<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" dtd-version="1.0" specific-use="sps-1.1" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Arq Bras Cardiol</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Arq. Bras. Cardiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">0066-782X</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1678-4170</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id" specific-use="scielo-v3">Rmg5tcq3fGPg4sgrbdzx6Gj</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id" specific-use="scielo-v2">S0066-782X2015000600007</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id" specific-use="previous-pid">S0066-782X2015000600007</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="other">00007</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5935/abc.20150035</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Original Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Circulatory and Ventilatory Power: Characterization in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Castello-Sim&#245;es</surname>
            <given-names>Viviane</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c01"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Minatel</surname>
            <given-names>Vinicius</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Karsten</surname>
            <given-names>Marlus</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff02">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Sim&#245;es</surname>
            <given-names>Rodrigo Polaquini</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Perseguini</surname>
            <given-names>Nat&#225;lia Maria</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Milan</surname>
            <given-names>Juliana Cristina</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Arena</surname>
            <given-names>Ross</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff03">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Neves</surname>
            <given-names>Laura Maria Tomazi</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Borghi-Silva</surname>
            <given-names>Audrey</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Catai</surname>
            <given-names>Aparecida Maria</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff01">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff01">
        <label>1</label>
        <institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal de S&#227;o Carlos</institution>
        <institution content-type="orgdiv1">N&#250;cleo de Pesquisa em Exerc&#237;cio F&#237;sico</institution>
        <institution content-type="orgdiv2">Laborat&#243;rio de Fisioterapia Cardiovascular</institution>
        <addr-line>
          <named-content content-type="city">S&#227;o Carlos</named-content>
          <named-content content-type="state">SP</named-content>
        </addr-line>
        <country>Brazil</country>
        <institution content-type="normalized">Universidade Federal de S&#227;o Carlos</institution>
        <institution content-type="original">Laborat&#243;rio de Fisioterapia Cardiovascular, N&#250;cleo de Pesquisa em Exerc&#237;cio F&#237;sico, Universidade Federal de S&#227;o Carlos, S&#227;o Carlos, SP, Brazil</institution>
      </aff>
      <aff id="aff02">
        <label>2</label>
        <institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal de Ci&#234;ncias da Sa&#250;de de Porto Alegre</institution>
        <institution content-type="orgdiv1">Departamento de Fisioterapia</institution>
        <addr-line>
          <named-content content-type="city">Porto Alegre</named-content>
          <named-content content-type="state">RS</named-content>
        </addr-line>
        <country>Brazil</country>
        <institution content-type="normalized">Universidade Federal de Ci&#234;ncias da Sa&#250;de de Porto Alegre</institution>
        <institution content-type="original">Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de Ci&#234;ncias da Sa&#250;de de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS &#8211; Brazil</institution>
      </aff>
      <aff id="aff03">
        <label>3</label>
        <institution content-type="orgname">Universidade de Illinois Chicago</institution>
        <institution content-type="orgdiv1">Faculdade de Ci&#234;ncias Aplicadas da Sa&#250;de</institution>
        <institution content-type="orgdiv2">Departamento de Fisioterapia e Laborat&#243;rio de Fisiologia Integrativa</institution>
        <addr-line>
          <named-content content-type="city">Chicago</named-content>
          <named-content content-type="state">IL</named-content>
        </addr-line>
        <country>USA</country>
        <institution content-type="original">Departamento de Fisioterapia e Laborat&#243;rio de Fisiologia Integrativa, Faculdade de Ci&#234;ncias Aplicadas da Sa&#250;de, Universidade de Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL &#8211; USA</institution>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="c01"><bold>Mailing Address: Viviane Castello-Sim&#245;es</bold>, Universidade Federal de S&#227;o Carlos &#8211; Departamento de Fisioterapia. Rodovia Washington Luis km 235, Jardim Guanabara. Postal Code 13565-905, S&#227;o Carlos, SP &#8211; Brazil. E-mail:   <email>vivica_castello@yahoo.com.br</email></corresp>
        <fn fn-type="con">
          <p>
            <bold>Author contributions</bold>
          </p>
          <p>Conception and design of the research:Castello-Sim&#245;es V, Catai AM. Acquisition of data:Castello-Sim&#245;es V, Minatel V, Karsten M, Sim&#245;es RP, Perseguini NM, Milan JC, Neves LMT. Analysis and interpretation of the data: Castello-Sim&#245;es V, Minatel V, Karsten M, Sim&#245;es RP, Perseguini NM, Milan JC, Arena R, Neves LMT, Catai AM. Statistical analysis: Castello-Sim&#245;es V, Minatel V, Karsten M, Sim&#245;es RP, Neves LMT, Borghi-Silva A. Obtaining financing: Castello-Sim&#245;es V, Karsten M, Perseguini NM, Catai AM. Writing of the manuscript:Castello-Sim&#245;es V, Karsten M, Sim&#245;es RP, Catai AM. Critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content: Castello-Sim&#245;es V, Sim&#245;es RP, Arena R, Borghi-Silva A, Catai AM.</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="conflict">
          <p>
            <bold>Potential Conflict of Interest</bold>
          </p>
          <p>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2015</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>05</day>
        <month>05</month>
        <year>2015</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>104</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>476</fpage>
      <lpage>485</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>08</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2014</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>23</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2015</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>23</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2015</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/">
          <license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <sec>
          <title>Background:</title>
          <p>Circulatory power (CP) and ventilatory power (VP) are indices that have been used for the clinical evaluation of patients with heart failure; however, no study has evaluated these indices in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) without heart failure.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Objective:</title>
          <p>To characterize both indices in patients with CAD compared with healthy controls.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Methods:</title>
          <p>Eighty-seven men [CAD group = 42 subjects and healthy control group (CG) = 45 subjects] aged 40&#8211;65 years were included. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing was performed on a treadmill and the following parameters were measured: 1) peak oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>), 2) peak heart rate (HR), 3) peak blood pressure (BP), 4) peak rate-pressure product (peak systolic HR x peak BP), 5) peak oxygen pulse (peak VO<sub>2</sub>/peak HR), 6) oxygen uptake efficiency (OUES), 7) carbon dioxide production efficiency (minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope), 8) CP (peak VO<sub>2</sub> x peak systolic BP) and 9) VP (peak systolic BP/carbon dioxide production efficiency).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Results:</title>
          <p>The CAD group had significantly lower values for peak VO<sub>2</sub> (p &lt; 0.001), peak HR (p &lt; 0.001), peak systolic BP (p &lt; 0.001), peak rate-pressure product (p &lt; 0.001), peak oxygen pulse (p = 0.008), OUES (p &lt; 0.001), CP (p &lt; 0.001), and VP (p &lt; 0.001) and significantly higher values for peak diastolic BP (p = 0.004) and carbon dioxide production efficiency (p &lt; 0.001) compared with CG. Stepwise regression analysis showed that CP was influenced by group (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.44, p &lt; 0.001) and VP was influenced by both group and number of vessels with stenosis after treatment (interaction effects: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.46, p &lt; 0.001).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Conclusion:</title>
          <p>The indices CP and VP were lower in men with CAD than healthy controls.</p>
        </sec>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Exercise</kwd>
        <kwd>Oxygen Uptake</kwd>
        <kwd>Cardiopulmonary Exercise</kwd>
        <kwd>Cardiovascular Disease</kwd>
        <kwd>Adults</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <funding-group>
        <award-group>
          <funding-source>Funda&#231;&#227;o de Amparo &#224; Pesquisa do Estado de S&#227;o Paulo (FAPESP)</funding-source>
          <award-id>2010/52070-4</award-id>
        </award-group>
        <award-group>
          <funding-source>Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient&#237;fico e Tenol&#243;gico (CNPq)</funding-source>
          <award-id>483945/2007-2</award-id>
        </award-group>
        <funding-statement>This study was funded by Funda&#231;&#227;o de Amparo &#224; Pesquisa do Estado de S&#227;o Paulo (FAPESP), S&#227;o Paulo/SP/Brasil (processo: 2010/52070-4); Coordena&#231;&#227;o de Aperfei&#231;oamento de Pessoal de N&#237;vel Superior (CAPES), Bras&#237;lia/DF/Brasil; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient&#237;fico e Tenol&#243;gico (CNPq), Bras&#237;lia/DF/Brasil (processo: 483945/2007-2).</funding-statement>
      </funding-group>
      <counts>
        <fig-count count="4"/>
        <table-count count="6"/>
        <equation-count count="0"/>
        <ref-count count="39"/>
        <page-count count="10"/>
      </counts>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="intro">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is considered the gold standard for evaluating the response to aerobic exertion in patients with cardiovascular diseases to determine the physiological mechanisms of exercise intolerance<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B01">1</xref>. Some indices, such as peak oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>), carbon dioxide production eficiency derived from the linear relationship between minute ventilation (VE) and carbon dioxide production (VCO<sub>2</sub>) (VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>slope)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B02">2</xref> and oxygen uptake efficiency (OUES), derived from the linear relationship between VO<sub>2</sub> and VE<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B03">3</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B04">4</xref>, have been used to assess healthy subjects<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B02">2</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B04">4</xref>, patients with heart failure<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B05">5</xref><sup>-</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B08">8</xref> and with other forms of heart disease<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B09">9</xref>, such as coronary artery disease (CAD)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>. Circulatory power (CP) is a less frequently assessed variable obtained from CPX and calculated as the product of peak VO<sub>2</sub> and peak systolic blood pressure (BP). CP has shown some potential for clinical utility<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref><sup>-</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref> and has been proposed as a surrogate for cardiac power. This index has also been shown to be an independent predictor of mortality, with a lower CP portending a worse prognosis<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>. More recently, Forman et al. (2012)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref> introduced and evaluated the prognostic use of a novel index, named ventilatory power (VP), which was calculated by dividing peak systolic BP by the VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope. According to the authors, better prognosis is reflected by a higher VP value, i.e., greater systolic BP and/or lower VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope.</p>
      <p>While these variables have been assessed in heart failure cohorts, we are unaware of any previous study that evaluated the CP and VP indices in CAD patients without heart failure who were managed using standard medication, angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Thus, the purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that both CP and VP would be significantly lower in these CAD patients compared with healthy controls; therefore, could provide another potentially valuable measure of cardiopulmonary function in these patients.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="methods">
      <title>Methods</title>
      <p>This is an observational, cross-sectional, comparative study.</p>
      <sec>
        <title>Participants</title>
        <p>Men between 40&#8211;65 years of age were allocated to two groups: 1) patients with CAD confirmed by cardiac catheterization (CAD-G) and without heart failure and 2) an apparently healthy control group (CG). Subjects in CAD-G were recruited through a local hospital (hemodynamic section) and CG subjects were identified from a registry database in our laboratory and contacted to determine interest. Subjects were invited to participate in this study between June 2008 and April 2013. The inclusion criteria for CAD-G were: 1) CAD patients with or without myocardial infarction (1 month to 3 years since the event) optimally managed using current standard pharmacologic regimens and potentially: a) mechanical or chemical reperfusion and/or b) CABG surgery (6 months to 3 years post-surgery) and 2) preserved left ventricular function with an ejection fraction &gt; 50%. Inclusion criteria for CG were: 1) apparently healthy based on clinical examination and 2) no use of prescription medications. The exclusion criteria for both groups were: 1) body mass index (BMI) &#8805; 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 2) use of tobacco, 3) habitual drinking or illegal drug use, 4) orthopedic limitations, 5) neurological disease, 6) diabetes, 7) uncontrolled systemic arterial hypertension, 8) functional capacity &#8804; 4 metabolic equivalents, 9) lung diseases, 10) inappropriate behavior of BP to exertion, 11) malignant ventricular arrhythmia, 12) atrial fibrillation, 13) complex ectopic ventricular beats, 14) supraventricular or sinus tachycardia, 15) 2&#186; and 3&#186; atrioventricular block, 16) fixed frequency pacemaker, and 17) participation in a regular exercise program in the last 6 months. This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1975). Written informed consent was obtained from each individual before the initiation of the study.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
        <title>Clinical examination</title>
        <p>Prior to study initiation, all subjects underwent a clinical evaluation to characterize their clinical status. The evaluation comprised: 1) clinical cardiac examination; 2) resting ECG (Ecafix TC 500, S&#227;o Paulo, S&#227;o Paulo, Brazil); 3) maximal standard exercise test on a treadmill (DIGISTRESS Vega, Digitronica, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil); and 4) laboratory measurements: glycemia, hemoglobin, lipid profile, urea, creatinine, and uric acid. Subjects discontinued pharmacological prior to the exercise test, which was conducted by a physician using the Bruce protocol<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref> in accordance with the American Thoracic Society recommendations<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B01">1</xref>, Symptoms of dyspnea and leg fatigue were assessed using the modified Borg scale<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref> and all subjects were asked about the occurrence of angina at each stage of the exercise protocol.. After a minimum resting period of 48 h, all eligible subjects performed CPX.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
        <title>Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX)</title>
        <p>On the same day as CPX, the maximal walking velocity on a treadmill (Master ATL, Inbramed, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil) was determined for all subjects. The starting treadmill speed was set at 3.0 km/h without elevation, with subsequent 0.5 km/h increases in speed every 30 s. At this point, the speed was increased or decreased by 0.1 km/h until the subjects reached a maximal comfortable walking cadence without running<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>. After determining the maximal walking velocity, symptom-limited CPX was performed using a calibrated ventilatory expired gas unit (CPX-D, Medical Graphics, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States) according to a ramping protocol: 1) 1 min at rest; 2) an incremental phase, beginning at an initial speed of 0.8 km/h until maximal walking velocity was reached; 3) 0.5% increase in incline grade every 15 s; 4) 1 min of active recovery at 3.0 km/h; and 5) 5 min of passive recovery. Ventilatory expired gases were collected breath-by-breath and calculated as moving means after every eight respiratory cycles (Breeze Suite 6.4.1, Medical Graphics, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>. The criteria for test termination were based on current exercise guidelines<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>.</p>
        <p>Throughout CPX, ECG (12 simultaneous leads) and heart rate (HR) were monitored and registered (WinCardio, Micromed, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil). Delta of HR was expressed as peak HR minus HR at rest and the predicted maximum HR was calculated as 220 minus age in years. The BP was measured at rest, every 2 min during the test and throughout recovery (BD, S&#227;o Paulo, S&#227;o Paulo, Brazil). Perceived exertion (symptoms of dyspnea and leg fatigue) was assessed using the modified Borg scale<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref> and all subjects were asked about the occurrence of angina and symptoms at each stage of the exercise protocol, according to current exercise guidelines<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>.</p>
        <p>Peak VO<sub>2</sub> and peak respiratory exchange ratio (RER) (defined as the ratio between VCO<sub>2</sub> and VO<sub>2</sub>) were expressed as the highest averaged values observed during the last 30 s of exercise<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>. The VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope and the OUES were calculated from the initiation of exercise to peak<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>. The VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope was obtained by analyzing the linear relationship between VE and VCO<sub>2</sub>, with VE on the y-axis and VCO<sub>2</sub> on the x-axis<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B02">2</xref>. The OUES was obtained by analyzing the linear relationship between VO<sub>2</sub> and VE, with VO<sub>2</sub> on the y-axis and the log&#8209;transformation of VE on the x-axis<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B03">3</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B04">4</xref>. Other variables were calculated: 1) peak rate-pressure product (RPP) = product of peak systolic BP and peak HR; 2) peak oxygen pulse = peak VO<sub>2</sub>divided by the peak HR; 3) CP = product of peak VO<sub>2</sub> and peak systolic BP<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref> and 4) VP = peak systolic BP divided by the VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
        <title>Statistical analysis</title>
