
        <institution content-type="orgname">Hospital Pr&#243;-Card&#237;aco</institution>
        <country country="BR">Brazil</country>
      </aff>
      <pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
        <month>10</month>
        <year>2012</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>99</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>952</fpage>
      <lpage>955</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
          <license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>FUNDAMENTO: Diretrizes s&#227;o fontes de recomenda&#231;&#245;es para a solicita&#231;&#227;o adequada de exames. Em 2009, a Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) publicou novas Diretrizes para a ecocardiografia transtor&#225;cica (ETT). OBJETIVO: Avaliar a preval&#234;ncia de solicita&#231;&#245;es ambulatoriais Classe III para ETT e analisar o perfil destas solicita&#231;&#245;es comparando-as entre um hospital p&#250;blico universit&#225;rio (HPU) e um hospital cardiol&#243;gico privado (HCP). M&#201;TODOS: Foram avaliadas prospectivamente 779 solicita&#231;&#245;es consecutivas de ETT ambulatoriais: 391 do HCP e 388 do HPU, entre dezembro de 2009 a maio de 2010. A distribui&#231;&#227;o das indica&#231;&#245;es foi comparada pelo teste qui-quadrado. O valor de signific&#226;ncia estat&#237;stica adotado foi de 0,05. RESULTADOS: Das 779 indica&#231;&#245;es ambulatoriais, 61 (7,8%) foram consideradas Classe III. Destas 14 eram do HPU e 47 do HCP. A distribui&#231;&#227;o das indica&#231;&#245;es diferiu de modo significativo entre as institui&#231;&#245;es (p &lt; 0,001): check-up em pacientes assintom&#225;ticos liderou as indica&#231;&#245;es inapropriadas com 37 casos (33 no HCP - 89,18%); seguido de avalia&#231;&#227;o p&#243;s-angioplastia em 9 casos (8 na institui&#231;&#227;o privada - 88,88%); acompanhamento de fun&#231;&#227;o ventricular em pacientes com insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca est&#225;vel com 6 casos (4 no HPU - 66,66%); p&#243;s-cirurgia de revasculariza&#231;&#227;o, 5 casos (4 no HCP - 80%); e avalia&#231;&#227;o de altera&#231;&#227;o eletrocardiogr&#225;fica inespec&#237;fica em 4 casos (4 no HPU - 100%). CONCLUS&#195;O: Avalia&#231;&#227;o de assintom&#225;ticos &#233; a causa principal de indica&#231;&#245;es classe III no ETT que diferiram entre as institui&#231;&#245;es: avalia&#231;&#227;o de check-up na institui&#231;&#227;o privada versus acompanhamento de insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca na p&#250;blica.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="pt" kwd-group-type="author-generated">
        <kwd>Ecocardiografia</kwd>
        <kwd>mal uso de servi&#231;os de sa&#250;de</kwd>
        <kwd>insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca</kwd>
        <kwd>diretrizes de pr&#225;tica cl&#237;nica</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub">
        <day>30</day>
        <month>10</month>
        <year>2012</year>
      </pub-date>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <p>
      <bold>COMUNICA&#199;&#195;O BREVE</bold>
    </p>
    <p>
      <bold>Uso inapropriado da ecocardiografia transtor&#225;cica, segundo recomenda&#231;&#245;es da SBC</bold>
    </p>
    <p>
      <bold>Laiz Boniziolli Barachi; Fl&#225;via Candolo Pupo Barbosa; Samuel-Datum Moscavitch; B&#225;rbara Contarato Pilon; Gabriela Vescovi Pissinati; Evandro Tinoco Mesquita; Cl&#225;udio Tinoco Mesquita; Marcus Vinicius Santos</bold>
    </p>
    <p> Hospital Universit&#225;rio Ant&#244;nio Pedro, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niter&#243;i; Hospital Pr&#243;-Card&#237;aco, Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brasil </p>
    <p>
      <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="end">Correspond&#234;ncia</xref>
    </p>
    <p>
      <bold>RESUMO</bold>
    </p>
    <p><bold>FUNDAMENTO:</bold> Diretrizes s&#227;o fontes de recomenda&#231;&#245;es para a solicita&#231;&#227;o adequada de exames. Em 2009, a Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) publicou novas Diretrizes para a ecocardiografia transtor&#225;cica (ETT).  </p>
    <p> OBJETIVO: Avaliar a preval&#234;ncia de solicita&#231;&#245;es ambulatoriais Classe III para ETT e analisar o perfil destas solicita&#231;&#245;es comparando-as entre um hospital p&#250;blico universit&#225;rio (HPU) e um hospital cardiol&#243;gico privado (HCP). </p>
    <p><bold>M&#201;TODOS:</bold> Foram avaliadas prospectivamente 779 solicita&#231;&#245;es consecutivas de ETT ambulatoriais: 391 do HCP e 388 do HPU, entre dezembro de 2009 a maio de 2010. A distribui&#231;&#227;o das indica&#231;&#245;es foi comparada pelo teste qui-quadrado. O valor de signific&#226;ncia estat&#237;stica adotado foi de 0,05. </p>
    <p><bold>RESULTADOS:</bold> Das 779 indica&#231;&#245;es ambulatoriais, 61 (7,8%) foram consideradas Classe III. Destas 14 eram do HPU e 47 do HCP. A distribui&#231;&#227;o das indica&#231;&#245;es diferiu de modo significativo entre as institui&#231;&#245;es (p &lt; 0,001): check-up em pacientes assintom&#225;ticos liderou as indica&#231;&#245;es inapropriadas com 37 casos (33 no HCP - 89,18%); seguido de avalia&#231;&#227;o p&#243;s-angioplastia em 9 casos (8 na institui&#231;&#227;o privada - 88,88%); acompanhamento de fun&#231;&#227;o ventricular em pacientes com insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca est&#225;vel com 6 casos (4 no HPU - 66,66%); p&#243;s-cirurgia de revasculariza&#231;&#227;o, 5 casos (4 no HCP - 80%); e avalia&#231;&#227;o de altera&#231;&#227;o eletrocardiogr&#225;fica inespec&#237;fica em 4 casos (4 no HPU - 100%). </p>
