<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="editorial" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Arq Bras Cardiol</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">abc</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Arq. Bras. Cardiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">0066-782X</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1678-4170</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id" specific-use="scielo-v3">YMrzMzzvVD7msYKRnwmn8Xt</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id" specific-use="scielo-v2">S0066-782X2019000500499</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5935/abc.20190063</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Short Editorial</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Unscheduled Return Visits to the Emergency Department after Cardiac Electronic Devices Implantation</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-6104-9113</contrib-id>
          <name>
            <surname>Costa</surname>
            <given-names>Roberto</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1"/>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <institution content-type="orgname">Universidade de S&#227;o Paulo</institution>
          <institution content-type="orgdiv1">Faculdade de Medicina</institution>
          <institution content-type="orgdiv2">Hospital das Cl&#237;nicas</institution>
          <addr-line>
            <city>S&#227;o Paulo</city>
            <state>SP</state>
          </addr-line>
          <country country="BR">Brazil</country>
          <institution content-type="original">Instituto do Cora&#231;&#227;o (InCor) do Hospital das Cl&#237;nicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de S&#227;o Paulo (HC-FMUSP), S&#227;o Paulo, SP - Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="c1"><bold>Mailing Address: Roberto Costa,</bold> Av. Dr. En&#233;as de Carvalho Aguiar, 44, Bloco II, 2&#186; andar, sala 3. Postal Code 05403-900, S&#227;o Paulo, SP - Brazil. E-mail: <email>rcosta@incor.usp.br</email>
				</corresp>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
        <day>06</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2019</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
        <month>05</month>
        <year>2019</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>112</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>499</fpage>
      <lpage>500</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
          <license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <title>Keywords</title>
        <kwd>Pacemaker, Artificial/utilization</kwd>
        <kwd>Intraoperative Complications/mortality</kwd>
        <kwd>Defibrillators, Implantable</kwd>
        <kwd>Heart Failure</kwd>
        <kwd>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <p>In recent years, many initiatives have been made to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare services leading to the creation and standardization of health quality indicators in order to improve the interaction between clinicians, researchers, and healthcare managers, enabling the generation of evidence-based strategies. In this context, the rate of hospital readmissions is one of the most important indicators to measure the quality of healthcare services.</p>
    <p>The use of quality indicators to measure healthcare performance across different hospitals has been considered of great value for the improvement of healthcare routines, enhancing the expenditure rationalization of health services. In this scenario, the adoption of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) as a strategy to measure outcomes across hospitals has increased worldwide and it is now gaining familiarity among Brazilian hospitals.</p>
    <p>Specifically in heart failure patients, the quality indicators can be measured by hard outcomes such as mortality, hospital readmissions or unscheduled visits to the emergency department. However, other measures should also be taken into account, especially patient-reported outcomes as quality of life, functional capacity, as well as the adherence to the treatment in terms of medications, diet and physical rehabilitation. In this sense, discharge instruction regarding the prescribed medications, dietary restrictions, regular physical activities, weight monitoring and the importance of follow-up appointments play a significant role in the promotion of successful treatment. Another factor of great impact for the success of the treatment is the close contact between the healthcare providers and the patient, by telephone or text messages, in order to reinforce the main instructions and to detect early signs of clinical decompensation. From this perspective, knowing the rate of unscheduled visits may be a good start for evaluating our results.</p>
    <p>The study of Warpechowski Neto et al.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref> showed a high incidence of unplanned visits after defibrillators (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices implantation. Device-related complications were seen in 7% of readmitted patients. On the other hand, in 24.6% of the patients, the reason for an unscheduled visit was cardiac and non-cardiac clinical conditions.</p>