        <p>Based on a pilot study using VP and CP as endpoints (CAD-G = 5 individuals; CG = 5 individuals), a sample size for the current study that would provide sufficient statistical power (&#946; = 0.8) to detect an important difference (&#945; = 0.05) was estimated to be 12 and 21 subjects (VP and CP, respectively) in each group (GPower software package, version 3.1.6, Kiel, Schleswig&#8211;Holstein, Germany). The Kolmogorov&#8211;Smirnov test was used to investigate the data distribution. Continuous quantitative variables were expressed as mean &#177; standard deviation (SD) and categorical variables as absolute values and percentages. Subjective data (dyspnea and leg fatigue) were expressed as median &#177; [minimum &#8722; maximum]. The unpaired Student&#8217;s <italic>t</italic>-test was used to compare the continuous quantitative variables between CAD-G and CG. Fisher&#8217;s exact test was used to compare the categorical variables between groups and the situations after versus before treatment. Stepwise regression analysis was performed to determine the possible influence of group, medications, risk factors (hypertension and dyslipidemia) and number of vessels with stenosis after treatment on the main studied variables (HR, BP, VO<sub>2</sub>, VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope, CP and VP). One-way ANOVA (followed by Tukey&#8217;s post-hoc test) was performed after subdividing CAD-G according to the type of event and treatment to assess possible differences between subgroups. Pearson correlation analysis was applied to determine the relationships between CP or VP and peak VO<sub>2</sub>, OUES, RPP and oxygen pulse. The probability of type 1 error occurrence was established at 5% for all tests (p &lt; 0.05). SPSS (version 17.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, United States) was used to perform the statistical analysis.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="results">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>Of a total of 97 apparently healthy subjects, we excluded 52 subjects aged &lt; 40 or &gt; 65 years. Forty-five subjects were contacted and recruited for CG. In relation to CAD-G, 54 subjects were recruited; however, 12 were excluded after clinical examination because of BMI &#8805; 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (n = 2), use of tobacco (n = 2), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 2), presence of cardiac arrhythmias (n = 2), uncontrolled systemic arterial hypertension (n = 1), restenosis after mechanical reperfusion (n = 2), and inability to perform the maximal standard exercise test (n = 1). Thus, our sample consisted of 87 men (45 in CG and 42 in CAD-G). It is important to emphasize that a preliminary analysis (one-way ANOVA) was performed by dividing CAD-G into subgroups according to the type event and treatment. There were no significant differences between subgroups pertinent to any of the studied variables; thus, we pooled the data of all patients in CAD-G.</p>
      <p>The characteristics of CAD-G and CG are presented in Table 1. No significant difference was found between groups with regard to age (p = 0.087), height (p = 0.318), weight (p = 0.165), and BMI (p = 0.222). In relation to the clinical data of CAD-G before treatment, most patients had two vessels with stenosis (33%), and considering only the 41 subjects with stenosis, the vessel most affected was the anterior descending artery (78%). After treatment, most patients had one-vessel stenosis (48%), and considering only the 29 subjects with stenosis, the vessel most affected was the left circumflex artery (45%). Most subjects in CAD-G (76%) previously suffered a myocardial infarction and had been managed in the following ways: 1) only with standard medication (2%), 2) angioplasty (60%), and 3) CABG (14%). The remaining subjects in the experimental group had CAD with no previous myocardial infarction (24%) and had been managed with: 1) medication only (5%), 2) angioplasty (7%), and 3) CABG (12%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t01">Table 1</xref>). Of the 42 subjects in CAD-G, 15 had a past smoking history and none was diabetic; furthermore, 38 subjects were diagnosed with systemic arterial hypertension and 39 with dyslipidemia; both risk factors were managed pharmacologically. Of the 45 subjects in CG, three had a past smoking history and none had a diagnosis of diabetes, systemic arterial hypertension or dyslipidemia. None of the CG subjects used any prescribed medication (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t01">Table 1</xref>).</p>
      <table-wrap id="t01">
        <label>Table 1</label>
        <caption>
          <title>Characteristics of CAD-G and CG</title>
        </caption>
        <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th>&#160;</th>
              <th colspan="2" align="center">
                <bold>CAD-G (n = 42)</bold>
              </th>
              <th align="center">
                <bold>CG (n = 45)</bold>
              </th>
              <th align="center">
                <bold>p value</bold>
              </th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>Age, years</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">54.3 &#177; 6.6</td>
              <td align="center">53.9 &#177; 6.4</td>
              <td align="center">0.087</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="5">
                <bold>Anthropometry</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Height, m</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">1.70 &#177; 0.07</td>
              <td align="center">1.73 &#177; 0.13</td>
              <td align="center">0.318</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Weight, kg</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">79.0 &#177; 12.3</td>
              <td align="center">76.9 &#177; 9.9</td>
              <td align="center">0.165</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Body mass index, kg/m<sup>2</sup></td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">27 &#177; 3.9</td>
              <td align="center">26 &#177; 5.9</td>
              <td align="center">0.222</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="5">
                <bold>Cardiac function</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>LVEF, %</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">63.9 &#177; 7.1</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Vessels with stenosis, n (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td align="center">
                <bold>Before treatment (n = 42)</bold>
              </td>
              <td align="center">
                <bold>After treatment (n = 42)</bold>
              </td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">&#160;</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Without stenosis</td>
              <td align="center">1 (2)</td>
              <td align="center">13 (31)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>One diseased vessel</td>
              <td align="center">10 (24)</td>
              <td align="center">20 (48)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">0.039</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Two diseased vessels</td>
              <td align="center">14 (33)</td>
              <td align="center">6 (14)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">0.071</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Three diseased vessels</td>
              <td align="center">8 (19)</td>
              <td align="center">3 (7)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">0.194</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Multivessel (&gt; 3 diseased vessels)</td>
              <td align="center">9 (22)</td>
              <td align="center">0</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">0.002</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Location of stenosis (&gt; 50%), n (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td align="center">
                <bold>Before treatment (n = 41)</bold>
              </td>
              <td align="center">
                <bold>After treatment (n = 29)</bold>
              </td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">&#160;</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Anterior descending artery</td>
              <td align="center">32 (78)</td>
              <td align="center">8 (28)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Left circumflex artery</td>
              <td align="center">26 (63)</td>
              <td align="center">13 (45)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">0.147</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Right coronary artery</td>
              <td align="center">24 (58)</td>
              <td align="center">10 (34)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">0.056</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Diagonal arteries</td>
              <td align="center">8 (19)</td>
              <td align="center">6 (21)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">1.000</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Marginal arteries</td>
              <td align="center">4 (10)</td>
              <td align="center">1 (3)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">0.394</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="5">
                <bold>CAD characteristics, n (%)</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="5">
                <bold>With myocardial infarction</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Treated only with medication</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">1 (2)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Treated with angioplasty</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">25 (60)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Treated with CABG</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">6 (14)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="5">
                <bold>Without myocardial infarction</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Treated only with medication</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">2 (5)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Treated with angioplasty</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">3 (7)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Treated with CABG</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">5 (12)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="5">
                <bold>Risk factors, n (%)</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>History of smoking</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">15 (36)</td>
              <td align="center">3 (7)</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Diabetes</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">0</td>
              <td align="center">0</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Arterial hypertension</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">38 (90)</td>
              <td align="center">0</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Dyslipidemia</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">39 (93)</td>
              <td align="center">0</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="5">
                <bold>Medications, n (%)</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Beta-blocker</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">37 (88)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>ACE inhibitor</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">24 (57)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Diuretic</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">12 (29)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Lipid-lowering</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">39 (93)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Antiplatelet/ anticoagulant</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">42 (100)</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn>
            <p>Data are presented as mean &#177; SD or absolute values (%).</p>
            <p>CAD-G: coronary arterial disease group; CG: control group, n: number of individuals; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; (-): not applicable; ACE: angiotensin converting enzyme. Unpaired Student&#8217;s t-test and Fisher&#8217;s exact test.  </p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <p><xref ref-type="table" rid="t02">Table 2</xref> shows the comparison between groups in relation to peak variables obtained during the maximal standard exercise test that preceded CPX. CAD-G had significantly lower values for HR (p &lt; 0.001) and systolic BP (p = 0.012) compared with CG. In addition, CAD-G had significantly higher values for diastolic BP (p = 0.016) and symptoms of dyspnea and leg fatigue (p &lt; 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively) compared with CG. Furthermore, the occurrence of angina (reported by the patients) was present in only 5% of CAD-G (n = 2), whereas it was not present in any subjects in CG. ECG recordings revealed that 7% of CAD-G (n = 3) presented ST segment depression &lt; 2 mm and 5% (n = 2) presented ST segment depression &#8805; 2 mm; there was no abnormality in ECG in CG (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t02">Table 2</xref>).</p>
      <table-wrap id="t02">
        <label>Table 2</label>
        <caption>
          <title>Peak variables obtained during maximal standard exercise testing for clinical evaluation in CAD-G and CG</title>
        </caption>
        <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th>&#160;</th>
              <th align="center">
                <bold>CAD-G (n = 42)</bold>
              </th>
              <th align="center">
                <bold>CG (n = 45)</bold>
              </th>
              <th colspan="2" align="center">
                <bold>p value</bold>
              </th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>HR, bpm</td>
              <td align="center">144.9 &#177; 20.0</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">169.9 &#177; 19.1</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Systolic BP, mmHg</td>
              <td align="center">175.7 &#177; 26.5</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">189.5 &#177; 22.3</td>
              <td align="center">0.012</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Diastolic BP, mmHg</td>
              <td align="center">91.3 &#177; 11.8</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">85.0 &#177; 11.2</td>
              <td align="center">0.016</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Symptoms of dyspnea (0&#8211;10)</td>
              <td align="center">7.0 [2 - 10]</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">4.0 [2 - 6]</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Leg fatigue (0&#8211;10)</td>
              <td align="center">6.0 [0 - 10]</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">4.5 [2 - 5]</td>
              <td align="center">0.008</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Angina, n (%)</td>
              <td align="center">2 (5)</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">0</td>
              <td align="center">0.230</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>ST segment depression &lt; 2 mm, n (%)</td>
              <td align="center">3 (7)</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">0</td>
              <td align="center">0.108</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>ST segment depression &#8805; 2 mm, n (%)</td>
              <td align="center">2 (5)</td>
              <td colspan="2" align="center">0</td>
              <td align="center">0.230</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn>
            <p>Data are presented as mean &#177; SD, median [minimum - maximum] or absolute values (%).</p>
            <p>CAD-G: coronary artery disease group; CG: control group; n: number of subjects; HR: heart rate; BP: blood pressure. Unpaired Student&#8217;s t-test and Fisher&#8217;s exact test.  </p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>During CPX, the maximum walking velocity obtained was significantly lower in CAD-G (6.2 &#177; 0.4 km/h, range: 5&#8211;7 km/h) than CG (7.1 &#177; 0.7 km/h, range: 6&#8211;8 km/h in CG) (p &lt; 0.001); however, there were no significant differences with respect to maximum grade obtained between groups: 12.8 &#177; 4.9 % (range: 3.5&#8211;22 %) in CAD-G and 11.6 &#177; 5.6% (range: 1.5&#8211;21 %) in CG (p = 0.311). Key CPX variables and aerobic functional classification according to American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref> for CAD-G and CG are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t03">Table 3</xref>. There were no significant differences in HR and BP between groups during rest. During peak effort, CAD-G had significantly lower values for VO<sub>2</sub>(p &lt; 0.001), HR (p &lt; 0.001), % of predicted maximum HR (p &lt; 0.001), delta of HR (p &lt; 0.001), systolic BP (p &lt; 0.001), RPP (p &lt; 0.001), oxygen pulse (p = 0.008), OUES (p &lt; 0.001), CP (p &lt; 0.001), and VP (p &lt; 0.001) compared with CG. In addition, during peak effort, CAD-G had significantly higher values for diastolic BP (p &lt; 0.001), the VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope (p = 0.004), symptoms of dyspnea and leg fatigue (p = 0.008 and p &lt; 0.001, respectively) compared with CG. Furthermore, angina (reported by the patients) occurred only in 2% of CAD-G (n = 1) and was not present in any subjects in CG. There were no ECG abnormalities in either group (CAD-G and CG) during CPX (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t03">Table 3</xref>). With regard to the aerobic functional classification according to AHA guidelines<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="t03">Table 3</xref> shows that the majority of patients of CAD-G had a weak aerobic classification (53%), while in CG slightly more than half of subjects had a regular level of aerobic classification (53%).</p>
      <table-wrap id="t03">
        <label>Table 3</label>
        <caption>
          <title>Variables obtained during cardiopulmonary exercise testing and aerobic functional classification according to AHA guidelines in CAD-G and CG</title>
        </caption>
        <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th>&#160;</th>
              <th align="center">
                <bold>CAD-G (n = 42)</bold>
              </th>
              <th align="center">
                <bold>CG (n = 45)</bold>
              </th>
              <th align="center">
                <bold>p value</bold>
              </th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="4">
                <bold>Rest</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>HR, bpm</td>
              <td align="center">65.9 &#177; 11</td>
              <td align="center">69.7 &#177; 11</td>
              <td align="center">0.110</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Systolic BP, mmHg</td>
              <td align="center">120.7 &#177; 10.7</td>
              <td align="center">117.4 &#177; 18.7</td>
              <td align="center">0.298</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Diastolic BP, mmHg</td>
              <td align="center">82.6 &#177; 7.6</td>
              <td align="center">79.7 &#177; 9.6</td>
              <td align="center">0.103</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="4">
                <bold>Peak</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>VO<sub>2</sub>, ml.kg<sup>&#8722;1</sup>min<sup>&#8722;1</sup></td>
              <td align="center">22.9 &#177; 4.8</td>
              <td align="center">32.7 &#177; 6.6</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>RER</td>
              <td align="center">1.11 &#177; 0.07</td>
              <td align="center">1.12 &#177; 0.08</td>
              <td align="center">0.738</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>HR, bpm</td>
              <td align="center">135.4 &#177; 22.2</td>
              <td align="center">165.0 &#177; 18.7</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>% of predicted maximum HR</td>
              <td align="center">81.8 &#177; 13.4</td>
              <td align="center">97.7 &#177; 9.9</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Delta of HR, bpm</td>
              <td align="center">52.7 &#177; 23.1</td>
              <td align="center">85.2 &#177; 20.7</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Systolic BP, mmHg</td>
              <td align="center">169.8 &#177; 24.6</td>
              <td align="center">186.1 &#177; 19.8</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Diastolic BP, mmHg</td>
              <td align="center">88.3 &#177; 9.9</td>
              <td align="center">80.1 &#177; 10.7</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>RPP, mmHg.bpm</td>
              <td align="center">23052 &#177; 4889</td>
              <td align="center">30713 &#177; 4800</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Oxygen pulse, mL/beat</td>
              <td align="center">13.5 &#177; 2.9</td>
              <td align="center">15.4 &#177; 3.8</td>
              <td align="center">0.008</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope</td>
              <td align="center">31.6 &#177; 5.2</td>
              <td align="center">28.6 &#177; 4.4</td>
              <td align="center">0.004</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>OUES</td>
              <td align="center">1963 &#177; 449.7</td>
              <td align="center">2555 &#177; 552</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>CP, mmHg.ml.kg<sup>&#8722;1</sup>min<sup>&#8722;1</sup></td>
              <td align="center">3902 &#177; 1016</td>
              <td align="center">6099 &#177; 1403</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>VP, mmHg</td>
              <td align="center">5.5 &#177; 1.2</td>
              <td align="center">6.6 &#177; 1.3</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Symptoms of dyspnea (0&#8211;10)</td>
              <td align="center">6.0 [4 - 8]</td>
              <td align="center">4.5 [2 - 5]</td>
              <td align="center">0.008</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Leg fatigue (0&#8211;10)</td>
              <td align="center">7.0 [4 - 9]</td>
              <td align="center">4.5 [2 - 6]</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Angina, n (%)</td>
              <td align="center">1 (2)</td>
              <td align="center">0</td>
              <td align="center">0.230</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>ST segment depression &lt; 2 mm, n (%)</td>
              <td align="center">0</td>
              <td align="center">0</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>ST segment depression &#8805; 2 mm, n (%)</td>
              <td align="center">0</td>
              <td align="center">0</td>
              <td align="center">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="4">
                <bold>Aerobic functional classification, n (%)</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Very weak</td>
              <td align="center">6 (14)</td>
              <td align="center">1 (2)</td>
              <td align="center">0.052</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Weak</td>