    <p><bold>CONCLUS&#195;O:</bold> Avalia&#231;&#227;o de assintom&#225;ticos &#233; a causa principal de indica&#231;&#245;es classe III no ETT que diferiram entre as institui&#231;&#245;es: avalia&#231;&#227;o de check-up na institui&#231;&#227;o privada versus acompanhamento de insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca na p&#250;blica.</p>
    <p><bold>Palavras-chave:</bold> Ecocardiografia / utiliza&#231;&#227;o; mal uso de servi&#231;os de sa&#250;de; insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca; diretrizes de pr&#225;tica cl&#237;nica.</p>
    <p>
      <bold>Introdu&#231;&#227;o</bold>
    </p>
    <p>Nos &#250;ltimos anos, o modelo brasileiro de sa&#250;de tem se aproximado ao tecnicista americano, revelando um progresso tecnol&#243;gico, acompanhado do aumento na solicita&#231;&#227;o de exames complementares. O ecocardiograma transtor&#225;cico (ETT) constitui um exame de relativo baixo custo, extensamente utilizado em setores p&#250;blicos e privados. Em 2010, foram realizados 715.655 ETT de car&#225;ter eletivo ambulatorial por meio do Sistema &#218;nico de Sa&#250;de (SUS), dos quais 425.317 (59%) feitos na regi&#227;o sudeste do pa&#237;s, com custo total estimado de R$30.704.597,02<sup>1</sup>. Em meio a essa crescente demanda, um grande desafio para os servi&#231;os de imagem cardiovascular &#233; manter o padr&#227;o de qualidade<sup>2</sup>. Al&#233;m disso, solicita&#231;&#245;es desnecess&#225;rias de exames s&#227;o frequentes, principalmente no setor privado. Uma das explica&#231;&#245;es poderia estar na dist&#226;ncia entre a pr&#225;tica m&#233;dica e as recomenda&#231;&#245;es de sociedades sobre o uso racional de exames complementares<sup>2</sup>. </p>
    <p>Em 2009, as Diretrizes das Indica&#231;&#245;es de Ecocardiografia da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)<sup>3</sup> foram publicadas no intuito de orientar m&#233;dicos quanto ao uso apropriado do ETT, para aumentar a acur&#225;cia diagn&#243;stica e otimizar os recursos dispon&#237;veis. Segundo as diretrizes da SBC, as solicita&#231;&#245;es podem ser classificadas em: Classe I, quando h&#225; evid&#234;ncia ou aceita&#231;&#227;o geral de que um determinado procedimento ou tratamento &#233; &#250;til e efetivo; Classe II, quando h&#225; conflito de evid&#234;ncias e/ou diverg&#234;ncia de opini&#227;o sobre a utilidade/efic&#225;cia de um procedimento ou tratamento; Classe IIa, quando a evid&#234;ncia/opini&#227;o favorece a utilidade/efic&#225;cia; Classe IIb, quando a utilidade/efic&#225;cia est&#225; menos estabelecida por evid&#234;ncia/opini&#227;o; Classe III, quando h&#225; evid&#234;ncia e/ou aceita&#231;&#227;o geral de que o procedimento/tratamento n&#227;o &#233; &#250;til/efetivo e que, em alguns casos, poderia ser prejudicial<sup>3</sup>. No entanto, existem poucos estudos que avaliem a adequa&#231;&#227;o das solicita&#231;&#245;es de ETT, segundo diretrizes elaboradas por especialistas brasileiros<sup>4</sup>. </p>
    <p>O objetivo do presente artigo foi investigar a preval&#234;ncia das solicita&#231;&#245;es ambulatoriais de ETT Classe III (inadequadas), segundo as diretrizes da SBC, e analisar o perfil destas solicita&#231;&#245;es, comparando-as entre um hospital p&#250;blico universit&#225;rio (HPU) e um hospital cardiol&#243;gico privado (HCP). </p>
    <p>
      <bold>Material e M&#233;todos</bold>
    </p>
    <p>Estudo observacional e prospectivo, onde se avaliou consecutivamente 779 solicita&#231;&#245;es ambulatoriais de ETT de uma institui&#231;&#227;o privada (n = 391; 50,2%) e uma p&#250;blica (n = 388; 49,8%), entre dezembro de 2009 a maio de 2010. As indica&#231;&#245;es foram classificadas com base nos crit&#233;rios das diretrizes da SBC por dois avaliadores m&#233;dicos. Nesse estudo, foram consideradas como inadequadas as solicita&#231;&#245;es classificadas como Classe III, conforme recomendam as diretrizes da SBC. As solicita&#231;&#245;es foram previamente analisadas, de modo prospectivo, segundo crit&#233;rios de adequa&#231;&#227;o do <italic>American College of Cardiology </italic>para exames ecocardiogr&#225;ficos<sup>5</sup>; e, quando necess&#225;rio, foi feita a adapta&#231;&#227;o desses crit&#233;rios (ACC) correlacionando com as indica&#231;&#245;es classe III das diretrizes da SBC de 2004 e 2009<sup>4</sup>. </p>
    <p>Foram inclu&#237;dos pacientes acima de 18 anos de idade. Foram exclu&#237;dos pacientes internados e aqueles em que a solicita&#231;&#227;o do exame do m&#233;dico assistente n&#227;o estava dispon&#237;vel ou leg&#237;vel, assim como os exames sem classifica&#231;&#227;o. A pesquisa foi aprovada previamente pelo comit&#234; de &#233;tica em pesquisa (CEP) da UFF/HUAP (130/2010) e do Hospital Pr&#243;-Card&#237;aco (330/2009). </p>
    <p>Os resultados est&#227;o expressos em valores percentuais de frequ&#234;ncia. A compara&#231;&#227;o das diferen&#231;as foi realizada atrav&#233;s do teste qui-quadrado (&#967;<sup>2</sup>), ou exato de Fisher. O valor de signific&#226;ncia estat&#237;stica adotado foi de p &lt; 0,05.</p>