    <p>A 12-month follow-up study of 713 patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) procedures, published by Silva et al.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref> in 2016 the Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, showed that the odds of new readmission in CRT patients was 1.6 times higher than in the general group of patients studied and that ICD implant increased this chance by 4.2 times. This study also showed that the mortality was 2.2 times higher in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and 2.3 times higher in those who used warfarin.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>
		</p>
    <p>In a prospective multicenter study conducted by the Instituto do Cora&#231;&#227;o do Hospital das Cl&#237;nicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de S&#227;o Paulo, which included 3,550 patients from 9 geographically distributed cardiology centers, the 12-month readmission rate was 23.8%, 24.0% and 38.3% and the mortality rate was 9.4%, 11.5% and 18.3%, respectively, for ICD, CRT-P and CRT-D initial implantation. Device-related complications, heart failure decompensation and non-cardiac causes were the reason for readmissions in 15.5%, 22.1% and 19.2% of patients and for death in 3.7%, 15.7% and 51.8%, respectively.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>
		</p>
    <p>Analysis of the United States Nationwide Readmissions Database, which included 70,223 patients submitted to CIED implantation, showed a 30-day hospital readmission rate of 12%. Besides identifying several readmission predictors, mostly related to patient's comorbidities, these 30-day readmissions resulted in an additional median cost of US $30,692 per patient, which reinforces the importance of establishing strategies to reduce in-hospital readmissions.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>
		</p>
    <p>Analysis of the above-mentioned information shows the great importance of monitoring outcomes in CIED patients after the hospital discharge. In this sense, the conduction of prospective registries for all CIED types and procedures will provide us with more accurate information about the clinical practice in a real-world scenario. Ultimately, this knowledge will be critical for physicians, hospitals, and healthcare payers to know the results of their activities, in order to improve patient outcomes, while reducing costs. As important as knowing our results is to establish strategies to minimize complications. And certainly, reducing the rate of unscheduled visits should be a clear goal to be pursued.</p>
  </body>
  <back>
    <fn-group>
      <fn fn-type="other">
        <p>Short Editorial related to the article: Unscheduled Emergency Visits after Cardiac Devices Implantation: Comparison between Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in less than one year of Follow Up</p>
      </fn>
    </fn-group>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1</label>
        <mixed-citation>1 Wapechowski Neto S, Ley LLG, Almeida ED, Saffi MAL, Dutra LZ, Ley AL, et al. Consultas n&#227;o programadas em emerg&#234;ncia ap&#243;s implante de dispositivos card&#237;acos: comparativo entre cardiodesfibriladores e ressincronizadores em seguimento inferior a 1 ano. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019; 112(5):491-498</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Wapechowski</surname>
              <given-names>S</given-names>
              <suffix>Neto</suffix>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ley</surname>
              <given-names>LLG</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Almeida</surname>
              <given-names>ED</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Saffi</surname>
              <given-names>MAL</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Dutra</surname>
              <given-names>LZ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ley</surname>
              <given-names>AL</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Consultas n&#227;o programadas em emerg&#234;ncia ap&#243;s implante de dispositivos card&#237;acos: comparativo entre cardiodesfibriladores e ressincronizadores em seguimento inferior a 1 ano</article-title>
          <source>Arq Bras Cardiol</source>
          <year>2019</year>
          <volume>112</volume>
          <issue>5</issue>
          <fpage>491</fpage>
          <lpage>498</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2</label>
        <mixed-citation>2 Silva KR, Albertini CMM, Crevelari ES, Carvalho EIJ, Fiorelli AI, Martinelli Filho M, Costa R. Complica&#231;&#245;es ap&#243;s procedimentos cir&#250;rgicos em portadores de dispositivos card&#237;acos eletr&#244;nicos implant&#225;veis: resultados de um registro prospectivo. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016;107(3):245-56.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Silva</surname>
              <given-names>KR</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Albertini</surname>
              <given-names>CMM</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Crevelari</surname>
              <given-names>ES</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Carvalho</surname>
              <given-names>EIJ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Fiorelli</surname>
              <given-names>AI</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Martinelli</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
              <suffix>Filho</suffix>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Costa</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Complica&#231;&#245;es ap&#243;s procedimentos cir&#250;rgicos em portadores de dispositivos card&#237;acos eletr&#244;nicos implant&#225;veis: resultados de um registro prospectivo</article-title>
          <source>Arq Bras Cardiol</source>
          <year>2016</year>