              <td align="center">22 (53)</td>
              <td align="center">3 (7)</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Regular</td>
              <td align="center">14 (33)</td>
              <td align="center">24 (53)</td>
              <td align="center">0.083</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Good</td>
              <td align="center">0</td>
              <td align="center">15 (33)</td>
              <td align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Excellent</td>
              <td align="center">0</td>
              <td align="center">2 (5)</td>
              <td align="center">0.494</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn>
            <p>Data are presented as mean &#177; SD, median [minimum - maximum] or absolute values (%).</p>
            <p>CPX: cardiopulmonary exercise testing; AHA: American Heart Association; CAD-G: coronary artery disease group; CG: control group; n: number of subjects; HR: heart rate; BP: blood pressure; VO<sub>2</sub>: oxygen uptake; RER: respiratory exchange ratio; % of predicted maximum HR: % of 220 minus age; Delta of HR peak HR minus HR at rest; RPP: rate-pressure product; VE/VCO2 slope: linear relation between minute ventilation, and carbon dioxide production; OUES: linear relationship between oxygen uptake and minute ventilation, CP: circulatory power; VP: ventilatory power. Unpaired Student&#8217;s t-test and Fisher&#8217;s exact test.  </p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>Stepwise regression analysis was performed to determine the possible influence of group, medications, risk factors (hypertension and dyslipidemia), and number of vessels with stenosis after treatment on CPX variables of interest. We found that none of the variables were affected by risk factors. However, the following influences were determined: 1) peak VO<sub>2</sub> was influenced by group and medications (interaction effects: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.46, &#946; of group = 0.95 and &#946; of medications = &#8722;0.35, p &lt; 0.001); 2) peak systolic BP was influenced only by medications (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.11, &#946; = 0.34, p &lt; 0.001); 3) the VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope was influenced only by group (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.08, &#946; = 0.30, p &lt; 0.001); 4) CP was influenced only by group (R<sup>2</sup>= 0.44, &#946; = 0.67, p &lt; 0.001); and 5) VP was influenced by group and number of vessels with stenosis after treatment (interaction effects: R<sup>2</sup>= 0.46, &#946; of group = 0.62 and &#946; of number of vessels with stenosis after treatment = &#8722;0.30, p &lt; 0.001).</p>
      <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="f01">Figure 1</xref> illustrates a significant correlation between both CP and VP and peak VO<sub>2</sub>, considering the subjects by aerobic functional classification according to AHA guidelines<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>. For better visualization of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f01">Figure 1</xref>, only those with a weak (n = 22) and regular level of classification (n = 14) in CAD-G and only those with regular (n = 24) and good level of classification (n = 15) in CG were included in the statistical analysis and presented in this figure. With respect to CP, there was a strong positive correlation with peak VO<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f01">Figure 1A</xref>, r = 0.91, p &lt; 0.001), while VP showed a moderate positive correlation with peak VO<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f01">Figure 1B</xref>, r = 0.43, p &lt; 0.001). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f02">Figure 2</xref> illustrates the significant correlations between CP and VP and other CPX indices (OUES, RPP, and oxygen pulse), considering the entire study cohort. CP exhibited a strong positive correlation with OUES (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f02">Figure 2A</xref>, r = 0.75, p &lt; 0.001) and peak RPP (Figure 2C, r = 0.74, p &lt; 0.001) and moderate positive correlation with peak oxygen pulse (Figure 2E, r = 0.59, p &lt; 0.001); with regard to VP there was a moderate positive correlation with OUES (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f02">Figure 2B</xref>, r = 0.55, p &lt; 0.001), peak RPP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f02">Figure 2D</xref>, r = 0.58, p &lt; 0.001) and peak oxygen pulse (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f02">Figure 2F</xref>, r = 0.55, p &lt; 0.001).</p>
      <fig id="f01">
        <label>Figure 1</label>
        <caption>
          <title>Circulatory power (CP) and ventilatory power (VP) correlated with oxygen uptake (VO2) by aerobic functional classification according to American Heart Association guidelines. Legend: (&#959;) coronary artery disease group (CAD-G) with weak functional classification, (&#8226;) CAD-G with regular functional classification, (&#916;) control group (CG) with regular functional classification and (&#9650;) CG with good functional classification. Pearson correlation analysis.</title>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="1678-4170-abc-104-06-0476-50035-gf01.jpg"/></fig>
      <fig id="f02">
        <label>Figure 2</label>
        <caption>
          <title>Circulatory power (CP) and ventilatory power (VP) correlated with OUES, RPP and oxygen pulse. Legend: (&#959;) coronary arterial disease group (CAD-G), (&#8226;) control group (CG), OUES linear relationship between oxygen uptake and minute ventilation, RPP rate-pressure product. Pearson correlation analysis.</title>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="1678-4170-abc-104-06-0476-50035-gf02.jpg"/></fig>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="discussion">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>The main findings from this study were: 1) CAD patients without heart failure under current standard pharmacologic regimens, angioplasty, or surgical management had lower CP and VP values compared with CG; 2) the indices CP and VP correlated positively with VO<sub>2</sub> according to aerobic functional classification as per AHA guidelines<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>; and 3) the response of CPX and the metabolic, ventilator, and cardiovascular variables demonstrated lower functional capacity and poorer exercise response in subjects with CAD.</p>
      <p>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to introduce CP and VP indices in the functional evaluation of subjects with CAD without heart failure compared with apparently healthy controls. Thus, our findings have a potential clinical relevance given that these indices may be used to assess the functional significance of the disease process. The potential advantage of CP and VP indices is that both are simple and noninvasive and synergistically combine singular indices related to cardiopulmonary integrity and health.</p>
      <sec>
        <title>Sample characteristics</title>
        <p>As listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t01">Table 1</xref>, the groups did not differ in terms of age; this is an important consideration as it is known that aging affects peak VO<sub>2  </sub><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>. In addition, we did not include obese individuals because they present with abnormal exercise responses unique to body habitus, which could have confounded our results<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>. We included patients with controlled systemic arterial hypertension and controlled dyslipidemia in CAD-G; however, we observed (using stepwise regression analysis) that these factors did not influence the CPX response.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
        <title>Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX)</title>
        <p>CP and VP were lower in CAD-G than in CG; the same observation was applicable to the following peak variables obtained during CPX: VO<sub>2</sub>, HR, % of predicted maximum HR, delta of HR, systolic BP, RPP, oxygen pulse, and OUES. Moreover, higher values of peak diastolic BP and the VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope were found in CAD-G. Pharmacologic management, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and particularly beta-blockers, may contribute to the exercise response because CAD-G presented with lower values of peak systolic BP, peak HR, and peak VO<sub>2</sub> in relation to CG during CPX. In addition, during the maximal standard exercise test performed with suspended pharmacological therapy, CAD-G presented with a higher peak HR (approximately 7%) than CPX, in which the subjects were undergoing pharmacological therapy. Although these medications may have influenced our results, they are considered standard of care therapy for these patients<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>, and beta-blocker withdrawal can increase the risk of heart events<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>. Because VO<sub>2</sub> is present in the formula of CP and BP is present in the formula of CP and VP, it is important to consider that medications influenced peak VO<sub>2</sub> and peak systolic BP (as indicated by stepwise regression analysis), but did not influence CP and VP. Furthermore, the group influenced peak VO<sub>2</sub>, the VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope, CP, and VP, while the number of vessels with stenosis after treatment influenced the VP. Thus, we believe that the lower values of CP and VP observed during CPX in CAD-G are related to standard medications, level of aerobic capacity and characteristics of CAD and that the reduction of VP in this population may also be related to number of vessels with stenosis after treatment.</p>
        <p>One way to quantify exercise performance is by measuring peak VO<sub>2</sub>. In the present study the lower values of this variable observed in CAD-G reinforce the role of CAD in a worse CPX response<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>, which was also directly related to the ventilatory inefficiency observed in this group (higher VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope and lower OUES). High values of the VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>slope are often related to a worsening pulmonary hemodynamic profile and increased chemoreceptor and ergoreceptor activation, as well as decreased autonomic modulation and cardiovascular function<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B07">7</xref>. Lower OUES values indicate that the extraction and utilization of oxygen is impaired because this variable is strongly correlated to VO<sub>2</sub><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B03">3</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B04">4</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>. Furthermore, we observed in the present study that RPP and oxygen pulse were lower in CAD-G at peak CPX. RPP has been used as a relevant parameter in evaluating ventricular function, and high values at peak exercise are most likely related to good ventricular function and no ischemia<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>. In addition, the oxygen pulse indicates the amount of oxygen consumed per heart beat, which reflects the efficiency of the cardiovascular system and may provide prognostic information in patients with CAD<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>.</p>
        <p>Another interesting and novel finding of this study was that subjects with a lower peak VO<sub>2</sub> presented with lower indices CP and VP that correlated with the aerobic functional classification according to AHA guidelines<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>. A recent prospective study<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref> that evaluated the associations between exercise test parameters and all-cause mortality in patients without previous cardiovascular disease showed that poor exercise tolerance (determined by the observed duration of exercise in relation to the predicted duration) is associated with greater mortality risk. In our cross-sectional comparative study we observed that CP and VP positively correlated (strong and moderate correlation, respectively) with aerobic functional classification evaluated by peak VO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
        <p>Cohen-Solal et al. (2002)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref> longitudinally evaluated (mean follow-up 25 &#177; 10 months) 175 heart failure patients who were subjected to an incremental CPX. Their study showed that CP was predictive of prognosis and that the combination of VO<sub>2</sub> and systolic BP (through the CP index) strengthens the prognostic value of CPX, particularly in subjects with low peak VO<sub>2</sub> and peak BP. Similar to the previous report, Forman et al. (2012)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref> evaluated the prognostic use of VP in a longitudinal study (mean follow-up 4 years) with 875 heart failure patients submitted to CPX. The authors showed that VP was independently predictive of cardiac events compared with standard CPX indices (i.e., peak VO<sub>2</sub> and the VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope); furthermore, in a multivariate analysis, combined CP and VP provided even better prognostic discrimination. Although traditional variables obtained by CPX, such as VO<sub>2</sub>, systolic BP, and the VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>slope, reflect the aerobic capacity, hemodynamic control and carbon dioxide production eficiency efficiency, respectively, CP and VP are indices that combine these variables. VP, as an index that combines systemic hemodynamics with carbon dioxide production efficiency during exercise, and CP as an index that combines central and peripheral components of cardiac stroke work, appear to both portend important information regarding disease severity and prognosis<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>.</p>
        <p>Recently, Borghi-Silva el al (2014)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref> assessed the relationship between VP and key measures obtained using Doppler echocardiography in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction; their results showed that lower values of VP translate into a very unfavorable phenotype characterized by a lower peak VO<sub>2</sub> and cardiac output response. The current study is a cross-sectional analysis with the goal of characterizing these indices in a CAD cohort under current standard pharmacologic regimens, angioplasty, or surgical management without heart failure. Our findings demonstrate that CP and VP are abnormal in CAD patients compared with healthy controls, and are related not only to standard medication but also to the level of aerobic capacity and characteristics of CAD; moreover, VP is related to the number of vessels with stenosis after treatment. Future work is needed to determine the prognostic utility of CP and VP in patients with CAD and establish whether both indices perform similarly to what has been found in patients with heart failure<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
        <title>Study limitations</title>
        <p>This investigation is characterized by an initial exploration of CP and VP indices in males with CAD; however, it has some limitations. First, although the literature<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref> indicates that CP and VP appear to be important prognostic markers in patients with heart failure, the cross-sectional nature and relatively small sample size of the current study did not allow us to expand upon prognostic utility. Therefore, additional prospective evaluations in this population are needed to determine the usefulness of these indices as prognostic markers. In relation to cardiac function, the CAD group was characterized only by left ventricular ejection fraction because 50% of patients were evaluated by ventriculography and 50% by echocardiogram. Women were not included in this study because the selected age could include both women with regular menstrual cycle (with and without use of contraceptives) and women in the postmenopausal stage (with and without use of hormone replacement therapy) and these differences could influence our results<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>. Although the pharmacologic management of systemic arterial hypertension by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and particularly beta-blockers may have influenced the behavior of CP and VP (as well as of other indices obtained from CPX), medication cessation is not possible because it is mandatory therapy for some patients. Future studies including a control group of systemic arterial hypertension patients without CAD (with similar pharmacologic management to our study) could eliminate the possible influence of medications on studied variables.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>The CP and VP indices were lower in men with CAD, without heart failure, and under current standard pharmacologic regimens, angioplasty, or surgical management than healthy controls, demonstrating a poorer cardiopulmonary function in this population. Our results suggest that both CP and VP may hold value as screening tools in assessing the functional significance of disease, exercise tolerance, and may consequently assist in the prescription of physical training in this population when used individually or complementarily to other indices currently attained by CPX. In fact, a multivariate approach including indices related to both central and peripheral function would likely provide a more comprehensive evaluation of exertional physiology. Future investigations are needed to evaluate if lower CP and VP values are due only to the CAD or to the use of standard pharmacologic regimens, as well as to verify the prognostic value of these indices in this patient population.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <fn-group>
      <fn fn-type="supported-by">
        <p>
          <bold>Sources of Funding</bold>
        </p>
        <p>This study was funded by Funda&#231;&#227;o de Amparo &#224; Pesquisa do Estado de S&#227;o Paulo (FAPESP), S&#227;o Paulo/SP/Brasil (processo: 2010/52070-4); Coordena&#231;&#227;o de Aperfei&#231;oamento de Pessoal de N&#237;vel Superior (CAPES), Bras&#237;lia/DF/Brasil; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient&#237;fico e Tenol&#243;gico (CNPq), Bras&#237;lia/DF/Brasil (processo: 483945/2007-2).</p>
      </fn>
      <fn fn-type="other">
        <p>
          <bold>Study Association</bold>
        </p>
        <p>This article is part of the thesis of Doctoral submitted by Viviane Castello Sim&#245;es, from Universidade Federal de S&#227;o Carlos.</p>
      </fn>
    </fn-group>
    <sec>
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>The authors would like to thank the patients for their effort and enthusiastic cooperation throughout the study and the physicians S&#233;rgio Luiz Berti and Jo&#227;o Or&#225;vio de Freitas Jr. for support with the hemodynamic section patients.</p>
    </sec>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B01">
        <label>1</label>
        <mixed-citation>1. American Thoracic Society; American College of Chest Physicians. ATS/ACCP. Statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167(2):211-77.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <collab>American Thoracic Society</collab>
            <collab>American College of Chest Physicians</collab>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>ATS/ ACCP. Statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing</article-title>
          <source>Am J Respir Crit Care Med</source>
          <year>2003</year>
          <volume>167</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>211</fpage>
          <lpage>277</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B02">
        <label>2</label>
        <mixed-citation>2. Sun XG, Hansen EJ, Garatachea N, Storer TW, Wasserman K. Ventilatory efficiency during exercise in healthy subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(11):1443-8.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Sun</surname>
              <given-names>XG</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hansen</surname>
              <given-names>EJ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Garatachea</surname>
              <given-names>N</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Storer</surname>
              <given-names>TW</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Wasserman</surname>
              <given-names>K</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Ventilatory efficiency during exercise in healthy subjects</article-title>
          <source>Am J Respir Crit Care Med</source>
          <year>2002</year>
          <volume>166</volume>
          <issue>11</issue>
          <fpage>1443</fpage>
          <lpage>1448</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B03">
        <label>3</label>
        <mixed-citation>3. Baba R, Nagashima M, Masahiko G, Nagano Y, Yokota M, Tauchi N, et al. Oxygen uptake efficiency slope: a new index of cardiorespiratory functional reserve derived from the relation between oxygen uptake and minute ventilation during incremental exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28(6):1567-72.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Baba</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Nagashima</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Masahiko</surname>
              <given-names>G</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Nagano</surname>
              <given-names>Y</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Yokota</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Tauchi</surname>