    <p>
      <bold>Resultados</bold>
    </p>
    <p>Do total de 779 solicita&#231;&#245;es, 432 solicita&#231;&#245;es foram para mulheres (56%) e 347 para homens (44%); 388 solicita&#231;&#245;es do HPU e 391 do HCP. A m&#233;dia de idade foi de 59 + 15 anos. Das 61 (7,8%) indica&#231;&#245;es classificadas como inadequadas, 14 (22,95%) eram provenientes do HPU e 47 (77,04%) do HCP. A m&#233;dia de idade dos pacientes com solicita&#231;&#227;o Classe III foi de 62,3 anos. Observou-se uma diferen&#231;a significativa na distribui&#231;&#227;o das indica&#231;&#245;es entre as institui&#231;&#245;es (p &lt; 0,001). No HPU, 14 (3,6%) das 388 solicita&#231;&#245;es foram classificadas como inapropriadas (Classe III); enquanto, no HCP, foram 47 (12%). O <xref ref-type="fig" rid="a02gra01">Gr&#225;fico 1</xref> mostra a distribui&#231;&#227;o geral das 61 (7,8%) indica&#231;&#245;es consideradas classe III, sendo que para <italic>check-up</italic> de rotina ocorreu em 37 casos (33 no HCP; 89,18%), seguido da avalia&#231;&#227;o p&#243;s-angioplastia em 9 casos (8 no HCP; 88,88%). Para acompanhamento de fun&#231;&#227;o ventricular em pacientes com insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca est&#225;veis em 6 casos (4 no HPU; 66,66%), p&#243;s-cirurgia de revasculariza&#231;&#227;o foram 5 casos (4 no HCP; 80%) e avalia&#231;&#227;o de altera&#231;&#227;o eletrocardiogr&#225;fica inespec&#237;fica em 4 casos (4 no HPU; 100%). Entre os pacientes assintom&#225;ticos, 40 (65,57%) n&#227;o possu&#237;am doen&#231;a de base.</p>
    <p content-type="asset">
      <fig id="a02gra01">
        <graphic xlink:href="1678-4170-abc-99-04-0952-00012-gf01.jpg"/></fig>
    </p>
    <p>
      <bold>Discuss&#227;o</bold>
    </p>
    <p>A ecocardiografia &#233; um dos m&#233;todos diagn&#243;sticos mais empregados na pr&#225;tica cl&#237;nica cardiol&#243;gica. Estudos recentes<sup>6-10</sup> t&#234;m comparado a qualidade das solicita&#231;&#245;es de ETT segundo crit&#233;rios de adequa&#231;&#227;o do <italic>American College of Cardiology</italic> (ACC). O estudo de Ward e cols.<sup>6</sup>, que comparou as solicita&#231;&#245;es ambulatoriais inapropriadas no setor acad&#234;mico e na comunidade, n&#227;o encontrou diferen&#231;a significativa (17% <italic>vs</italic>. 15%; p = n&#227;o significativo). De forma similar, Willens e cols.<sup>7</sup> tamb&#233;m n&#227;o encontraram diferen&#231;a significativa ao comparar solicita&#231;&#245;es ambulatoriais inapropriadas no sistema americano de assist&#234;ncia a veteranos (<italic>Veterans Affairs</italic>) e a pr&#225;tica assistencial acad&#234;mica (7% <italic>vs</italic>. 9,5%, p = 0,558). Diferentemente em nosso estudo, utilizando recomenda&#231;&#245;es da SBC foi constatada uma diferen&#231;a significativa entre solicita&#231;&#245;es ambulatoriais Classe III (inadequadas) no HPU e no HCP (3,6% <italic>vs</italic>. 12%, p &lt; 0,001).</p>
    <p> Baseado nos crit&#233;rios de adequa&#231;&#227;o do ACC, Barbosa e cols.<sup>9</sup> compararam solicita&#231;&#245;es ambulatoriais inapropriadas, a partir da mesma amostra descrita em nosso estudo (n = 779). No entanto, o estudo de Barbosa e cols.<sup>9</sup> n&#227;o encontrou diferen&#231;a significativa entre as solicita&#231;&#245;es inapropriadas no HPU e no HCP (25% vs. 29%). Apenas o estudo de Rao e cols.<sup>10</sup> reportou frequ&#234;ncia t&#227;o elevada (26%) de solicita&#231;&#245;es inapropriadas de ETT. Por outro lado, Kirkpatrick e cols.<sup>8</sup> mostraram uma frequ&#234;ncia de 8% similar &#224; observada em nosso estudo (7,8%). Ao comparar as diretrizes brasileiras<sup>3</sup> com os crit&#233;rios do ACC<sup>5</sup>, observa-se que as diretrizes da SBC de 2009 consideram apenas 41 indica&#231;&#245;es como inadequadas, enquanto que os crit&#233;rios americanos contemplam 71 indica&#231;&#245;es inapropriadas de ecocardiografia. Essa diferen&#231;a sugere uma necessidade de revisar as atuais diretrizes brasileiras com intuito de estender sua aplicabilidade. </p>
    <p>Em nosso estudo, uma diferen&#231;a significativa foi constatada no perfil de indica&#231;&#227;o cl&#237;nica para ETT entre a institui&#231;&#227;o p&#250;blica e a privada (p &lt; 0,001). A utiliza&#231;&#227;o de ETT para <italic>check-up</italic> rotineiro em pacientes assintom&#225;ticos e a repeti&#231;&#227;o de ETT em pacientes sem modifica&#231;&#227;o cl&#237;nica da condi&#231;&#227;o de base foram os principais motivos de solicita&#231;&#245;es Classe III na institui&#231;&#227;o privada e p&#250;blica, respectivamente.</p>
    <p>O progresso tecnol&#243;gico na &#225;rea de sa&#250;de e o aumento na disponibilidade de exames complementares t&#234;m promovido um exagero em solicita&#231;&#245;es de ETT, muitas sem indica&#231;&#227;o cl&#237;nica. Al&#233;m dos custos elevados, exames solicitados desnecessariamente sobrecarregam os servi&#231;os de sa&#250;de, dificultando o acesso e o tempo para realiza&#231;&#227;o dos exames, o que torna o sistema de sa&#250;de lento, oneroso e ineficiente.</p>
    <p>Considerando que s&#227;o realizados mais de 800 mil ETTs por ano no SUS e que a frequ&#234;ncia de solicita&#231;&#245;es inadequadas seja de 8%, estima-se que cerca de 64 mil exames s&#227;o realizados de modo desnecess&#225;rio todo ano. Dessa forma, a necessidade de melhorar a gest&#227;o dos recursos financeiros da medicina complementar sugere quest&#245;es sobre custo-efetividade dos exames solicitados e sobre uma car&#234;ncia de programas de educa&#231;&#227;o m&#233;dica continuada.</p>