          <volume>107</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>245</fpage>
          <lpage>256</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3</label>
        <mixed-citation>3 Silva KR, Alves LBO, Kawauchi TS, Maurino IC, Melo GRGO, Barros JV , et al. Developing an adverse events reporting system to measure real-world outcomes of cardiac implantable electronic devices. In: ESC Congress 2016, Rome, Italy. Eur Heart J.2016;37(Suppl 1):18.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Silva</surname>
              <given-names>KR</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Alves</surname>
              <given-names>LBO</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kawauchi</surname>
              <given-names>TS</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Maurino</surname>
              <given-names>IC</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Melo</surname>
              <given-names>GRGO</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Barros</surname>
              <given-names>JV</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Developing an adverse events reporting system to measure real-world outcomes of cardiac implantable electronic devices. In: ESC Congress 2016, Rome, Italy</article-title>
          <source>Eur Heart J</source>
          <year>2016</year>
          <volume>37</volume>
          <supplement>Suppl 1</supplement>
          <fpage>18</fpage>
          <lpage>18</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4</label>
        <mixed-citation>4 Patel B, Sablani N, Garg J, Chaudhary R, Shah M, Gupta R, et al. Thirty-day readmissions after cardiac implantable electronic devices in the United States: Insights from the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(5):708-15.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Patel</surname>
              <given-names>B</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Sablani</surname>
              <given-names>N</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Garg</surname>
              <given-names>J</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Chaudhary</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Shah</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gupta</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Thirty-day readmissions after cardiac implantable electronic devices in the United States: Insights from the Nationwide Readmissions Database</article-title>
          <source>Heart Rhythm</source>
          <year>2018</year>
          <volume>15</volume>
          <issue>5</issue>
          <fpage>708</fpage>
          <lpage>715</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
  <sub-article article-type="translation" id="s1" xml:lang="pt">
    <front-stub>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Minieditorial</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Consultas n&#227;o Programadas em Emerg&#234;ncia ap&#243;s Implante de Dispositivos Card&#237;acos</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-6104-9113</contrib-id>
          <name>
            <surname>Costa</surname>
            <given-names>Roberto</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c2"/>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <institution content-type="original">Instituto do Cora&#231;&#227;o (InCor) do Hospital das Cl&#237;nicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de S&#227;o Paulo (HC-FMUSP), S&#227;o Paulo, SP - Brasil</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="c2"><bold>Correspond&#234;ncia: Roberto Costa,</bold> Av. Dr. En&#233;as de Carvalho Aguiar, 44, Bloco II, 2&#186; andar, sala 3. CEP 05403-900, S&#227;o Paulo, SP - Brasil. E-mail: <email>rcosta@incor.usp.br</email>
				</corresp>
      </author-notes>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="pt">
        <title>Palavras-chave</title>
        <kwd>Marcapasso Artificial/utiliza&#231;&#227;o</kwd>
        <kwd>Complica&#231;&#245;es Intraoperat&#243;rias/mortalidade</kwd>
        <kwd>Desfibriladores Implant&#225;veis</kwd>
        <kwd>Insufici&#234;ncia Card&#237;aca</kwd>
        <kwd>Estimula&#231;&#227;o Card&#237;aca Artificial</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </front-stub>
    <body>
      <p>Nos &#250;ltimos anos, a busca pela qualidade e efici&#234;ncia dos servi&#231;os de sa&#250;de tem impulsionado a cria&#231;&#227;o e a padroniza&#231;&#227;o de indicadores que possam auxiliar na intera&#231;&#227;o entre especialistas, pesquisadores e gestores de sa&#250;de, possibilitando a gera&#231;&#227;o de evid&#234;ncias para orientar a&#231;&#245;es estrat&#233;gicas. Nesse contexto, a taxa de readmiss&#245;es hospitalares &#233; um dos mais importantes indicadores da qualidade do atendimento prestado por servi&#231;os de sa&#250;de.</p>
      <p>O uso de indicadores de qualidade da assist&#234;ncia m&#233;dica prestada tem sido considerado fundamental, tanto para a melhoria das rotinas assistenciais dos pr&#243;prios hospitais, quanto para a racionaliza&#231;&#227;o dos gastos das fontes pagadoras. Nesse cen&#225;rio, a ado&#231;&#227;o de padr&#245;es para medir os resultados entre os hospitais, como os desenvolvidos pelo <italic>Intenational Consortim for Health Outcomes Measurement</italic> (ICHOM), aumentou em todo o mundo e agora est&#225; ganhando familiaridade entre os hospitais brasileiros.</p>