              <given-names>N</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Oxygen uptake efficiency slope: a new index of cardiorespiratory functional reserve derived from the relation between oxygen uptake and minute ventilation during incremental exercise</article-title>
          <source>J Am Coll Cardiol</source>
          <year>1996</year>
          <volume>28</volume>
          <issue>6</issue>
          <fpage>1567</fpage>
          <lpage>1572</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B04">
        <label>4</label>
        <mixed-citation>4. Baba R, Kubo N, Morotome Y, Iwagaki S. Reproducibility of the oxygen uptake efficiency slope in normal healthy subjects. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1999;39(3):202-6.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Baba</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kubo</surname>
              <given-names>N</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Morotome</surname>
              <given-names>Y</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Iwagaki</surname>
              <given-names>S</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Reproducibility of the oxygen uptake efficiency slope in normal healthy subjects</article-title>
          <source>J Sports Med Phys Fitness</source>
          <year>1999</year>
          <volume>39</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>202</fpage>
          <lpage>206</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B05">
        <label>5</label>
        <mixed-citation>5. Arena R, Humphrey R, Peberdy MA. Prognostic ability of VE/VCO2 slope calculations using different exercise test time intervals in subjects with heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2003;10(6):463-8.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Arena</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Humphrey</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Peberdy</surname>
              <given-names>MA</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Prognostic ability of VE/VCO2 slope calculations using different exercise test time intervals in subjects with heart failure</article-title>
          <source>Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil</source>
          <year>2003</year>
          <volume>10</volume>
          <issue>6</issue>
          <fpage>463</fpage>
          <lpage>468</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B06">
        <label>6</label>
        <mixed-citation>6. Van Laethem C, Bartunek J, Goethals M, Nellens P, Andries E, Vanderheyden M. Oxygen uptake efficiency slope, a new submaximal parameter in evaluating exercise capacity in chronic heart failure patients. Am Heart J. 2005;149(1):175-80.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Van Laethem</surname>
              <given-names>C</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bartunek</surname>
              <given-names>J</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Goethals</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Nellens</surname>
              <given-names>P</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Andries</surname>
              <given-names>E</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Vanderheyden</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Oxygen uptake efficiency slope, a new submaximal parameter in evaluating exercise capacity in chronic heart failure patients</article-title>
          <source>Am Heart J</source>
          <year>2005</year>
          <volume>149</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>175</fpage>
          <lpage>180</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B07">
        <label>7</label>
        <mixed-citation>7. Arena R, Myers J, Hsu L, Peberdy MA, Pinkstaff S, Bensimhon D, et al. The minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope is prognostically superior to the oxygen uptake efficiency slope. J Card Fail. 2007;13(6):462-9.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Arena</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Myers</surname>
              <given-names>J</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hsu</surname>
              <given-names>L</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Peberdy</surname>
              <given-names>MA</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Pinkstaff</surname>
              <given-names>S</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bensimhon</surname>
              <given-names>D</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>The minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope is prognostically superior to the oxygen uptake efficiency slope</article-title>
          <source>J Card Fail</source>
          <year>2007</year>
          <volume>13</volume>
          <issue>6</issue>
          <fpage>462</fpage>
          <lpage>469</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B08">
        <label>8</label>
        <mixed-citation>8. Arena R, Myers J, Guazzi M. The clinical and research applications of aerobic capacity and ventilatory efficiency in heart failure: an evidence-based review. Heart Fail Rev. 2008;13(2):245-69.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Arena</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Myers</surname>
              <given-names>J</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Guazzi</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>The clinical and research applications of aerobic capacity and ventilatory efficiency in heart failure: an evidence-based review</article-title>
          <source>Heart Fail Rev</source>
          <year>2008</year>
          <volume>13</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>245</fpage>
          <lpage>269</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B09">
        <label>9</label>
        <mixed-citation>9. Tsurugaya H, Adachi H, Kurabayashi M, Ohshima S, Taniguchi K. Prognostic impact of ventilatory efficiency in heart disease patients with preserved exercise tolerance. Circ J. 2006; 70(10):1332-6.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Tsurugaya</surname>
              <given-names>H</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Adachi</surname>
              <given-names>H</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kurabayashi</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ohshima</surname>
              <given-names>S</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Taniguchi</surname>
              <given-names>K</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Prognostic impact of ventilatory efficiency in heart disease patients with preserved exercise tolerance</article-title>
          <source>Circ J</source>
          <year>2006</year>
          <volume>70</volume>
          <issue>10</issue>
          <fpage>1332</fpage>
          <lpage>1336</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10</label>
        <mixed-citation>10. Van de Veire NR, Van Laethem C, Philipp&#233; J, De Winter O, De Backer G, Vanderheyden M, et al. VE/VCO2 slope and oxygen uptake efficiency slope in patients with coronary artery disease and intermediate peak VO2. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006;13(6):916-23.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Van de Veire</surname>
              <given-names>NR</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Van Laethem</surname>
              <given-names>C</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Philipp&#233;</surname>
              <given-names>J</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>De Winter</surname>
              <given-names>O</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>De Backer</surname>
              <given-names>G</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Vanderheyden</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>VE/VCO2 slope and oxygen uptake efficiency slope in patients with coronary artery disease and intermediate peak VO2</article-title>
          <source>Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil</source>
          <year>2006</year>
          <volume>13</volume>
          <issue>6</issue>
          <fpage>916</fpage>
          <lpage>923</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11</label>
        <mixed-citation>11. Baba R, Tsuyuki K, Yano H, Ninomiya K, Ebine K. Robustness of the oxygen uptake efficiency slope to exercise intensity in patients with coronary artery disease. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2010;72(1-2):83-9.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Baba</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Tsuyuki</surname>
              <given-names>K</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Yano</surname>
              <given-names>H</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ninomiya</surname>
              <given-names>K</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ebine</surname>
              <given-names>K</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Robustness of the oxygen uptake efficiency slope to exercise intensity in patients with coronary artery disease</article-title>
          <source>Nagoya J Med Sci</source>
          <year>2010</year>
          <volume>72</volume>
          <issue>1-2</issue>
          <fpage>83</fpage>
          <lpage>89</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12</label>
        <mixed-citation>12. Cohen-Solal A, Tabet JY, Logeart D, Bourgoin P, Tokmakova M, Dahan M. A noninvasively determined surrogate of cardiac power ('circulatory power') at peak exercise is a powerful prognostic factor in chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2002;23(10):806-14.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Cohen-Solal</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Tabet</surname>
              <given-names>JY</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Logeart</surname>
              <given-names>D</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bourgoin</surname>
              <given-names>P</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Tokmakova</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Dahan</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>A noninvasively determined surrogate of cardiac power ('circulatory power') at peak exercise is a powerful prognostic factor in chronic heart failure</article-title>
          <source>Eur Heart J</source>
          <year>2002</year>
          <volume>23</volume>
          <issue>10</issue>
          <fpage>806</fpage>
          <lpage>814</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13</label>
        <mixed-citation>13. Giardini A, Specchia S, Berton E, Sangiorgi D, Coutsoumbas G, Gargiulo G, et al. Strong and independent prognostic value of peak circulatory power in adults with congenital heart disease. Am Heart J. 2007;154(3):441-7.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Giardini</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Specchia</surname>
              <given-names>S</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Berton</surname>
              <given-names>E</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Sangiorgi</surname>
              <given-names>D</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Coutsoumbas</surname>
              <given-names>G</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gargiulo</surname>
              <given-names>G</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Strong and independent prognostic value of peak circulatory power in adults with congenital heart disease</article-title>
          <source>Am Heart J</source>
          <year>2007</year>
          <volume>154</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>441</fpage>
          <lpage>447</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14</label>
        <mixed-citation>14. Jaussaud J, Blanc P, Derval N, Bordachar P, Courregelongue M, Roudaut R, et al. Ventilatory response and peak circulatory power: new functional markers of response after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;103(3):184-91.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Jaussaud</surname>
              <given-names>J</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Blanc</surname>
              <given-names>P</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Derval</surname>
              <given-names>N</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bordachar</surname>
              <given-names>P</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Courregelongue</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Roudaut</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Ventilatory response and peak circulatory power: new functional markers of response after cardiac resynchronization therapy</article-title>
          <source>Arch Cardiovasc Dis</source>
          <year>2010</year>
          <volume>103</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>184</fpage>
          <lpage>191</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15</label>
        <mixed-citation>15. Madan N, Beachler L, Konstantinopoulos P, Worley S, Sun Z, Latson LA. Peak circulatory power as an indicator of clinical status in children after Fontan procedure. Pediatr Cardiol. 2010; 31(8):1203-8.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Madan</surname>
              <given-names>N</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Beachler</surname>
              <given-names>L</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Konstantinopoulos</surname>
              <given-names>P</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Worley</surname>
              <given-names>S</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Sun</surname>
              <given-names>Z</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Latson</surname>
              <given-names>LA</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Peak circulatory power as an indicator of clinical status in children after Fontan procedure</article-title>
          <source>Pediatr Cardiol</source>
          <year>2010</year>
          <volume>31</volume>
          <issue>8</issue>
          <fpage>1203</fpage>
          <lpage>1208</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16</label>
        <mixed-citation>16. Forman DE, Guazzi M, Myers J, Chase P, Bensimhon D, Cahalin LP, et al. A novel index that enhances prognostic assessment of patients with heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5(5):621-6.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Forman</surname>
              <given-names>DE</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Guazzi</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Myers</surname>
              <given-names>J</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Chase</surname>
              <given-names>P</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bensimhon</surname>
              <given-names>D</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Cahalin</surname>
              <given-names>LP</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>A novel index that enhances prognostic assessment of patients with heart failure</article-title>
          <source>Circ Heart Fail</source>
          <year>2012</year>
          <volume>5</volume>
          <issue>5</issue>
          <fpage>621</fpage>
          <lpage>626</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17</label>
        <mixed-citation>17. Bruce RA, Kusumi F, Hosmer D. Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional aerobic impairment in cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J.1973;85(4):546-62.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Bruce</surname>
              <given-names>RA</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kusumi</surname>
              <given-names>F</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hosmer</surname>
              <given-names>D</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional aerobic impairment in cardiovascular disease</article-title>
          <source>Am Heart J</source>
          <year>1973</year>
          <volume>85</volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <fpage>546</fpage>
          <lpage>562</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18</label>
        <mixed-citation>18. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Borg</surname>
              <given-names>GA</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion</article-title>
          <source>Med Sci Sports Exerc</source>
          <year>1982</year>
          <volume>14</volume>
          <issue>5</issue>
          <fpage>377</fpage>
          <lpage>381</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19</label>
        <mixed-citation>19. Neves LMT, Karsten M, Neves VR, Beltrame T, Borghi-Silva A, Catai AM. Relationship between inspiratory muscle capacity and peak exercise. Heart Lung. 2012;41(2):137-45.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Neves</surname>
              <given-names>LMT</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Karsten</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Neves</surname>
              <given-names>VR</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Beltrame</surname>
              <given-names>T</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Borghi-Silva</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Catai</surname>
              <given-names>AM</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Relationship between inspiratory muscle capacity and peak exercise</article-title>
          <source>Heart Lung</source>
          <year>2012</year>
          <volume>41</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>137</fpage>
          <lpage>145</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20</label>
        <mixed-citation>20. Neves LMT, Karsten M, Neves VR, Beltrame T, Borghi-Silva A, Catai AM. Respiratory muscle endurance is limited by lower ventilatory efficiency in post-myocardial infarction patients. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014;18(1):1-8.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Neves</surname>
              <given-names>LMT</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Karsten</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Neves</surname>
              <given-names>VR</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Beltrame</surname>
              <given-names>T</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Borghi-Silva</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Catai</surname>
              <given-names>AM</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Respiratory muscle endurance is limited by lower ventilatory efficiency in post-myocardial infarction patients</article-title>
          <source>Braz J Phys Ther</source>
          <year>2014</year>
          <volume>18</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>8</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21</label>
        <mixed-citation>21. Mezzani A, Agostoni P, Cohen-Solal A, Corr&#224; U, Jegier A, Kouidi E, et al. Standards for the use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the functional evaluation of cardiac patients: a report from the Exercise Physiology Section of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009;16(3):249-67.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Mezzani</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Agostoni</surname>
              <given-names>P</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Cohen-Solal</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Corr&#224;</surname>
              <given-names>U</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Jegier</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kouidi</surname>
              <given-names>E</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Standards for the use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the functional evaluation of cardiac patients: a report from the Exercise Physiology Section of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation</article-title>
          <source>Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil</source>
          <year>2009</year>
          <volume>16</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>249</fpage>
          <lpage>267</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22</label>
        <mixed-citation>22. Balady GJ, Arena R, Sietsema K, Myers J, Coke L, Fletcher GF, et al. Clinician's Guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;122(2):191-225.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Balady</surname>
              <given-names>GJ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Arena</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Sietsema</surname>
              <given-names>K</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Myers</surname>
              <given-names>J</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Coke</surname>
              <given-names>L</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Fletcher</surname>
              <given-names>GF</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Clinician's Guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association</article-title>
          <source>Circulation</source>
          <year>2010</year>
          <volume>122</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>191</fpage>
          <lpage>225</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23</label>
        <mixed-citation>23. Higa MN, Silva E, Neves VF, Catai AM, Gallo L Jr, Silva de S&#225; MF. Comparison of anaerobic threshold determined by visual and mathematical methods in healthy women. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2007;40(4):501-8.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Higa</surname>
              <given-names>MN</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Silva</surname>
              <given-names>E</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Neves</surname>
              <given-names>VF</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Catai</surname>