    <p>
      <fn id="end" fn-type="corresp">
        <label>
          <bold> Correspond&#234;ncia:</bold>
        </label>
        <p> Cl&#225;udio Tinoco Mesquita </p>
        <p> Av. Almirante Ary Parreiras, 60, Apto. 801, Icara&#237; </p>
        <p> CEP 24230-322, Niter&#243;i, RJ - Brasil </p>
        <p> E-mail: </p>
        <p><email xlink:href="tinocom@cardiol.br">tinocom@cardiol.br</email>, </p>
        <p>
          <email xlink:href="claudiotinocomesquita@gmail.com">claudiotinocomesquita@gmail.com</email>
        </p>
      </fn>
    </p>
    <p>Artigo recebido em 09/08/11; revisado em 15/08/11; aceito em 18/06/12.</p>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>1. Minist&#233;rio da Sa&#250;de. Datasus. Sistema de informa&#231;&#245;es ambulatoriais do SUS (SAI/SUS). [Acesso em 2011 dez 12]. Dispon&#237;vel em <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.datasus.gov.br/catalogo/siasus/historico/htm">http://www.datasus.gov.br/catalogo/siasus/historico/htm</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <source>Sistema de informa&#231;&#245;es ambulatoriais do SUS (SAI/SUS)</source>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>2. Barbosa FC, Mesquita ET, Salgado A, Mesquita CT. Qualidade em cardioimagem: crit&#233;rios de appropriateness aplicados &#224; ecocardiografia. Rev Bras Cardiol. 2010;23(3):185-96.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <article-title>Qualidade em cardioimagem: crit&#233;rios de appropriateness aplicados &#224; ecocardiografia</article-title>
          <source>Rev Bras Cardiol</source>
          <date>
            <year>2010</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>185</fpage>
          <lpage>96</lpage>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <volume>23</volume>
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Barbosa</surname>
              <given-names>FC</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Mesquita</surname>
              <given-names>ET</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Salgado</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Mesquita</surname>
              <given-names>CT</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>3. Barbosa MM, Nunes MCP, Campos Filho O, Camarozano A, Rabischoffsky A, Maciel BC, et al. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. Diretrizes das indica&#231;&#245;es da ecocardiografia. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2009;93 (6 supl.3):e265-e302.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <article-title>Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia: Diretrizes das indica&#231;&#245;es da ecocardiografia</article-title>
          <source>Arq Bras Cardiol</source>
          <date>
            <year>2009</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>e265</fpage>
          <lpage>e302</lpage>
          <issue>6</issue>
          <volume>93</volume>
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Barbosa</surname>
              <given-names>MM</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Nunes</surname>
              <given-names>MCP</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Campos Filho</surname>
              <given-names>O</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Camarozano</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Rabischoffsky</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Maciel</surname>
              <given-names>BC</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>4. Campos Filho O, Zielinsky P, Ortiz J, Maciel BC, Andrade JL, Mathias W Jr, et al. Diretriz para indica&#231;&#245;es e utiliza&#231;&#227;o da ecocardiografia na pr&#225;tica cl&#237;nica. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2004;82 Suppl. 2:11-34.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <article-title>Diretriz para indica&#231;&#245;es e utiliza&#231;&#227;o da ecocardiografia na pr&#225;tica cl&#237;nica</article-title>
          <source>Arq Bras Cardiol</source>
          <date>
            <year>2004</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>11</fpage>
          <lpage>34</lpage>
          <volume>82</volume>
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Campos Filho</surname>
              <given-names>O</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Zielinsky</surname>
              <given-names>P</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ortiz</surname>
              <given-names>J</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Maciel</surname>
              <given-names>BC</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Andrade</surname>
              <given-names>JL</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Mathias</surname>
              <given-names>W Jr</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>5. Douglas PS, Garcia MJ, Haines DE, Lai WW, Manning WJ, Patel AR, et al; American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(9):1126-66.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <article-title>Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography</article-title>