      <p>No caso espec&#237;fico do atendimento a pacientes com insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca, a qualidade da assist&#234;ncia pode ser avaliada por desfechos duros, como as taxas de mortalidade, readmiss&#245;es hospitalares ou de consultas n&#227;o programadas. Mas tamb&#233;m devem ser consideradas outras medidas, especialmente os desfechos reportados pelos pacientes, que envolvem desde a qualidade de vida e a capacidade funcional at&#233; a ades&#227;o &#224;s medidas terap&#234;uticas medicamentosas, nutricionais e de reabilita&#231;&#227;o f&#237;sica. Nesse sentido, a orienta&#231;&#227;o oferecida aos pacientes no momento da alta hospitalar quanto &#224; correta tomada dos medicamentos, suas restri&#231;&#245;es diet&#233;ticas, necessidade de exerc&#237;cios f&#237;sicos, observa&#231;&#227;o do peso corporal e retorno para as avalia&#231;&#245;es programadas tamb&#233;m tem papel fundamental no sucesso do tratamento. Outro fator de grande impacto para o sucesso do tratamento &#233; o contato mais pr&#243;ximo entre a equipe de sa&#250;de e o paciente, por telefone ou por mensagens de texto, no sentido de refor&#231;ar as orienta&#231;&#245;es e detectar sinais precoces de descompensa&#231;&#227;o cl&#237;nica. Nessa perspectiva, conhecer a taxa de consultas n&#227;o programadas pode ser um bom come&#231;o para avalia&#231;&#227;o de nossos resultados.</p>
      <p>O artigo de Warpechowski Neto et al.,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref> mostrou que a taxa de ocorr&#234;ncia de visitas n&#227;o programadas dos pacientes submetidos ao primeiro implante de dispositivos, cardiodesfibrilador (CDI) ou terapia de ressincroniza&#231;&#227;o card&#237;aca (TRC), foi alta, tendo sido de 7% em fun&#231;&#227;o de problemas relacionados ao dispositivo implantado e de 24,6%, por problemas cl&#237;nicos card&#237;acos e n&#227;o card&#237;acos.</p>
      <p>Em artigo publicado em 2016 nos Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, Silva et al.,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref> ao avaliar os primeiros 12 meses de evolu&#231;&#227;o ap&#243;s a alta hospitalar de 713 pacientes que, consecutivamente, foram submetidos a procedimentos de estimula&#231;&#227;o card&#237;aca artificial permanente, mostraram que a chance de um paciente submetido ao implante de ressincronizador card&#237;aco necessitar de uma readmiss&#227;o hospitalar &#233; 1,6 vezes maior que do grupo geral dos pacientes estudados, e que o implante de CDI aumentou essa chance em 4,2 vezes. Este estudo tamb&#233;m mostrou que a mortalidade foi 2,2 vezes maior em pacientes com disfun&#231;&#227;o ventricular esquerda e 2,3 vezes maior naqueles que usavam warfarina.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>
			</p>
      <p>Um estudo multic&#234;ntrico liderado pelo Instituto do Cora&#231;&#227;o do Hospital das Cl&#237;nicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de S&#227;o Paulo, que contou com dados de outros 9 hospitais de quatro regi&#245;es brasileiras e incluiu 3.550 pacientes submetidos a todos os tipos de procedimento e de dispositivos card&#237;acos eletr&#244;nicos implant&#225;veis (DCEI), mostrou que a taxa de readmiss&#227;o hospitalar aos 12 meses de seguimento foi de 23,8%, 24,0% e de 38,3% e a de mortalidade foi de 9,4%, 11,5% e de 18,3%, respectivamente para CDI, TRC-MP e TRC-D. Problemas relacionados ao implante do dispositivo, descompensa&#231;&#227;o de insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca e causas n&#227;o cardiol&#243;gicas foram o motivo das readmiss&#245;es em 15,5%, 22,1% e 19,2% dos pacientes e do &#243;bito em 3,7%, 15,7% e 51,8%, respectivamente.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>
			</p>
      <p>Em uma an&#225;lise do Banco Nacional de Readmiss&#245;es Hospitalares (<italic>Nationwide Readmissions Database</italic>) dos Estados Unidos, na qual foram inclu&#237;dos 70.223 procedimentos de implante inicial de DCEI, a taxa de readmiss&#227;o hospitalar em 30 dias foi de 12%. Al&#233;m de identificarem fatores preditores de readmiss&#227;o, em sua maioria relacionados &#224; presen&#231;a de comorbidades, os autores relataram que esses epis&#243;dios de readmiss&#227;o hospitalar representaram um custo mediano adicional de US $30.692 por paciente, o que corrobora a import&#226;ncia de estabelecermos estrat&#233;gias para reduzir esse tipo de intercorr&#234;ncia.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>
			</p>
      <p>A an&#225;lise das informa&#231;&#245;es acima citadas mostra a grande import&#226;ncia de se aferir os resultados obtidos com o uso de DCEI ap&#243;s a alta hospitalar. Nesse sentido, a cria&#231;&#227;o de registros prospectivos para o acompanhamento dos pacientes submetidos a tratamento pelos diversos tipos de dispositivos existentes permite a obten&#231;&#227;o de informa&#231;&#245;es mais precisas sob a perspectiva da pr&#225;tica cl&#237;nica real. Em &#250;ltima an&#225;lise, esse conhecimento ser&#225; fundamental para que m&#233;dicos, hospitais e fontes pagadoras conhe&#231;am os resultados obtidos por suas atividades a fim de se aprimorarem. T&#227;o importante quanto conhecer nossos resultados &#233; estabelecer estrat&#233;gias para minimizar complica&#231;&#245;es. E certamente reduzir a taxa de consultas n&#227;o programadas deve ser um objetivo claro a ser perseguido.</p>
    </body>
    <back>
      <fn-group>
        <fn fn-type="other">
          <p>Minieditorial referente ao artigo: Consultas N&#227;o Programadas em Emerg&#234;ncia ap&#243;s Implante de Dispositivos Card&#237;acos: Comparativo entre Cardiodesfibriladores e Ressincronizadores em Seguimento Inferior a 1 Ano</p>
        </fn>
      </fn-group>
    </back>
  </sub-article>
</article>