              <given-names>AM</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gallo</surname>
              <given-names>L</given-names>
              <suffix>Jr</suffix>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Silva de S&#225;</surname>
              <given-names>MF</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Comparison of anaerobic threshold determined by visual and mathematical methods in healthy women</article-title>
          <source>Braz J Med Biol Res</source>
          <year>2007</year>
          <volume>40</volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <fpage>501</fpage>
          <lpage>508</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24</label>
        <mixed-citation>24. American Heart Association. Committee on Exercise: exercise testing and training of apparently healthy individuals: a handbook for physicians. Dallas;1972.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <collab>American Heart Association</collab>
          </person-group>
          <source>Committee on Exercise: exercise testing and training of apparently healthy individuals: a handbook for physicians</source>
          <publisher-loc>Dallas</publisher-loc>
          <year>1972</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25</label>
        <mixed-citation>25. Woo JS, Derleth C, Stratton JR, Levy WC. The influence of age, gender, and training on exercise efficiency. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(5):1049-57.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Woo</surname>
              <given-names>JS</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Derleth</surname>
              <given-names>C</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Stratton</surname>
              <given-names>JR</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Levy</surname>
              <given-names>WC</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>The influence of age, gender, and training on exercise efficiency</article-title>
          <source>J Am Coll Cardiol</source>
          <year>2006</year>
          <volume>47</volume>
          <issue>5</issue>
          <fpage>1049</fpage>
          <lpage>1057</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26</label>
        <mixed-citation>26. Sim&#245;es RP, Bonjorno JC Jr, Beltrame T, Catai AM, Arena R, Borghi-Silva A. Slower heart rate and oxygen consumption kinetic responses in the on- and off-transient during a discontinuous incremental exercise: effects of aging. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17(1):69-76.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Sim&#245;es</surname>
              <given-names>RP</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bonjorno</surname>
              <given-names>JC</given-names>
              <suffix>Jr</suffix>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Beltrame</surname>
              <given-names>T</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Catai</surname>
              <given-names>AM</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Arena</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Borghi-Silva</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Slower heart rate and oxygen consumption kinetic responses in the on- and off-transient during a discontinuous incremental exercise: effects of aging</article-title>
          <source>Braz J Phys Ther</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          <volume>17</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>69</fpage>
          <lpage>76</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <label>27</label>
        <mixed-citation>27. Vanhecke TE, Franklin BA, Miller WM, de Jong AT, Coleman CJ, McCullough PA. Cardiorespiratory fitness and sedentary lifestyle in the morbidly obese. Clin Cardiol. 2009; 32(3):121-4.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Vanhecke</surname>
              <given-names>TE</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Franklin</surname>
              <given-names>BA</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Miller</surname>
              <given-names>WM</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>de Jong</surname>
              <given-names>AT</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Coleman</surname>
              <given-names>CJ</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>McCullough</surname>
              <given-names>PA</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Cardiorespiratory fitness and sedentary lifestyle in the morbidly obese</article-title>
          <source>Clin Cardiol</source>
          <year>2009</year>
          <volume>32</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>121</fpage>
          <lpage>124</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <label>28</label>
        <mixed-citation>28. Castello-Sim&#245;es V, Polaquini Sim&#245;es R, Beltrame T, Bassi D, Catai AM, Arena R, et al. Effects of aerobic exercise training on variability and heart rate kinetic during submaximal exercise after gastric bypass surgery-a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2013; 35(4):334-42.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Castello-Sim&#245;es</surname>
              <given-names>V</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Polaquini Sim&#245;es</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Beltrame</surname>
              <given-names>T</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bassi</surname>
              <given-names>D</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Catai</surname>
              <given-names>AM</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Arena</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Effects of aerobic exercise training on variability and heart rate kinetic during submaximal exercise after gastric bypass surgery-a randomized controlled trial</article-title>
          <source>Disabil Rehabil</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          <volume>35</volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <fpage>334</fpage>
          <lpage>342</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <label>29</label>
        <mixed-citation>29. Tabet JY, Meurin P, Ben Driss AB, Thabut G, Weber H, Renaud N, et al. Determination of exercise training heart rate in patients on B-blockers after myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006;13(4):538-43.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Tabet</surname>
              <given-names>JY</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Meurin</surname>
              <given-names>P</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ben Driss</surname>
              <given-names>AB</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Thabut</surname>
              <given-names>G</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Weber</surname>
              <given-names>H</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Renaud</surname>
              <given-names>N</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Determination of exercise training heart rate in patients on B-blockers after myocardial infarction</article-title>
          <source>Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil</source>
          <year>2006</year>
          <volume>13</volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <fpage>538</fpage>
          <lpage>543</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <label>30</label>
        <mixed-citation>30. Giallauria F, Galizia G, Lucci R, D'Agostino M, Vitelli A, Maresca L, et al. Favourable effects of exercise-based Cardiac Rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction on left atrial remodeling. Int J Cardiol. 2010;136(3):300-6.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Giallauria</surname>
              <given-names>F</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Galizia</surname>
              <given-names>G</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lucci</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>D'Agostino</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Vitelli</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Maresca</surname>
              <given-names>L</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Favourable effects of exercise-based Cardiac Rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction on left atrial remodeling</article-title>
          <source>Int J Cardiol</source>
          <year>2010</year>
          <volume>136</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>300</fpage>
          <lpage>306</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <label>31</label>
        <mixed-citation>31. Fallahi B, Beiki D, Akbarpour S, Gholamrezanezhad A, Fard-Esfahani A, Akhzari F, et al. Withholding or continuing beta-blocker treatment before dipyridamole myocardial perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease? A randomized clinical trial. Daru. 2013; 21(1):8.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Fallahi</surname>
              <given-names>B</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Beiki</surname>
              <given-names>D</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Akbarpour</surname>
              <given-names>S</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gholamrezanezhad</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Fard-Esfahani</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Akhzari</surname>
              <given-names>F</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Withholding or continuing beta-blocker treatment before dipyridamole myocardial perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease? A randomized clinical trial</article-title>
          <source>Daru</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          <volume>21</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>8</fpage>
          <lpage>8</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <label>32</label>
        <mixed-citation>32. Gobel FL, Nordstron LA, Nelson RR, Jorgensen CR, Wang Y. The rate-pressure product as an index of myocardial oxygen consumption during exercise in patients with angina pectoris. Circulation. 1978;57(3):549-56.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Gobel</surname>
              <given-names>FL</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Nordstron</surname>
              <given-names>LA</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Nelson</surname>
              <given-names>RR</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Jorgensen</surname>
              <given-names>CR</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Wang</surname>
              <given-names>Y</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>The rate-pressure product as an index of myocardial oxygen consumption during exercise in patients with angina pectoris</article-title>
          <source>Circulation</source>
          <year>1978</year>
          <volume>57</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>549</fpage>
          <lpage>556</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <label>33</label>
        <mixed-citation>33. Fornitano LD, Godoy MF. Increased rate-pressure product as predictor for the absence of significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with positive exercise test. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2006;86(2):136-44.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Fornitano</surname>
              <given-names>LD</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Godoy</surname>
              <given-names>MF</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Increased rate-pressure product as predictor for the absence of significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with positive exercise test</article-title>
          <source>Arq Bras Cardiol</source>
          <year>2006</year>
          <volume>86</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>136</fpage>
          <lpage>144</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <label>34</label>
        <mixed-citation>34. Patterson RP, Remole WD. The response of the oxygen pulse during a stress test in patients with coronary artery disease. Cardiology. 1981;67(1):52-62.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Patterson</surname>
              <given-names>RP</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Remole</surname>
              <given-names>WD</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>The response of the oxygen pulse during a stress test in patients with coronary artery disease</article-title>
          <source>Cardiology</source>
          <year>1981</year>
          <volume>67</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>52</fpage>
          <lpage>62</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <label>35</label>
        <mixed-citation>35. Laukkanen JA, Kurl S, Salonen JT, Lakka TA, Rauramaa R. Peak oxygen pulse during exercise as a predictor for coronary heart disease and all cause death. Heart. 2006;92(9):1219-24.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Laukkanen</surname>
              <given-names>JA</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kurl</surname>
              <given-names>S</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Salonen</surname>
              <given-names>JT</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lakka</surname>
              <given-names>TA</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Rauramaa</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Peak oxygen pulse during exercise as a predictor for coronary heart disease and all cause death</article-title>
          <source>Heart</source>
          <year>2006</year>
          <volume>92</volume>
          <issue>9</issue>
          <fpage>1219</fpage>
          <lpage>1224</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <label>36</label>
        <mixed-citation>36. Dhoble A, Lahr BD, Allison TG, Kopecky SL. Cardiopulmonary fitness and heart rate recovery as predictors of mortality in a referral population. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(2):e000559.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Dhoble</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lahr</surname>
              <given-names>BD</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Allison</surname>
              <given-names>TG</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kopecky</surname>
              <given-names>SL</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Cardiopulmonary fitness and heart rate recovery as predictors of mortality in a referral population</article-title>
          <source>J Am Heart Assoc</source>
          <year>2014</year>
          <volume>3</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <elocation-id>e000559</elocation-id>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <label>37</label>
        <mixed-citation>37. Borghi-Silva A, Labate V, Arena R, Bandera F, Generati G, Pellegrino M, et al. Exercise ventilatory power in heart failure patients: functional phenotypes definition by combining cardiopulmonary exercise testing with stress echocardiography. Int J Cardiol. 2014;176(3):1348-9.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Borghi-Silva</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Labate</surname>
              <given-names>V</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Arena</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bandera</surname>
              <given-names>F</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Generati</surname>
              <given-names>G</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Pellegrino</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Exercise ventilatory power in heart failure patients: functional phenotypes definition by combining cardiopulmonary exercise testing with stress echocardiography</article-title>
          <source>Int J Cardiol</source>
          <year>2014</year>
          <volume>176</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>1348</fpage>
          <lpage>1349</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <label>38</label>
        <mixed-citation>38. Neves VF, Silva de S&#225; MF, Gallo L Jr, Catai AM, Martins LE, Cresc&#234;ncio JC, et al. Autonomic modulation of heart rate of young and postmenopausal women undergoing estrogen therapy. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2007;40(4):491-9.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Neves</surname>
              <given-names>VF</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Silva de S&#225;</surname>
              <given-names>MF</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gallo</surname>
              <given-names>L</given-names>
              <suffix>Jr</suffix>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Catai</surname>
              <given-names>AM</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Martins</surname>
              <given-names>LE</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Cresc&#234;ncio</surname>
              <given-names>JC</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Autonomic modulation of heart rate of young and postmenopausal women undergoing estrogen therapy</article-title>
          <source>Braz J Med Biol Res</source>
          <year>2007</year>
          <volume>40</volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <fpage>491</fpage>
          <lpage>499</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <label>39</label>
        <mixed-citation>39. Perseguini NM, de Medeiros Takahashi AC, Milan JC, dos Santos PR, Neves VF, et al. Effect of hormone replacement therapy on cardiac autonomic modulation. Clin Aut Res. 2014;24(2):63-70.</mixed-citation>
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Perseguini</surname>
              <given-names>NM</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>de Medeiros Takahashi</surname>
              <given-names>AC</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Milan</surname>
              <given-names>JC</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>dos Santos</surname>
              <given-names>PR</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Neves</surname>
              <given-names>VF</given-names>
            </name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Effect of hormone replacement therapy on cardiac autonomic modulation</article-title>
          <source>Clin Aut Res</source>
          <year>2014</year>
          <volume>24</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>63</fpage>
          <lpage>70</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
  <sub-article article-type="translation" id="SA1" xml:lang="pt">
    <front-stub>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Pot&#234;ncia Circulat&#243;ria e Ventilat&#243;ria: Caracteriza&#231;&#227;o em Pacientes com Doen&#231;a Arterial Coronariana</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Castello-Sim&#245;es</surname>
            <given-names>Viviane</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff04">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c01"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Minatel</surname>
            <given-names>Vinicius</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff04">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Karsten</surname>
            <given-names>Marlus</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff04">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff02">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Sim&#245;es</surname>
            <given-names>Rodrigo Polaquini</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff04">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Perseguini</surname>
            <given-names>Nat&#225;lia Maria</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff04">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Milan</surname>
            <given-names>Juliana Cristina</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff04">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Arena</surname>
            <given-names>Ross</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff03">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Neves</surname>
            <given-names>Laura Maria Tomazi</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff04">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Borghi-Silva</surname>
            <given-names>Audrey</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff04">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Catai</surname>
            <given-names>Aparecida Maria</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff04">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff04">
        <label>1</label>
        <institution content-type="original">Laborat&#243;rio de Fisioterapia Cardiovascular, N&#250;cleo de Pesquisa em Exerc&#237;cio F&#237;sico, Universidade Federal de S&#227;o Carlos, S&#227;o Carlos, SP, Brasil</institution>
      </aff>
      <aff id="aff05">
        <label>2</label>
        <institution content-type="original">Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de Ci&#234;ncias da Sa&#250;de de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS &#8211; Brasil</institution>
      </aff>
      <aff id="aff06">
        <label>3</label>
        <institution content-type="original">Departamento de Fisioterapia e Laborat&#243;rio de Fisiologia Integrativa, Faculdade de Ci&#234;ncias Aplicadas da Sa&#250;de, Universidade de Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL &#8211; Estados Unidos</institution>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="c02"><bold>Correspond&#234;ncia: Viviane Castello Sim&#245;es</bold>, Universidade Federal de S&#227;o Carlos, SP, Brasil - Departamento de Fisioterapia. Rodovia Washington Luis km 235, Jardim Guanabara. CEP: 13565-905, S&#227;o Carlos, SP &#8211; Brasil E-mail:   <email>vivica_castello@yahoo.com.br</email></corresp>