          <source>J Am Coll Cardiol</source>
          <date>
            <year>2011</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>1126</fpage>
          <lpage>66</lpage>
          <issue>9</issue>
          <volume>57</volume>
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Douglas</surname>
              <given-names>PS</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Garcia</surname>
              <given-names>MJ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Haines</surname>
              <given-names>DE</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lai</surname>
              <given-names>WW</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Manning</surname>
              <given-names>WJ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Patel</surname>
              <given-names>AR</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>6. Ward RP, Krauss D, Mansour IN, Lemieux N, Gera N, Lang RM; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Society of Echocardiography. Comparison of the clinical application of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria for outpatient transthoracic echocardiography in academic and community practice settings. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(12):1375-81.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <article-title>Comparison of the clinical application of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria for outpatient transthoracic echocardiography in academic and community practice settings</article-title>
          <source>J Am Soc Echocardiogr</source>
          <date>
            <year>2009</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>1375</fpage>
          <lpage>81</lpage>
          <issue>12</issue>
          <volume>22</volume>
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Ward</surname>
              <given-names>RP</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Krauss</surname>
              <given-names>D</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Mansour</surname>
              <given-names>IN</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lemieux</surname>
              <given-names>N</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gera</surname>
              <given-names>N</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lang</surname>
              <given-names>RM</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>7. Willens HJ, Gomez-Marin O, Heldman A, Chakko S, Postel C, Hasan T, et al. Adherence to appropriateness criteria for transthoracic echocardiography: comparisons between a regional department of Veterans Affairs health care system and academic practice and between physicians and mid-level providers. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(7):793-9.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <article-title>Adherence to appropriateness criteria for transthoracic echocardiography: comparisons between a regional department of Veterans Affairs health care system and academic practice and between physicians and mid-level providers</article-title>
          <source>J Am Soc Echocardiogr</source>
          <date>
            <year>2009</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>793</fpage>
          <lpage>9</lpage>
          <issue>7</issue>
          <volume>22</volume>
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Willens</surname>
              <given-names>HJ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gomez-Marin</surname>
              <given-names>O</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Heldman</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Chakko</surname>
              <given-names>S</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Postel</surname>
              <given-names>C</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hasan</surname>
              <given-names>T</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>8. Kirkpatrick JN, Ky B, Rahmouni HW, Chirinos JA, Farmer SA, Fields AV, et al. Application of appropriateness criteria in outpatient transthoracic echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(1):53-9.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <article-title>Application of appropriateness criteria in outpatient transthoracic echocardiography</article-title>
          <source>J Am Soc Echocardiogr</source>
          <date>
            <year>2009</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>53</fpage>
          <lpage>9</lpage>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <volume>22</volume>
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Kirkpatrick</surname>
              <given-names>JN</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ky</surname>
              <given-names>B</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Rahmouni</surname>
              <given-names>HW</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Chirinos</surname>
              <given-names>JA</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Farmer</surname>
              <given-names>SA</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Fields</surname>
              <given-names>AV</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>9. Barbosa FC, Mesquita ET, Barachi LB, Salgado A, Kazuo R, Rosa ML, et al. Comparison of echocardiography request appropriateness between public and private hospitals. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011;97(4):281-8.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <article-title>Comparison of echocardiography request appropriateness between public and private hospitals</article-title>
          <source>Arq Bras Cardiol</source>
          <date>
            <year>2011</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>281</fpage>
          <lpage>8</lpage>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <volume>97</volume>
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Barbosa</surname>
              <given-names>FC</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Mesquita</surname>
              <given-names>ET</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Barachi</surname>
              <given-names>LB</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Salgado</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kazuo</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Rosa</surname>
              <given-names>ML</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>10. Rao G, Sajnani N, Kusnetzky LL, Main ML. Appropriate use of transthoracic echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105(11):1640-2.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <article-title>Appropriate use of transthoracic echocardiography</article-title>
          <source>Am J Cardiol</source>
          <date>
            <year>2010</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>1640</fpage>
          <lpage>2</lpage>
          <issue>11</issue>
          <volume>105</volume>
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Rao</surname>
              <given-names>G</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Sajnani</surname>
              <given-names>N</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kusnetzky</surname>
              <given-names>LL</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Main</surname>
              <given-names>ML</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
  <sub-article article-type="translation" id="TRen" xml:lang="en">
    <front-stub>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Brief Communication</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title xml:lang="en">Inadequate request of transthoracic echocardiography according to the guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <abstract xml:lang="en">
        <p>BACKGROUND: Guidelines from medical societies suggest recommendations for the appropriate request of tests. In 2009, the Brazilian Society of Cardiology (BSC) published new guidelines for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) request. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of Class III requests for TTE, as defined by the BSC Guidelines and analyze these requests profile comparing a public university hospital (PUH) with a private cardiology hospital (PCH). METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 779 consecutive outpatient TTE requests: 391 from the PCH and 388 from the PUH between December 2009 and May 2010. The indications studied were classified accordingly to the BSC guidelines. Request distribution was compared by Chi-square test. Statistical significance was set at p &lt; 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 779 requests, 61 (7.8%) were considered Class III. Of these 14 were from the public and 47 from the private hospital. The distribution of requests was statistically different between institutions (p &lt; 0.001). Check-up in asymptomatic patients was the main inadequate indication, with 37 cases (33 in the private institution- 89.18%), followed by evaluation after angioplasty in 9 cases (8 in the private institution - 88.88%); ventricular function monitoring in patients with stable heart failure in 6 cases (4 in the public institution - 66.66%), post-bypass surgery in 5 cases (4 in the private institution- 80%), and evaluation of nonspecific electrocardiographic abnormalities in 4 cases (4 in the public institution - 100%). CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic patients' assessment was the main cause of inadequate TTE requests, which differs between institutions: routine check-up in the private and heart failure in the public hospital.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Echocardiography</kwd>
        <kwd>health services misuse</kwd>
        <kwd>heart failure</kwd>
        <kwd>practice clinic guidelines</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </front-stub>
    <body>
      <p>
        <bold>BRIEF COMMUNICATION</bold>
      </p>
      <p>
        <fn id="enda-body2">
          <label>
            <bold>Inadequate request of transthoracic echocardiography according to the guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology</bold>
          </label>
          <p>
            <bold>Laiz Boniziolli Barachi; Fl&#225;via Candolo Pupo Barbosa; Samuel-Datum Moscavitch; B&#225;rbara Contarato Pilon; Gabriela Vescovi Pissinati; Evandro Tinoco Mesquita; Cl&#225;udio Tinoco Mesquita; Marcus Vinicius Santos</bold>
          </p>
        </fn>
      </p>
      <p> Hospital Universit&#225;rio Ant&#244;nio Pedro, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niter&#243;i; Hospital Pr&#243;-Card&#237;aco, Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil</p>