        <fn fn-type="con">
          <p>
            <bold>Contribui&#231;&#227;o dos autores</bold>
          </p>
          <p>Concep&#231;&#227;o e desenho da pesquisa: Castello-Sim&#245;es V, Catai AM. Obten&#231;&#227;o de dados: Castello-Sim&#245;es V, Minatel V, Karsten M, Sim&#245;es RP, Perseguini NM, Milan JC, Neves LMT. An&#225;lise e interpreta&#231;&#227;o dos dados: Castello-Sim&#245;es V, Minatel V, Karsten M, Sim&#245;es RP, Perseguini NM, Milan JC, Arena R, Neves LMT, Catai AM. An&#225;lise estat&#237;stica: Castello-Sim&#245;es V, Minatel V, Karsten M, Sim&#245;es RP, Neves LMT, Borghi-Silva A. Obten&#231;&#227;o de financiamento: Castello-Sim&#245;es V, Karsten M, Perseguini NM, Catai AM. Reda&#231;&#227;o do manuscrito: Castello-Sim&#245;es V, Karsten M, Sim&#245;es RP, Catai AM. Revis&#227;o cr&#237;tica do manuscrito quanto ao conte&#250;do intelectual importante:Castello-Sim&#245;es V, Sim&#245;es RP, Arena R, Borghi-Silva A, Catai AM.</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="conflict">
          <p>
            <bold>Potencial Conflito de Interesse</bold>
          </p>
          <p>Declaro n&#227;o haver conflito de interesses pertinentes.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <abstract>
        <sec>
          <title>Fundamento:</title>
          <p>Os &#237;ndices da Pot&#234;ncia Circulat&#243;ria (PC) e Pot&#234;ncia Ventilat&#243;ria (PV) t&#234;m sido utilizados para avalia&#231;&#227;o cl&#237;nica de pacientes com insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca, mas nenhum estudo avaliou esses &#237;ndices em pacientes com Doen&#231;a Arterial Coronariana (DAC).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Objetivo:</title>
          <p>Caracterizar ambos os &#237;ndices em pacientes com DAC comparados a indiv&#237;duos saud&#225;veis.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>M&#233;todos:</title>
          <p>Oitenta e sete homens [grupo DAC = 42 sujeitos e, grupo controle (GC) = 45 sujeitos] com idade entre 45 e 65 anos foram inclu&#237;dos. Um Teste de Exerc&#237;cio Cardiopulmonar (TECP) foi realizado em esteira e as seguintes vari&#225;veis foram obtidas: 1) consumo de oxig&#234;nio (VO<sub>2</sub>) pico; 2) Frequ&#234;ncia Card&#237;aca (FC) pico; 3) Press&#227;o Arterial (PA) pico; 4) duplo produto pico (PA sist&#243;lica pico x FC pico); 5) pulso de oxig&#234;nio pico (VO<sub>2</sub> pico dividido pela FC pico); 6) efici&#234;ncia ventilat&#243;ria para o consumo de oxig&#234;nio (OUES); 7) efici&#234;ncia ventilat&#243;ria para a produ&#231;&#227;o de di&#243;xido de carbono (VE/VCO2   <italic>slope</italic>); 8) PC (VO<sub>2</sub> pico x PA sist&#243;lica pico); e 9) PV (PA sist&#243;lica pico dividido pelo VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>  <italic>slope</italic>).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Resultados:</title>
          <p>O grupo DAC apresentou valores significativamente menores das seguintes vari&#225;veis no pico do exerc&#237;cio: VO<sub>2</sub> (p &lt; 0,001), FC (p &lt; 0,001), PA sist&#243;lica (p &lt; 0,001), duplo produto (p &lt; 0,001), pulso de oxig&#234;nio (p = 0,008), OUES (p &lt; 0,001), PC (p &lt; 0,001) e PV (p &lt; 0,001), e valores significativamente maiores de PA diast&#243;lica (p = 0,004) e VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope (p &lt; 0,001) em rela&#231;&#227;o ao GC. Uma an&#225;lise de regress&#227;o pelo m&#233;todo   <italic>stepwise</italic> mostrou que a PC foi influenciada pelo grupo (R<sup>2</sup> = 0,44, p &lt; 0,001) e a PV tanto pelo grupo quanto pelo n&#250;mero de vasos com estenose p&#243;s tratamento (efeito de intera&#231;&#227;o: R<sup>2</sup> = 0,46, p &lt; 0,001).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Conclusion:</title>
          <p>Os &#237;ndices da PC e PV foram menores em homens com DAC comparados ao GC, podendo dessa forma ser utilizados na caracteriza&#231;&#227;o dessa popula&#231;&#227;o.</p>
        </sec>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>exerc&#237;cio</kwd>
        <kwd>consumo de oxig&#234;nio</kwd>
        <kwd>exerc&#237;cio cardiopulmonar</kwd>
        <kwd>doen&#231;a cardiovascular</kwd>
        <kwd>adultos</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <funding-group>
        <award-group>
          <funding-source>Funda&#231;&#227;o de Amparo &#224; Pesquisa do Estado de S&#227;o Paulo (FAPESP)</funding-source>
          <award-id>2010/52070-4</award-id>
        </award-group>
        <award-group>
          <funding-source>Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient&#237;fico e Tenol&#243;gico (CNPq)</funding-source>
          <award-id>483945/2007-2</award-id>
        </award-group>
        <funding-statement>O presente estudo foi financiado por Funda&#231;&#227;o de Amparo &#224; Pesquisa do Estado de S&#227;o Paulo (FAPESP), S&#227;o Paulo/SP/Brasil (processo: 2010/52070-4); Coordena&#231;&#227;o de Aperfei&#231;oamento de Pessoal de N&#237;vel Superior (CAPES), Bras&#237;lia/DF/Brasil; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient&#237;fico e Tenol&#243;gico (CNPq), Bras&#237;lia/DF/Brasil (processo: 483945/2007-2).</funding-statement>
      </funding-group>
    </front-stub>
    <body>
      <sec>
        <title>Introdu&#231;&#227;o</title>
        <p>O Teste de Exerc&#237;cio Cardiopulmonar (TECP) &#233; considerado padr&#227;o de refer&#234;ncia na avalia&#231;&#227;o das respostas cardiopulmonares e metab&#243;licas ante o esfor&#231;o aer&#243;bio em pacientes com doen&#231;as cardiovasculares a fim de determinar os mecanismos fisiopatol&#243;gicos da intoler&#226;ncia ao exerc&#237;cio<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B01">1</xref>. Alguns &#237;ndices, como o consumo de oxig&#234;nio (VO<sub>2</sub>) pico, a rela&#231;&#227;o linear entre a ventila&#231;&#227;o minuto/produ&#231;&#227;o de di&#243;xido de carbono (VE/VCO<sub>2  </sub><italic>slope</italic>)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B02">2</xref>, que representa a efici&#234;ncia ventilat&#243;ria para a produ&#231;&#227;o de di&#243;xido de carbono, e a rela&#231;&#227;o entre o VO<sub>2</sub> e a transformada logar&#237;tmica da VE, que representa a efici&#234;ncia ventilat&#243;ria para o consumo de oxig&#234;nio (OUES)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B03">3</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B04">4</xref>, t&#234;m sido utilizados para avaliar sujeitos saud&#225;veis<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B02">2</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B04">4</xref>, pacientes com insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B05">5</xref><sup>-</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B08">8</xref> e outros tipos de doen&#231;as card&#237;acas<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B09">9</xref>, como a Doen&#231;a Arterial Coronariana (DAC)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>.</p>
        <p>A Pot&#234;ncia Circulat&#243;ria (PC), uma recente vari&#225;vel derivada do TECP, apesar de ser avaliada com menos frequ&#234;ncia em rela&#231;&#227;o aos outros &#237;ndices tradicionais, tem se mostrado com grande potencial para a avalia&#231;&#227;o cl&#237;nica de diversas popula&#231;&#245;es<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref><sup>-</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>. A PC &#233; resultante do produto do VO<sub>2</sub> pico e da Press&#227;o Arterial (PA) sist&#243;lica pico, e baixos valores da PC prev&#234; um pior progn&#243;stico da doen&#231;a<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>. Mais recentemente, Forman e cols.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref> introduziram e avaliaram o uso de um novo &#237;ndice obtido por meio da divis&#227;o da PA sist&#243;lica pico pelo &#237;ndice VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>  <italic>slope</italic>, sendo denominada como Pot&#234;ncia Ventilat&#243;ria (PV). De acordo com os autores, um melhor progn&#243;stico &#233; refletido quando a PV apresenta maior valor, ou seja, maior PA e/ou menor VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>  <italic>slope</italic>.</p>
        <p>Enquanto essas vari&#225;veis t&#234;m sido avaliadas em pacientes com insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca, n&#243;s n&#227;o temos conhecimento de nenhum estudo pr&#233;vio que avaliou ambos os &#237;ndices da PC e PV em pacientes com DAC sem insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca tratados por meio de terapia farmacol&#243;gica, angioplastia coronariana ou cirurgia de revasculariza&#231;&#227;o do mioc&#225;rdio. Diante disso, a proposta do presente estudo foi testar a hip&#243;tese de que os &#237;ndices da PC e PV est&#227;o significativamente reduzidos na popula&#231;&#227;o com DAC quando comparados aos valores de sujeitos saud&#225;veis, mostrando assim outras medidas potencialmente valiosas da avalia&#231;&#227;o cardiopulmonar nessa popula&#231;&#227;o.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="methods">
        <title>M&#233;todos</title>
        <p>Este &#233; um estudo observacional, transversal e comparativo.</p>
        <sec>
          <title>Participantes</title>
          <p>Homens entre 45 e 65 anos foram alocados em dois grupos: 1) pacientes com DAC (GDAC) confirmado por cateterismo card&#237;aco e sem insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca e, 2) grupo controle (GC) composto de sujeitos aparentemente saud&#225;veis. Os sujeitos do GDAC foram recrutados na se&#231;&#227;o hemodin&#226;mica da Santa Casa de Miseric&#243;rdia de S&#227;o Carlos/SP/Brasil, j&#225; os sujeitos do GC foram identificados atrav&#233;s de uma base de dados do Laborat&#243;rio de Fisioterapia Cardiovascular, N&#250;cleo de Pesquisa em Exerc&#237;cio F&#237;sico, Universidade Federal de S&#227;o Carlos/SP/Brasil e posteriormente contatados e convidados para participa&#231;&#227;o no estudo. O per&#237;odo do estudo compreendeu entre junho de 2008 e abril de 2013. Os crit&#233;rios de inclus&#227;o do GDAC foram: 1) pacientes com DAC com ou sem infarto do mioc&#225;rdio (um m&#234;s a tr&#234;s anos ap&#243;s o evento) tratados atrav&#233;s de terapia farmacol&#243;gica ou atrav&#233;s de: a) reperfus&#227;o mec&#226;nica ou qu&#237;mica e/ou b) cirurgia de revasculariza&#231;&#227;o do mioc&#225;rdio (seis meses a tr&#234;s anos ap&#243;s a cirurgia) e, 2) fun&#231;&#227;o ventricular esquerda preservada com fra&#231;&#227;o de eje&#231;&#227;o &gt; 50%. Os crit&#233;rios de inclus&#227;o do GC foram: 1) sujeitos aparentemente saud&#225;veis baseado no exame cl&#237;nico e, 2) n&#227;o fazer uso de nenhuma medica&#231;&#227;o prescrita. Os crit&#233;rios de exclus&#227;o para ambos os grupos foram: 1) &#205;ndice de Massa Corp&#243;rea (IMC) &#8805; 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; 2) uso de tabaco; 3) etilismo; 4) limita&#231;&#245;es ortop&#233;dicas; 5) doen&#231;as neurol&#243;gicas; 6) diabetes; 7) hipertens&#227;o arterial sist&#234;mica n&#227;o controlada; 8) capacidade funcional &#8804; 4 MET (equivalente metab&#243;lico); 9) doen&#231;as pulmonares; 10) comportamento inapropriado da PA frente ao esfor&#231;o; 11) arritmia ventricular maligna; 12) fibrila&#231;&#227;o atrial; 13) batimento ventricular ect&#243;pico complexo; 14) taquicardia supraventricular ou sinusal; 15) bloqueio atrioventricular de segundo e/ou terceiro grau; 16) uso de marca-passo; e 17) participa&#231;&#227;o em um programa de exerc&#237;cio f&#237;sico regular nos &#250;ltimos seis meses pr&#233;vios &#224; inclus&#227;o no estudo. Este estudo foi aprovado pelo Comit&#234; de &#201;tica em Pesquisa com Seres Humanos local, e um termo consentimento livre e esclarecido foi obtido de cada individuo antes do inicio do estudo, o qual foi conduzido de acordo com a Declara&#231;&#227;o de Helsinki de 1975.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Procedimentos experimentais</title>
          <sec>
            <title>Exame cl&#237;nico</title>
            <p>Previamente ao in&#237;cio do estudo, todos os sujeitos foram submetidos a uma avalia&#231;&#227;o cl&#237;nica para caracteriza&#231;&#227;o do estado de sa&#250;de. Os sujeitos foram submetidos a: 1) exame cl&#237;nico card&#237;aco; 2) eletrocardiograma de repouso (Ecafix TC 500, S&#227;o Paulo, S&#227;o Paulo, Brasil); 3) teste de exerc&#237;cio m&#225;ximo/sintoma-limitado em esteira (DIGISTRESS Vega, Digitronica, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil) realizado por um m&#233;dico cardiologista e com suspens&#227;o da terapia farmacol&#243;gica, de acordo com as recomenda&#231;&#245;es da American Thoracic Society<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B01">1</xref> utilizando o protocolo de Bruce<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref> (sintoma de dispneia e fadiga de membros inferiores foram avaliados atrav&#233;s da Escala de Borg modificada<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref> e todos os sujeitos foram questionados sobre a ocorr&#234;ncia de angina durante cada est&#225;gio do protocolo de exerc&#237;cio); e 4) exames sangu&#237;neos: hemograma, glicemia, hemoglobina glicada, perfil lip&#237;dico, ureia, creatinina e &#225;cido &#250;rico. Ap&#243;s um per&#237;odo m&#237;nimo de repouso de 48 horas, todos os sujeitos considerados eleg&#237;veis realizaram um TECP, na presen&#231;a de terapia farmacol&#243;gica.</p>
          </sec>
          <sec>
            <title>Teste de exerc&#237;cio cardiopulmonar (TECP)</title>
            <p>No mesmo dia do TECP, a m&#225;xima velocidade de caminhada em esteira (Master ATL, Inbramed, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil) foi identificada previamente para cada sujeito, conforme descrito a seguir: velocidade inicial de 3,0 km/h sem inclina&#231;&#227;o seguida de ajustes na velocidade de 0,5 km/h a cada 30 segundos e, em seguida, a velocidade foi ajustada a uma taxa de 0,1 km/h at&#233; que o sujeito alcan&#231;asse uma cad&#234;ncia confort&#225;vel de m&#225;xima velocidade de caminhada, sem corrida<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>. Ap&#243;s a determina&#231;&#227;o da m&#225;xima velocidade de caminhada, um TECP sintoma&#8209;limitado foi realizado utilizando-se de um protocolo em rampa com an&#225;lise dos gases expirados (CPX-D, Medical Graphics, Saint Paul, Minnesota, Estados Unidos), conforme descrito a seguir: 1) um minuto em repouso na posi&#231;&#227;o ortost&#225;tica; 2) uma fase incremental, sendo a velocidade inicial de 0,8 km/h at&#233; o sujeito atingir a m&#225;xima velocidade de caminhada predeterminada; 3) 0,5% de aumento na inclina&#231;&#227;o a cada quinze segundos; 4) um minuto de recupera&#231;&#227;o ativa a 3,0 km/h; e 5) cinco minutos de recupera&#231;&#227;o passiva. Os gases expirados foram coletados respira&#231;&#227;o-a-respira&#231;&#227;o e calculados como m&#233;dias m&#243;veis a cada oito ciclos respirat&#243;rios (Breeze Suite 6.4.1, Medical Graphics, Saint Paul, Minnesota, Estados Unidos)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>. Os crit&#233;rios para interrup&#231;&#227;o do teste foram baseados no <italic>guidelines</italic> proposto por Mezzani e cols.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref> e Balady e cols.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>.</p>
            <p>Durante todo o TECP, o eletrocardiograma (doze deriva&#231;&#245;es simult&#226;neas) e a Frequ&#234;ncia Card&#237;aca (FC) foram monitorados e registrados (WinCardio, Micromed, Bras&#237;lia, Distrito Federal, Brasil). O delta da FC foi expresso como a FC pico menos a FC de repouso e, a FC m&#225;xima predita foi calculada por meio da f&#243;rmula: 220-idade em anos. A PA foi mensurada em repouso, a cada dois minutos do teste e durante todo o per&#237;odo de recupera&#231;&#227;o, por meio do m&#233;todo auscultat&#243;rio (BD, S&#227;o Paulo, S&#227;o Paulo, Brasil). O esfor&#231;o percebido (sintoma de dispneia e fadiga de membros inferiores) foi mensurado pela Escala de Borg modificada<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref> e todos os sujeitos foram questionados sobre a ocorr&#234;ncia de angina durante cada est&#225;gio do protocolo de exerc&#237;cio na qual foi realizado de acordo com o <italic>guidelines</italic> proposto<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>.</p>
            <p>VO<sub>2</sub> pico e o quociente respirat&#243;rio (RER) (raz&#227;o entre VCO<sub>2</sub> e VO<sub>2</sub>) foram definidos como o maior valor m&#233;dio observado nos &#250;ltimos trinta segundos do exerc&#237;cio<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>. O VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>  <italic>slope</italic> e o OUES foram calculados do inicio at&#233; o pico do exerc&#237;cio<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>; o VE/VCO<sub>2  </sub><italic>slope</italic> foi obtido atrav&#233;s de uma regress&#227;o linear, com o VE no eixo y e o VCO<sub>2</sub> no eixo x<sup>2</sup>. O OUES foi obtido por meio de uma rela&#231;&#227;o entre o VO<sub>2</sub> (no eixo y) e a transforma&#231;&#227;o logar&#237;tmica do VE (no eixo x)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B03">3</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B04">4</xref>. Outras vari&#225;veis foram calculadas: 1) duplo produto pico = PA sist&#243;lica pico x FC pico; 2) pulso de oxig&#234;nio pico = VO<sub>2</sub> pico dividido pela FC pico; 3) PC = VO<sub>2</sub> pico x PA sist&#243;lica pico<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>; e 4) PV = PA sist&#243;lica pico dividido pela VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>  <italic>slope</italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>.</p>
          </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Analise estat&#237;stica</title>
          <p>Baseado em um estudo piloto, usando os &#237;ndices da PC e PV como vari&#225;veis de desfecho (GDAC = 5 indiv&#237;duos e GC = 5 indiv&#237;duos), o tamanho amostral necess&#225;rio para se obter um poder estat&#237;stico suficiente (&#946; = 0,8) e detectar uma diferen&#231;a significativa (&#945; = 0,05) foi estimado em 21 e 12 sujeitos (PC e PV, respectivamente) em cada grupo (GPower software package, version 3.1.6, Kiel, Schleswig&#8209;Holstein, Alemanha). O teste de Kolmogorov-Smirnov foi utilizado para analisar a distribui&#231;&#227;o dos dados. As vari&#225;veis quantitativas cont&#237;nuas foram expressas em m&#233;dia e desvio padr&#227;o e as vari&#225;veis categ&#243;ricas expressas em valor absoluto e porcentagem. A dispneia e a fadiga de membros inferiores relatadas pelos sujeitos foram expressas em mediana [m&#237;nimo - m&#225;ximo]. O teste-<italic>t</italic> de Student n&#227;o pareado foi utilizado para comparar as vari&#225;veis quantitativas cont&#237;nuas entre o GDAC e o GC e, o Teste exato de Fischer foi utilizado para comparar as vari&#225;veis categ&#243;ricas entre os grupos e para comparar os dados das situa&#231;&#245;es pr&#233; e p&#243;s tratamento do GDAC. Uma an&#225;lise de regress&#227;o pelo m&#233;todo <italic>stepwise</italic> foi realizada para determinar a poss&#237;vel influ&#234;ncia do grupo, terapia farmacol&#243;gica (betabloqueadores, inibidores da enzima conversora de angiotensina, diur&#233;ticos, estatinas e antiplaquet&#225;rios/ anticoagulantes), fatores de risco (hipertens&#227;o e dislipidemia) e n&#250;mero de vasos com estenose p&#243;s-tratamento nas principais vari&#225;veis estudadas (FC, PA, VO<sub>2</sub>, VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>  <italic>slope</italic>, PC e PV). Anova <italic>one-way</italic>(<italic>post-hoc</italic> de Tukey) foi realizada subdividindo os grupos de acordo com o tipo de evento e tratamento a fim de avaliar poss&#237;veis diferen&#231;as entre os subgrupos. An&#225;lise de correla&#231;&#227;o de Pearson foi aplicada para avaliar a rela&#231;&#227;o entre a PC e PV com o VO<sub>2</sub> pico, OUES, duplo produto pico e pulso de oxig&#234;nio pico. A probabilidade de ocorr&#234;ncia do erro Tipo 1 foi estabelecida em 5% para todos os testes (p &lt; 0,05). O <italic>software</italic>SPSS (vers&#227;o 17.0, Chicago, Illinois, Estados Unidos) foi utilizado para realizar as an&#225;lises estat&#237;sticas.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="results">
        <title>Resultados</title>
        <p>De um total de 97 sujeitos aparentemente saud&#225;veis presente em nossa base de dados, n&#243;s exclu&#237;mos 52 sujeitos com idade inferior a 45 anos ou superior a 65 anos, dessa forma 45 sujeitos foram contatados para compor o GC. Em rela&#231;&#227;o ao GDAC, 54 sujeitos foram recrutados, por&#233;m, 12 sujeitos foram exclu&#237;dos ap&#243;s o exame cl&#237;nico devido a IMC &#8805; 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (n = 2), uso de tabaco (n = 2), doen&#231;a pulmonar obstrutiva cr&#244;nica (n = 2), presen&#231;a de arritmias card&#237;acas (n = 2), hipertens&#227;o arterial sist&#234;mica n&#227;o controlada (n = 1), reestenose ap&#243;s reperfus&#227;o mec&#226;nica (n = 2) e, incapacidade de realizar o teste de exerc&#237;cio m&#225;ximo/sintoma-limitado (n = 1). Assim nossa amostra foi composta por 87 homens (42 no G-DAC e 45 no GC).</p>
        <p>&#201; importante enfatizar que uma an&#225;lise pr&#233;via (ANOVA <italic>one-way</italic>) foi realizada subdividindo o GDAC de acordo com o tipo de evento e tratamento; os resultados mostraram que n&#227;o houve diferen&#231;a significativa entre os subgrupos para todas as vari&#225;veis estudas e, portanto, n&#243;s agrupamos os dados de todos os sujeitos em um s&#243; grupo (GDAC).</p>