      <p>Mailing Address</p>
      <p>
        <bold>ABSTRACT</bold>
      </p>
      <p><bold>BACKGROUND: </bold>Guidelines from medical societies suggest recommendations for the appropriate request of tests. In 2009, the Brazilian Society of Cardiology (BSC) published new guidelines for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) request.</p>
      <p><bold>OBJECTIVE:</bold> To evaluate the prevalence of Class III requests for TTE, as defined by the BSC Guidelines and analyze these requests profile comparing a public university hospital (PUH) with a private cardiology hospital (PCH).</p>
      <p><bold>METHODS: </bold>We prospectively evaluated 779 consecutive outpatient TTE requests: 391 from the PCH and 388 from the PUH between December 2009 and May 2010. The indications studied were classified accordingly to the BSC guidelines. Request distribution was compared by Chi-square test. Statistical significance was set at p &lt; 0.05.</p>
      <p><bold>RESULTS:</bold> Of the 779 requests, 61 (7.8%) were considered Class III. Of these 14 were from the public and 47 from the private hospital. The distribution of requests was statistically different between institutions (p &lt; 0.001). Check-up in asymptomatic patients was the main inadequate indication, with 37 cases (33 in the private institution- 89.18%), followed by evaluation after angioplasty in 9 cases (8 in the private institution - 88.88%); ventricular function monitoring in patients with stable heart failure in 6 cases (4 in the public institution - 66.66%), post-bypass surgery in 5 cases (4 in the private institution- 80%), and evaluation of nonspecific electrocardiographic abnormalities in 4 cases (4 in the public institution - 100%). </p>
      <p><bold>CONCLUSION:</bold> Asymptomatic patients' assessment was the main cause of inadequate TTE requests, which differs between institutions: routine check-up in the private and heart failure in the public hospital.</p>
      <p><bold>Keywords:</bold> Echocardiography / utilization; health services misuse; heart failure; practice clinic guidelines.</p>
      <p>
        <bold>Introduction</bold>
      </p>
      <p>In recent years, the Brazilian health model has followed the technicist model of the U.S.A., which shows technological progress accompanied by an increase in the request for complementary tests. The transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) is a relatively low-cost, widely used test in the public and private sectors. In 2010, the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) performed 715,655 elective outpatient TTEs, of which 425,317 (59%) were performed in the southeastern region of the country, with an estimated total cost of R$ 30,704,597.02<sup>1</sup>. Amid this growing demand, a major challenge for cardiovascular imaging services is to maintain the quality standard<sup>2</sup>. Moreover, unnecessary test requests are common, especially in the private sector. One explanation could be the distance between the medical practice and medical societies' recommendations on the rational use of complementary tests<sup>2</sup>. </p>
      <p>In 2009, the Guidelines on Indications for Echocardiography of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology (SBC)<sup>3</sup> were published to guide physicians on the appropriate use of the TTE, to increase the diagnostic accuracy and optimize available resources. According to SBC guidelines, the requests can be classified as: Class I, when there is evidence or general acceptance that a certain procedure or treatment is useful and effective; Class II, when there is conflicting evidence and / or divergence of opinion on the usefulness/efficacy of a procedure or treatment; Class IIa, when the evidence/opinion favors usefulness/efficacy; Class IIb, when the usefulness/efficacy is less established by evidence/opinion; Class III, when there is evidence and/or general acceptance that the procedure/treatment is not useful/effective and, in some cases could be harmful <sup>3</sup>. However, few studies have evaluated the appropriateness of TTE requests according to the guidelines developed by Brazilian experts<sup>4</sup>. </p>
      <p>The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of outpatient TTE requests Class III (inadequate) according to SBC guidelines and analyze the profile of these requests, comparing them between a public university hospital (PUH) and a private cardiology hospital (PCH).</p>
      <p>
        <bold>Material and Methods</bold>
      </p>
      <p>This was a prospective and observational study, which evaluated 779 consecutive outpatient TTE requests from a private (n = 391, 50.2%) and a public (n = 388, 49.8%) institution from December 2009 to May 2010. Indications were classified based on the criteria of SBC guidelines by two medical examiners. In this study, requests were considered inadequate when classified as Class III, as recommended by SBC guidelines. The requests were previously submitted to a prospective analysis according to criteria of adequacy of the American College of Cardiology for echocardiograms<sup>5</sup>; when necessary, these criteria were adapted (ACC), correlating them with the class III indications from SBC guidelines of 2004 and 2009<sup>4</sup>. </p>
      <p>Patients older than 18 years of age were included in this study. Inpatients were excluded as well as those for whom the test request made by the attending physician was not available or readable, as well as unclassified tests. The research was previously approved by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) of UFF/ HUAP (130/2010) and of Pro-Card&#237;aco Hospital (330/2009). </p>
      <p>The results are expressed as percentage values of frequency. The comparison of differences was performed using the Chi-square (&#967;<sup>2</sup>) or Fisher's exact test. The value of statistical significance was set at p &lt; 0.05. </p>
      <p>
        <bold>Results</bold>
      </p>
      <p>Of the total 779 TTE requests, 432 were made for women (56%) and 347 for men (44%); 388 requests from the PUH and 391 from the PCH. The mean age was 59 &#177; 15 years. Of the 61 (7.8%) cases classified as inadequate, 14 (22.95%) were from PUH and 47 (77.04%) from the PCH. The mean age of patients with Class III requests was 62.3 years. There was a significant difference in the distribution of indications between institutions (p &lt; 0.001). In the PUH, 14 (3.6%) of 388 requests were classified as inadequate (Class III), whereas in the PCH, it was 47 (12%). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="en_a12cha01-body2">Chart 1</xref> shows the overall distribution of the 61 (7.8%) cases considered Class III, of which 37 cases occurred in routine check-ups (33 in the PCH; 89.18%), followed by post-angioplasty assessment in 9 patients (8 in the PCH, 88.88%). The test was also requested for the monitoring of ventricular function in patients with stable heart failure in 6 cases (4 in the PUH; 66.66%), post-CABG in 5 cases (4 in the PCH, 80%) and evaluation of nonspecific electrocardiographic abnormalities in 4 cases (4 in the PUH, 100%). Among the asymptomatic patients, 40 (65.57%) had no underlying disease.</p>
      <p content-type="asset">
        <fig id="en_a12cha01-body2">
          <graphic xlink:href="1678-4170-abc-99-04-0952-00012-gf01-en.jpg"/></fig>
      </p>
      <p>
        <bold>Discussion</bold>
      </p>
      <p>Echocardiography is one of the most widely used diagnostic methods in clinical cardiology. Recent studies<sup>6-10 </sup>have compared the quality of TTE requests according to criteria of adequacy of the American College of Cardiology (ACC). The study by Ward et al.<sup>6</sup>, which compared inadequate outpatient requests in the academic sector and in the community, found no significant difference (17% <italic>vs</italic>. 15.%, p = not significant). Similarly, Willens et al.<sup>7</sup> found no significant difference when comparing inadequate outpatient requests in the American system of veteran care (Veterans Affairs) and academic assistance practice (7% <italic>vs</italic>. 9.5%, p = 0.558). Differently in our study, when using SBC recommendations, we found a significant difference between outpatient requests Class III (inadequate) in the PUH and PCH (3.6% <italic>vs</italic>. 12%, p &lt; 0.001). </p>
      <p>Based on the criteria of adequacy of the ACC, Barbosa et al.<sup>9</sup> compared inadequate outpatient requests from the same sample described in our study (n = 779). However, the study by Barbosa et al.<sup>9</sup> found no significant difference between the inadequate requests in the PUH and the PCH (25% vs. 29%). Only the study by Rao et al.<sup>10</sup> reported such high frequency (26%) of inadequate TTE requests. ON the other hand, Kirkpatrick et al.<sup>8</sup> showed a frequency of 8%, similar to that observed in our study (7.8%). When comparing the Brazilian guidelines<sup>3</sup> with the ACC criteria<sup>5</sup>, it can be observed that SBC guidelines of 2009 only consider 41 requests as inadequate, while the ACC criteria consider 71 indications for echocardiography as inadequate. This difference suggests the need to review the current Brazilian guidelines aiming to extend its applicability. </p>
      <p>In our study, a significant difference was observed in the profile of clinical indication for TTE between the private and the public institution (p &lt; 0.001). The use of TTE for routine check-ups in asymptomatic patients and the repetition of TTE in patients without clinical alterations regarding the basal condition were the main reasons for requests Class III at the private and public institutions, respectively. </p>
      <p>The technological developments in health care and increased availability of complementary tests have promoted an exaggeration of TTE requests, many without clinical indication. In addition to high costs, the requesting of unnecessary tests overburden health services, creating difficulties for individuals to have access and increasing the time for tests to be performed, which makes the public health system slow, costly and inefficient.</p>
      <p>Considering that more than 800,000 TTEs are performed per year by SUS and that the frequency of inadequate use is 8%, it is estimated that approximately 64,000 tests are needlessly performed every year. Thus, the need to improve the management of financial resources of complementary medicine raises questions about cost-effectiveness of tests and the lack of continuing medical education programs. </p>
      <p>
        <bold>References</bold>
      </p>
    </body>
  </sub-article>
</article>