        <p>As caracter&#237;sticas do GDAC e do GC est&#227;o presentes na <xref ref-type="table" rid="t04">tabela 1</xref>. Nenhuma diferen&#231;a significativa foi encontrada entre os grupos em rela&#231;&#227;o &#224; idade (p = 0,087), estatura (p = 0,318), massa corp&#243;rea (p = 0,165) e IMC (p = 0,222). Em rela&#231;&#227;o aos dados cl&#237;nicos do GDAC, a maioria dos pacientes na situa&#231;&#227;o pr&#233;-tratamento apresentavam dois vasos com estenose (33%) e, considerando somente os 41 sujeitos com estenose o vaso mais afetado foi a art&#233;ria descendente anterior (78%). Na situa&#231;&#227;o p&#243;s&#8209;tratamento, a maioria dos pacientes permaneceram com um vaso estenosado (48%) e, considerando somente os 29 sujeitos com estenose o vaso mais afetado foi a art&#233;ria circunflexa (45%). A maioria dos sujeitos do G-DAC (76%) tinham sofrido infarto do mioc&#225;rdio e foram tratados da seguinte forma: 1) 2% somente com terapia farmacol&#243;gica; 2) 60% submetidos &#224; angioplastia coronariana; e 3) 14% submetidos &#224; cirurgia de revasculariza&#231;&#227;o do mioc&#225;rdio. O restante dos sujeitos do GDAC que n&#227;o sofreram infarto do mioc&#225;rdio (24%) foram tratados da seguinte forma: 1) 5% foram tratados somente com terapia farmacol&#243;gica; 2) 7% submetidos &#224; angioplastia coronariana; e 3) 12% submetidos &#224; cirurgia de revasculariza&#231;&#227;o do mioc&#225;rdio (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t04">Tabela 1</xref>). Dos 42 sujeitos do GDAC, 15 tinham passado de tabagismo e nenhum era diab&#233;tico; al&#233;m disso, 38 sujeitos do GDAC foram diagnosticados com hipertens&#227;o arterial sist&#234;mica (controlada) e 39 com dislipidemia, ambas tratadas por meio de terapia farmacol&#243;gica. Dos 45 sujeitos do GC, 3 tinham passado de tabagismo e nenhum sujeito tinha diagn&#243;stico de diabetes, hipertens&#227;o arterial sist&#234;mica ou dislipidemia, portanto n&#227;o faziam uso de nenhuma medica&#231;&#227;o prescrita (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t04">Tabela 1</xref>).</p>
        <table-wrap id="t04">
          <label>Tabela 1</label>
          <caption>
            <title>Caracter&#237;sticas do G-DAC e GC</title>
          </caption>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>&#160;</th>
                <th colspan="2" align="center">
                  <bold>G-DAC (n = 42)</bold>
                </th>
                <th align="center">
                  <bold>GC (n = 45)</bold>
                </th>
                <th align="center">
                  <bold>Valor de p</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Idade, anos</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">54,3 &#177; 6,6</td>
                <td align="center">53,9 &#177; 6,4</td>
                <td align="center">0,087</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="5">
                  <bold>Antropometria</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Estatura, m</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">1,70 &#177; 0,07</td>
                <td align="center">1,73 &#177; 0,13</td>
                <td align="center">0,318</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Massa corp&#243;rea, kg</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">79,0 &#177; 12,3</td>
                <td align="center">76,9 &#177; 9,9</td>
                <td align="center">0,165</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>&#205;ndice de massa corp&#243;rea, kg/m<sup>2</sup></td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">27 &#177; 3,9</td>
                <td align="center">26 &#177; 5,9</td>
                <td align="center">0,222</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="5">
                  <bold>Fun&#231;&#227;o card&#237;aca</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FEVE, %</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">63,9 &#177; 7,1</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Vasos com estenose, n (%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td align="center">
                  <bold>Before treatment (n = 42)</bold>
                </td>
                <td align="center">
                  <bold>After treatment (n = 42)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">&#160;</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Sem estenose</td>
                <td align="center">1 (2)</td>
                <td align="center">13 (31)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Um vaso com estenose</td>
                <td align="center">10 (24)</td>
                <td align="center">20 (48)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">0,039</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Dois vasos com estenose</td>
                <td align="center">14 (33)</td>
                <td align="center">6 (14)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">0,071</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Tr&#234;s vasos com estenose</td>
                <td align="center">8 (19)</td>
                <td align="center">3 (7)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">0,194</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Multiarterial (&gt; 3 vasos com estenose)</td>
                <td align="center">9 (22)</td>
                <td align="center">0</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">0,002</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Localiza&#231;&#227;o da estenose (&gt; 50%), n (%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td align="center">
                  <bold>Pr&#233; tratamento (n = 41)</bold>
                </td>
                <td align="center">
                  <bold>P&#243;s tratamento (n = 29)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">&#160;</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Art&#233;ria descendente anterior</td>
                <td align="center">32 (78)</td>
                <td align="center">8 (28)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Art&#233;ria circunflexa</td>
                <td align="center">26 (63)</td>
                <td align="center">13 (45)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">0,147</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Art&#233;ria coron&#225;ria direita</td>
                <td align="center">24 (58)</td>
                <td align="center">10 (34)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">0,056</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Art&#233;rias diagonais</td>
                <td align="center">8 (19)</td>
                <td align="center">6 (21)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">1,000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Art&#233;rias marginais</td>
                <td align="center">4 (10)</td>
                <td align="center">1 (3)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">0,394</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="5">
                  <bold>Caracter&#237;sticas da DAC, n (%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="5">
                  <bold>Com infarto do mioc&#225;rdio</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Tratados somente com medica&#231;&#227;o</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">1 (2)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Tratados com angioplastia</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">25 (60)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Tratados com CRM</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">6 (14)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="5">
                  <bold>Sem infarto do mioc&#225;rdio</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Tratados somente com medica&#231;&#227;o</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">2 (5)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Tratados com angioplastia</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">3 (7)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Tratados com CRM</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">5 (12)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="5">
                  <bold>Fatores de risco, n (%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Passado de tabagismo</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">15 (36)</td>
                <td align="center">3 (7)</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Diabetes</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">0</td>
                <td align="center">0</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Hipertens&#227;o arterial</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">38 (90)</td>
                <td align="center">0</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Dislipidemia</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">39 (93)</td>
                <td align="center">0</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="5">
                  <bold>Medica&#231;&#245;es, n (%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Betabloqueador</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">37 (88)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Inibidor da ECA</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">24 (57)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Diur&#233;tico</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">12 (29)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Estatina</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">39 (93)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Antiplaquet&#225;rio/ anticoagulante</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">42 (100)</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn>
              <p>Dados apresentados em m&#233;dia &#177; desvio padr&#227;o ou valor absoluto (%).</p>
              <p>GDAC: grupo com doen&#231;a arterial coronariana; GC: grupo controle; n: n&#250;mero de sujeitos; FEVE: fra&#231;&#227;o de eje&#231;&#227;o do ventr&#237;culo esquerdo; DAC: doen&#231;a arterial coronariana; CRM: cirurgia de revasculariza&#231;&#227;o do mioc&#225;rdio; (-): n&#227;o aplic&#225;vel; ECA: enzima conversora de angiotensina. Teste-t de Student n&#227;o pareado e Teste exato de Fischer.</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>A <xref ref-type="table" rid="t05">tabela 2</xref> mostra a compara&#231;&#227;o entre os grupos em rela&#231;&#227;o &#224;s vari&#225;veis pico do teste de exerc&#237;cio m&#225;ximo/sintoma limitado, o qual precedeu o TECP; o GDAC apresentou valores significativamente menores de FC (p &lt; 0,001) e PA sist&#243;lica (p = 0,012) e, maiores valores de PA diast&#243;lica (p = 0,016), de sintomas de dispneia e de fadiga de membros inferiores (p &lt; 0,001 e p = 0,008, respectivamente) em rela&#231;&#227;o ao GC. Al&#233;m disso, a ocorr&#234;ncia de angina (relatada pelos sujeitos) esteve presente em somente 5% dos sujeitos do GDAC (n = 2) e n&#227;o esteve presente em nenhum sujeito do GC. Por meio da monitoriza&#231;&#227;o do eletrocardiograma durante o esfor&#231;o, pudemos observar que 7% dos sujeitos do GDAC (n = 3) apresentaram depress&#227;o do segmento ST &lt; 2 mm e, 5% (n = 2) apresentaram depress&#227;o do segmento ST &#8805; 2 mm. Nenhuma anormalidade no eletrocardiograma foi observada no GC (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t05">Tabela 2</xref>).</p>
        <table-wrap id="t05">
          <label>Tabela 2</label>
          <caption>
            <title>Vari&#225;veis pico obtidas durante o teste de exerc&#237;cio m&#225;ximo/sintoma-limitado para avalia&#231;&#227;o cl&#237;nica do GDAC e GC</title>
          </caption>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>&#160;</th>
                <th align="center">
                  <bold>GDAC (n = 42)</bold>
                </th>
                <th align="center">
                  <bold>GC (n = 45)</bold>
                </th>
                <th colspan="2" align="center">Valor de p</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>FC (bpm)</td>
                <td align="center">144,9 &#177; 20,0</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">169,9 &#177; 19,1</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>PA sist&#243;lica (mmHg)</td>
                <td align="center">175,7 &#177; 26,5</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">189,5 &#177; 22,3</td>
                <td align="center">0,012</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>PA diast&#243;lica (mmHg)</td>
                <td align="center">91,3 &#177; 11,8</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">85,0 &#177; 11,2</td>
                <td align="center">0,016</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Sintoma de dispneia (0-10)</td>
                <td align="center">7,0 [2 - 10]</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">4,0 [2 - 6]</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fadiga de membros inferiores (0-10)</td>
                <td align="center">6,0 [0 - 10]</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">4,5 [2 - 5]</td>
                <td align="center">0,008</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Angina (n) (%)</td>
                <td align="center">2 (5)</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">0</td>
                <td align="center">0,230</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Depress&#227;o do segmento ST &lt; 2 mm (n) (%)</td>
                <td align="center">3 (7)</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">0</td>
                <td align="center">0,108</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Depress&#227;o do segmento ST &#8805; 2 mm (n) (%)</td>
                <td align="center">2 (5)</td>
                <td colspan="2" align="center">0</td>
                <td align="center">0,230</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn>
              <p>Dados apresentados em m&#233;dia &#177; desvio padr&#227;o, mediana [m&#237;nimo - m&#225;ximo] ou valor absoluto (%).</p>
              <p>GDAC: grupo com doen&#231;a arterial coronariana; GC: grupo controle; n: n&#250;mero de sujeitos: FC: frequ&#234;ncia card&#237;aca; PA: press&#227;o arterial. Teste-t de Student n&#227;o pareado e Teste exato de Fischer.</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Durante o TECP, a m&#225;xima velocidade de caminhada foi significativamente menor no GDAC (6,2 &#177; 0,4 km/h, variando entre 5 e 7 km/h) em rela&#231;&#227;o ao GC (7,1 &#177; 0,7 km/h, variando entre 6 e 8 km/h (p &lt; 0,001), mas n&#227;o houve diferen&#231;a significativa entre os grupos em rela&#231;&#227;o &#224; inclina&#231;&#227;o: 12,8 &#177; 4,9% no GDAC (variando entre 3,5 e 22%) e 11,6 &#177; 5,6 % no GC (variando entre 2,5 e 21%) (p = 0,311). As principais vari&#225;veis do TECP e a classifica&#231;&#227;o funcional aer&#243;bia (de acordo com a American Heart Association - AHA)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref> de ambos os grupos est&#227;o presentes na tabela 3. N&#227;o houve diferen&#231;a significativa entre os grupos durante o repouso em rela&#231;&#227;o a FC e PA. Durante o pico do esfor&#231;o, o GDAC apresentou valores significativamente menores de VO<sub>2</sub> (p &lt; 0,001), FC (p &lt; 0,001), % da FC m&#225;xima predita (p &lt; 0,001), delta da FC (p &lt; 0,001), PA sist&#243;lica (p &lt; 0,001), duplo produto (p &lt; 0,001), pulso de oxig&#234;nio (p = 0,008), OUES (p &lt; 0,001), PC (p &lt; 0,001) e PV (p &lt; 0,001) comparado ao GC; em adi&#231;&#227;o, durante o pico de esfor&#231;o, o GDAC apresentou valores significativamente maiores de PA diast&#243;lica (p &lt; 0,001), VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>  <italic>slope</italic> (p = 0,004), sintomas de dispneia e fadiga de membros inferiores (p = 0,008 e p &lt; 0,001, respectivamente) comparativamente ao GC. Al&#233;m disso, a ocorr&#234;ncia de angina (relatada pelos sujeitos) esteve presente em somente 2% dos sujeitos do GDAC (n = 1) e n&#227;o esteve presente em nenhum sujeito do GC. Por meio da monitoriza&#231;&#227;o do eletrocardiograma, observamos que nenhum sujeito de ambos os grupos apresentou qualquer altera&#231;&#227;o eletrocardiogr&#225;fica durante o esfor&#231;o. Em rela&#231;&#227;o &#224; capacidade funcional aer&#243;bia de acordo com a AHA<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>, a <xref ref-type="table" rid="t06">tabela 3</xref> mostra que a maioria dos pacientes do GDAC apresentou uma classifica&#231;&#227;o funcional aer&#243;bia fraca (53%), enquanto no GC a maioria apresentou uma classifica&#231;&#227;o funcional aer&#243;bia regular (53%).</p>
        <table-wrap id="t06">
          <label>Tabela 3</label>
          <caption>
            <title>Vari&#225;veis obtidas durante o teste de exerc&#237;cio cardiopulmonar e classifica&#231;&#227;o funcional aer&#243;bia de acordo com a American Heart Association do GDAC e GC</title>
          </caption>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>&#160;</th>
                <th align="center">
                  <bold>GDAC (n = 42)</bold>
                </th>
                <th align="center">
                  <bold>GC (n = 45)</bold>
                </th>
                <th align="center">
                  <bold>Valor de p</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>Repouso</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FC (bpm)</td>
                <td align="center">65,9 &#177; 11</td>
                <td align="center">69,7 &#177; 11</td>
                <td align="center">0,110</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>PA sist&#243;lica (mmHg)</td>
                <td align="center">120,7 &#177; 10,7</td>
                <td align="center">117,4 &#177; 18,7</td>
                <td align="center">0,298</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>PA diast&#243;lica (mmHg)</td>
                <td align="center">82,6 &#177; 7,6</td>
                <td align="center">79,7 &#177; 9,6</td>
                <td align="center">0,103</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>Pico</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>VO<sub>2</sub>, ml,kg<sup>&#8722;1</sup>min<sup>&#8722;1</sup></td>
                <td align="center">22,9 &#177; 4,8</td>
                <td align="center">32,7 &#177; 6,6</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>RER</td>
                <td align="center">1,11 &#177; 0,07</td>
                <td align="center">1,12 &#177; 0,08</td>
                <td align="center">0,738</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FC (bpm)</td>
                <td align="center">135,4 &#177; 22,2</td>
                <td align="center">165,0 &#177; 18,7</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>% da FC m&#225;xima predita</td>
                <td align="center">81,8 &#177; 13,4</td>
                <td align="center">97,7 &#177; 9,9</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Delta da FC (bpm)</td>
                <td align="center">52,7 &#177; 23,1</td>
                <td align="center">85,2 &#177; 20,7</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>PA sist&#243;lica (mmHg)</td>
                <td align="center">169,8 &#177; 24,6</td>
                <td align="center">186,1 &#177; 19,8</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>PA diast&#243;lica (mmHg)</td>
                <td align="center">88,3 &#177; 9,9</td>
                <td align="center">80,1 &#177; 10,7</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Duplo produto (mmHg,bpm)</td>
                <td align="center">23052 &#177; 4889</td>
                <td align="center">30713 &#177; 4800</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pulso de oxig&#234;nio (ml/batimento)</td>
                <td align="center">13,5 &#177; 2,9</td>
                <td align="center">15,4 &#177; 3,8</td>
                <td align="center">0,008</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>  <italic>slope</italic></td>
                <td align="center">31,6 &#177; 5,2</td>
                <td align="center">28,6 &#177; 4,4</td>
                <td align="center">0,004</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>OUES</td>
                <td align="center">1963 &#177; 449,7</td>
                <td align="center">2555 &#177; 552</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>PC, mmHg,ml,kg<sup>&#8722;1</sup>min<sup>&#8722;1</sup></td>
                <td align="center">3902 &#177; 1016</td>
                <td align="center">6099 &#177; 1403</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>PV, mmHg</td>
                <td align="center">5,5 &#177; 1,2</td>
                <td align="center">6,6 &#177; 1,3</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Sintoma de dispneia (0-10)</td>
                <td align="center">6,0 [4 - 8]</td>
                <td align="center">4,5 [2 - 5]</td>
                <td align="center">0,008</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fadiga de membros inferiores (0-10)</td>
                <td align="center">7,0 [4 - 9]</td>
                <td align="center">4,5 [2 - 6]</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Angina (n) (%)</td>
                <td align="center">1 (2)</td>
                <td align="center">0</td>
                <td align="center">0,230</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Depress&#227;o do segmento ST &lt; 2 mm (n) (%)</td>
                <td align="center">0</td>
                <td align="center">0</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Depress&#227;o do segmento ST &#8805; 2 mm (n) (%)</td>
                <td align="center">0</td>
                <td align="center">0</td>
                <td align="center">-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>Classifica&#231;&#227;o funcional aer&#243;bia (n) (%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Muito fraca</td>
                <td align="center">6 (14)</td>
                <td align="center">1 (2)</td>
                <td align="center">0,052</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fraca</td>
                <td align="center">22 (53)</td>
                <td align="center">3 (7)</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Regular</td>
                <td align="center">14 (33)</td>
                <td align="center">24 (53)</td>
                <td align="center">0,083</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Boa</td>
                <td align="center">0</td>
                <td align="center">15 (33)</td>
                <td align="center">&lt; 0,001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Excelente</td>
                <td align="center">0</td>
                <td align="center">2 (5)</td>
                <td align="center">0,494</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn>
              <p>Dados apresentados em m&#233;dia &#177; desvio padr&#227;o, mediana [m&#237;nimo - m&#225;ximo] ou valor absoluto (%).</p>
              <p>GDAC: grupo com doen&#231;a arterial coronariana; GC: grupo controle; n: n&#250;mero de sujeitos; FC: frequ&#234;ncia card&#237;aca; PA: press&#227;o arterial; VO2: consumo de oxig&#234;nio; RER: quociente respirat&#243;rio; % da FC m&#225;xima predita: % 220 menos a idade; Delta da FC: FC pico menos a FC de repouso; VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope: rela&#231;&#227;o linear entre a ventila&#231;&#227;o e a produ&#231;&#227;o de di&#243;xido de carbono; OUES: rela&#231;&#227;o linear entre o consumo de oxig&#234;nio e a ventila&#231;&#227;o; PC: pot&#234;ncia circulat&#243;ria; PV: pot&#234;ncia ventilat&#243;ria. Teste-t de Student n&#227;o pareado e Teste exato de Fischer.</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Uma an&#225;lise de regress&#227;o pelo m&#233;todo <italic>stepwise</italic> foi realizada para determinar a poss&#237;vel influ&#234;ncia do grupo, terapia farmacol&#243;gica (betabloqueadores, inibidores da enzima conversora de angiotensina, diur&#233;ticos, estatinas e antiplaquet&#225;rios/ anticoagulantes), fatores de risco (hipertens&#227;o arterial sist&#234;mica e dislipidemia) e n&#250;mero de vasos com estenose p&#243;s-tratamento nas vari&#225;veis de interesse do TECP. Dessa forma, as seguintes influ&#234;ncias foram observadas: 1) VO<sub>2</sub> pico foi influenciado pelo grupo e pela terapia farmacol&#243;gica (efeito de intera&#231;&#227;o: R<sup>2</sup> = 0,46, &#946; do grupo = 0,95 e &#946; da terapia farmacol&#243;gica = -0,35, p &lt; 0,001); 2) PA sist&#243;lica pico foi influenciada somente pela terapia farmacol&#243;gica (R<sup>2</sup>= 0,11, &#946; = 0,34, p &lt; 0,001); 3) VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>  <italic>slope</italic> foi influenciado somente pelo grupo (R<sup>2</sup>= 0,08, &#946; = 0,30, p &lt; 0,001); 4) PC foi influenciada somente pelo grupo (R<sup>2</sup> = 0,44, &#946; = 0,67, p &lt; 0,001); e 5) PV foi influenciada pelo grupo e pelo n&#250;mero de vasos com estenose p&#243;s tratamento (efeito de intera&#231;&#227;o: R<sup>2</sup> = 0,46, &#946; do grupo = 0,62 e &#946; do n&#250;mero de vasos com estenose p&#243;s tratamento = -0,30, p &lt; 0,001).</p>
        <p>A <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f03">figura 1</xref> ilustra a correla&#231;&#227;o dos &#237;ndices da PC e PV com o VO<sub>2</sub> pico, considerando os sujeitos de acordo com a classifica&#231;&#227;o funcional aer&#243;bia<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>. Para melhor visualiza&#231;&#227;o da figura 1, somente aqueles sujeitos com classifica&#231;&#227;o funcional aer&#243;bia fraca (n = 22) e regular (n = 14) do GDAC e, aqueles com classifica&#231;&#227;o funcional aer&#243;bia regular (n = 24) e boa (n = 15) do GC foram inclu&#237;dos na an&#225;lise estat&#237;stica e na apresenta&#231;&#227;o da figura. Com respeito a PC, houve uma correla&#231;&#227;o positiva forte e significativa com o VO<sub>2</sub> pico (Figura 1A, r = 0,91, p &lt; 0,001) e, em rela&#231;&#227;o a PV houve uma correla&#231;&#227;o positiva moderada e significativa com o VO<sub>2</sub> pico (Figura 1B, r = 0,43, p &lt; 0,001).</p>
        <fig id="f03">
          <label>Figura 1</label>
          <caption>
            <title>Pot&#234;ncia circulat&#243;ria (A) e ventilat&#243;ria (B) correlacionadas com o consumo de oxig&#234;nio de acordo com a classifica&#231;&#227;o funcional aer&#243;bia da American Heart Association. Legenda: PA: pot&#234;ncia circulat&#243;ria; PV: pot&#234;ncia ventilat&#243;ria, VO<sub>2</sub>: consumo de oxig&#234;nio; (&#959;): grupo com doen&#231;a arterial coronariana (GDAC) com classifica&#231;&#227;o fraca; (&#8226;): GDAC com classifica&#231;&#227;o regular; (&#916;): grupo controle (GC) com classifica&#231;&#227;o regular; (&#9650;): GC com classifica&#231;&#227;o boa. An&#225;lise de correla&#231;&#227;o de Pearson.</title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="1678-4170-abc-104-06-0476-50035-gf01-pt.jpg"/></fig>
        <p>A <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f04">figura 2</xref> ilustra as correla&#231;&#245;es dos &#237;ndices da PC e PV com outros obtidos a partir do TECP (OUES, duplo produto e pulso de oxig&#234;nio), considerando todos os sujeitos do estudo. Com respeito &#224; PC, houve uma correla&#231;&#227;o positiva forte e significativa com o OUES (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f04">Figura 2A</xref>, r = 0,75, p &lt; 0,001) e o duplo produto pico (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f04">Figura 2C</xref>, r = 0,74, p &lt; 0,001), al&#233;m disso, houve uma correla&#231;&#227;o positiva moderada e significativa com o pulso de oxig&#234;nio pico (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f04">Figura 2E</xref>, r = 0,59, p &lt; 0,001); em rela&#231;&#227;o a PV houve uma correla&#231;&#227;o positiva moderada e significativa com o OUES (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f04">Figura 2B</xref>, r = 0,55, p &lt; 0,001), duplo produto pico (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f04">Figura 2D</xref>, r = 0,58, p &lt; 0,001) e pulso de oxig&#234;nio pico (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f04">Figura 2F</xref>, r = 0,55, p &lt; 0,001).</p>
        <fig id="f04">
          <label>Figura 2</label>
          <caption>
            <title>Pot&#234;ncia circulat&#243;ria e ventilat&#243;ria correlacionadas com a efici&#234;ncia para o consumo de oxig&#234;nio (A e B), duplo produto (C e D) e pulso de oxig&#234;nio (E e F). Legenda: PA: pot&#234;ncia circulat&#243;ria; PV: pot&#234;ncia ventilat&#243;ria; (&#959;): grupo com doen&#231;a arterial coronariana (GDAC); (&#8226;): grupo controle (GC); OUES: rela&#231;&#227;o linear entre o consumo de oxig&#234;nio e a ventila&#231;&#227;o. An&#225;lise de correla&#231;&#227;o de Pearson.</title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="1678-4170-abc-104-06-0476-50035-gf02-pt.jpg"/></fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="discussion">
        <title>Discuss&#227;o</title>
        <p>Os principais achados do presente estudo foram: 1) pacientes com DAC sem insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca, tratados por meio de f&#225;rmacos, de angioplastia coronariana ou de cirurgia de revasculariza&#231;&#227;o do mioc&#225;rdio apresentaram menores valores da PC e PV comparado ao GC; 2) os &#237;ndices da PC e PV apresentaram correla&#231;&#227;o positiva com o VO<sub>2</sub> de acordo com a classifica&#231;&#227;o funcional aer&#243;bia da AHA<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>; e 3) por meio das respostas das vari&#225;veis metab&#243;licas, ventilat&#243;rias e cardiovasculares obtidas durante o TECP, pudemos observar que o GDAC apresentou uma menor capacidade funcional e piores respostas durante o esfor&#231;o f&#237;sico.</p>
        <p>Para nosso conhecimento, este &#233; o primeiro estudo a introduzir os &#237;ndices da PC e PV na avalia&#231;&#227;o funcional de sujeitos com DAC sem insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca, comparados a um grupo de sujeitos saud&#225;veis. Diante disso, nossos achados t&#234;m um grande potencial e relev&#226;ncia cl&#237;nica, uma vez que esses &#237;ndices podem ser utilizados para avaliar a capacidade funcional durante o processo evolutivo da doen&#231;a. A potencial vantagem dos &#237;ndices da PC e PV &#233; que ambos s&#227;o simples de serem avaliados e n&#227;o invasivos e, sinergisticamente combinam &#237;ndices &#250;nicos relacionados &#224; integridade cardiovascular e sa&#250;de.</p>
        <sec>
          <title>Caracter&#237;sticas da amostra</title>
          <p>Conforme mostra a <xref ref-type="table" rid="t04">tabela 1</xref>, n&#227;o houve diferen&#231;a entre os grupos em rela&#231;&#227;o a idade; essa &#233; uma importante considera&#231;&#227;o, visto que o processo de envelhecimento afeta o VO<sub>2</sub> pico<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>. Adicionalmente, n&#227;o inclu&#237;mos no presente estudo indiv&#237;duos obesos pelo fato de que esses apresentam respostas alteradas durante o exerc&#237;cio f&#237;sico em rela&#231;&#227;o a indiv&#237;duos eutr&#243;ficos, o que poderia confundir nossos achados<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>. Embora tenhamos inclu&#237;do no GDAC pacientes com hipertens&#227;o arterial sist&#234;mica e dislipidemia, ambas controladas, observamos que esses fatores de risco n&#227;o influenciaram as respostas ao TECP, avaliados por meio da an&#225;lise de regress&#227;o pelo m&#233;todo <italic>stepwise</italic>.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Teste de exerc&#237;cio cardiopulmonar (TECP)</title>
          <p>A PC e PV apresentaram-se menores no GDAC em rela&#231;&#227;o ao GC, assim como as vari&#225;veis pico obtidas durante o TECP: VO<sub>2</sub>, FC, % da FC m&#225;xima predita, delta da FC, PA sist&#243;lica, duplo produto, pulso de oxig&#234;nio e o OUES. Al&#233;m disso, maiores valores de PA diast&#243;lica pico e do VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>  <italic>slope</italic> foram observados no GDAC. N&#227;o podemos deixar de ressaltar que a presen&#231;a de tratamento farmacol&#243;gico, como inibidores da enzima conversora de angiotensina, os diur&#233;ticos e em especial os betabloqueadores, pode ter contribu&#237;do para as respostas apresentadas pelo GDAC durante o TECP, uma vez que esse grupo apresentou menores valores pico de PA sist&#243;lica, FC e VO<sub>2</sub> em rela&#231;&#227;o ao GC; adicionalmente, durante o teste de exerc&#237;cio m&#225;ximo/sintoma-limitado (pr&#233;vio ao TECP) a terapia farmacol&#243;gica do GDAC foi suspensa e assim pudemos observar que esses apresentaram valores de FC pico maiores (aproximadamente 7%) em rela&#231;&#227;o aos valores obtidos durante o TECP, na qual todos os sujeitos do GDAC estavam sob o efeito de terapia farmacol&#243;gica.</p>
          <p>Embora esses f&#225;rmacos possam ter influenciado nossos achados, eles s&#227;o considerados terapia mandat&#243;ria para essa popula&#231;&#227;o<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref> e, em especial, a retirada dos betabloqueadores pode aumentar o risco de eventos card&#237;acos<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>. &#201; importante considerar que por meio de uma an&#225;lise de regress&#227;o pelo m&#233;todo <italic>stepwise</italic> observamos que a terapia farmacol&#243;gica influenciou o VO<sub>2</sub> pico e a PA sist&#243;lica pico (VO<sub>2</sub> presente na f&#243;rmula da PC e a PA sist&#243;lica presente nas f&#243;rmulas da PC e PV), mas n&#227;o influenciou diretamente na PC e PV; al&#233;m disso, por meio dessa mesma an&#225;lise observamos que o grupo influenciou o VO<sub>2</sub> pico, o VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>  <italic>slope</italic>, a PC e PV, enquanto o n&#250;mero de vasos com estenose ap&#243;s o tratamento influenciou a PV. Dessa maneira acreditamos que os menores valores da PC e PV apresentados pelo GDAC durante o TECP est&#227;o relacionados n&#227;o s&#243; &#224; terapia farmacol&#243;gica, mas tamb&#233;m ao n&#237;vel de capacidade funcional aer&#243;bia e &#224;s caracter&#237;sticas da DAC, e que os menores valores da PV podem tamb&#233;m estar relacionados ao n&#250;mero de vasos com estenose remanescente p&#243;s tratamento.</p>
          <p>Uma forma de quantificar a <italic>performance</italic> durante o exerc&#237;cio &#233; por meio da avalia&#231;&#227;o do VO<sub>2</sub> pico, e no presente estudo o menor valor dessa vari&#225;vel observada no GDAC refor&#231;a o papel da DAC nas piores respostas encontradas durante o TECP<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>, na qual esteve tamb&#233;m diretamente relacionada &#224; inefici&#234;ncia ventilat&#243;ria observada nesse grupo (maior valor do VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>  <italic>slope</italic> e menor valor do OUES). Maiores valores do VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>  <italic>slope</italic> est&#227;o frequentemente relacionados a um pior perfil hemodin&#226;mico pulmonar e ao aumento da ativa&#231;&#227;o dos quimiorreceptores e ergorreceptores, bem como &#224; modula&#231;&#227;o auton&#244;mica e a fun&#231;&#227;o cardiovascular diminu&#237;das<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B07">7</xref>. Menores valores do OUES indicam que a extra&#231;&#227;o e a utiliza&#231;&#227;o do oxig&#234;nio est&#227;o prejudicadas, pois essa vari&#225;vel est&#225; fortemente correlacionada com o VO<sub>2</sub><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B03">3</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B04">4</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>. Al&#233;m disso, observamos no presente estudo que o duplo produto e o pulso de oxig&#234;nio foram menores no GDAC em rela&#231;&#227;o ao GC no pico do TECP. O duplo produto tem sido considerado importante par&#226;metro na avalia&#231;&#227;o da fun&#231;&#227;o ventricular, e altos valores no pico do esfor&#231;o s&#227;o comumente relacionados a uma boa fun&#231;&#227;o ventricular e aus&#234;ncia de isquemia<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>. Em adi&#231;&#227;o, o pulso de oxig&#234;nio reflete a quantidade de oxig&#234;nio consumida por batimento card&#237;aco, com isso avalia a efici&#234;ncia do sistema cardiovascular podendo promover informa&#231;&#227;o progn&#243;stica em pacientes com DAC<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>.</p>
          <p>Outro interessante e novo achado deste estudo foi que sujeitos com menores valores de VO<sub>2</sub> pico apresentaram menores valores dos &#237;ndices da PC e PV, e esses se correlacionaram com a classifica&#231;&#227;o funcional aer&#243;bia de acordo com a AHA<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>. Um estudo prospectivo recente<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref> que avaliou a associa&#231;&#227;o entre par&#226;metros do teste de exerc&#237;cio e todas as causas de mortalidade em pacientes com doen&#231;a cardiovascular pr&#233;via mostrou que uma pior toler&#226;ncia ao exerc&#237;cio (avaliada por meio do tempo de dura&#231;&#227;o do exerc&#237;cio em rela&#231;&#227;o ao predito) est&#225; associada com maior risco de mortalidade. Em nosso estudo transversal observamos que os &#237;ndices da PC e PV foram correlacionados positivamente (correla&#231;&#227;o moderada e forte, respectivamente) com a classifica&#231;&#227;o funcional aer&#243;bia avaliada por meio da medida do VO<sub>2</sub> pico.</p>
          <p>Cohen-Solal e cols.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref> avaliaram longitudinalmente (acompanhamento m&#233;dio de 25 &#177; 10 meses) 175 pacientes com insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca, submetidos a um TECP incremental; os autores mostraram que a PC foi preditora de progn&#243;stico. Al&#233;m disso, os autores refor&#231;am que particularmente em sujeitos com baixo valor de VO<sub>2</sub> pico e PA sist&#243;lica pico a combina&#231;&#227;o das respostas dessas vari&#225;veis durante o exerc&#237;cio (por meio do &#237;ndice da PC) fortalece o valor progn&#243;stico do TECP. Similarmente ao estudo pr&#233;vio, Forman e cols.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref> avaliaram o uso progn&#243;stico da PV em um estudo longitudinal (acompanhamento m&#233;dio de quatro anos) com 875 pacientes com insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca submetidos a um TECP; os autores mostraram que a PV foi preditora independente de eventos card&#237;acos, maior do que os &#237;ndices comumente utilizados no TECP (isto &#233;, o VO<sub>2</sub> pico e o VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>  <italic>slope</italic>), e por meio de uma an&#225;lise multivariada os autores observaram que a PC e PV avaliadas em conjunto promovem um maior poder progn&#243;stico. Embora as vari&#225;veis tradicionais obtidas pelo TECP, como o VO<sub>2</sub>, a PA sist&#243;lica e o VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>  <italic>slope</italic>, reflitam a capacidade aer&#243;bia, o controle hemodin&#226;mico e a efici&#234;ncia ventilat&#243;ria respectivamente para a produ&#231;&#227;o de di&#243;xido de carbono, a PC e PV s&#227;o &#237;ndices que combinam essas vari&#225;veis. A PC avalia os componentes central e perif&#233;rico do trabalho card&#237;aco, dessa forma ambos promovem importante informa&#231;&#227;o em rela&#231;&#227;o a severidade da doen&#231;a e progn&#243;stico, j&#225; a PV &#233; um &#237;ndice que combina a avalia&#231;&#227;o do sistema hemodin&#226;mico com a efici&#234;ncia ventilat&#243;ria durante o exerc&#237;cio<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>.</p>
          <p>Recentemente, Borghi-Silva e cols.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>avaliaram a rela&#231;&#227;o entre a PV e as principais vari&#225;veis obtidas por meio da ecocardiografia com Doppler em pacientes com insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca e fra&#231;&#227;o de eje&#231;&#227;o reduzida; os autores mostraram que menores valores da PV traduzem um fen&#243;tipo muito desfavor&#225;vel caracterizado por um baixo valor de VO<sub>2</sub> e baixa resposta do d&#233;bito card&#237;aco. O presente estudo &#233; do tipo transversal com o objetivo de caracterizar os &#237;ndices PC e PV em um grupo com DAC sem insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca tratado por meio de f&#225;rmacos, angioplastia coronariana ou cirurgia de revasculariza&#231;&#227;o do mioc&#225;rdio. Nossos achados mostraram que os &#237;ndices da PC e PV est&#227;o alterados em pacientes com DAC quando comparado aos de sujeitos saud&#225;veis e est&#227;o relacionados n&#227;o somente &#224; terapia farmacol&#243;gica, mas tamb&#233;m ao n&#237;vel de capacidade funcional aer&#243;bia e as caracter&#237;sticas da DAC. Al&#233;m disso, os menores valores da PV est&#227;o relacionados ao n&#250;mero de vasos com estenose p&#243;s-tratamento. Assim, estudos futuros s&#227;o necess&#225;rios a fim de determinar o uso progn&#243;stico de ambos os &#237;ndices em pacientes com DAC sem insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca e assim determinar se ambos os &#237;ndices atuam de forma semelhante ao que tem sido encontrado em pacientes com insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref> </p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Limita&#231;&#245;es do estudo</title>
          <p>Esta investiga&#231;&#227;o &#233; caracterizada pela explora&#231;&#227;o inicial dos &#237;ndices da PC e PV em homens com DAC sem insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca e, como qualquer estudo, apresenta algumas limita&#231;&#245;es. Em primeiro lugar, embora a literatura<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref> indique que os &#237;ndices da PC e PV s&#227;o considerados marcadores de progn&#243;stico em pacientes com insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca, a natureza transversal e o tamanho amostral relativamente pequeno do presente estudo n&#227;o nos permite expandir a utilidade progn&#243;stica de ambos os &#237;ndices. Portanto, avalia&#231;&#245;es prospectivas adicionais nessa popula&#231;&#227;o s&#227;o necess&#225;rias para utiliza&#231;&#227;o desses &#237;ndices como marcadores progn&#243;stico. Em rela&#231;&#227;o &#224; fun&#231;&#227;o card&#237;aca, o grupo DAC foi caracterizado somente pela fra&#231;&#227;o de eje&#231;&#227;o ventricular esquerda, pois 50% da amostra foram avaliados por ventriculografia e 50%, por ecocardiograma. Mulheres n&#227;o foram inclu&#237;das neste estudo, pois a faixa et&#225;ria selecionada poderia incluir tanto mulheres com ciclo menstrual regular (com e sem uso de anticoncepcionais) como mulheres na fase p&#243;s&#8209;menopausa (com e sem uso de terapia de reposi&#231;&#227;o hormonal), e essas diferen&#231;as poderiam influenciar nossos resultados<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref><sup>,</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>. Embora a terapia farmacol&#243;gica utilizada para o tratamento da hipertens&#227;o arterial sist&#234;mica na popula&#231;&#227;o com DAC do presente estudo, dentre elas os inibidores da enzima conversora de angiotensina, os diur&#233;ticos e betabloqueadores, possam ter influenciado nos menores valores dos &#237;ndices da PC e PV presente no GDAC deste estudo, bem como nos outros &#237;ndices obtidos atrav&#233;s do TECP, a cessa&#231;&#227;o desses medicamentos n&#227;o seria poss&#237;vel uma vez que essa terapia &#233; considerada mandat&#243;ria para alguns pacientes; estudos futuros incluindo um grupo controle composto de sujeitos com hipertens&#227;o arterial sist&#234;mica mas sem DAC (com terapia farmacol&#243;gica similar dos sujeitos com DAC do presente estudo) poderia eliminar a poss&#237;vel influ&#234;ncia desses f&#225;rmacos nas vari&#225;veis estudadas.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="conclusions">
        <title>Conclus&#245;es</title>
        <p>Os &#237;ndices da PC e PV apresentaram-se menores em homens com DAC sem insufici&#234;ncia card&#237;aca. Tratados por meio de f&#225;rmacos, de angioplastia coronariana ou de cirurgia de revasculariza&#231;&#227;o do mioc&#225;rdio em rela&#231;&#227;o ao GC, mostrando uma pior resposta da fun&#231;&#227;o cardiopulmonar. Desta maneira, tanto a PC quanto a PV podem ter valor na triagem desta popula&#231;&#227;o, na avalia&#231;&#227;o da signific&#226;ncia funcional da doen&#231;a, na toler&#226;ncia ao exerc&#237;cio e consequentemente auxiliar na prescri&#231;&#227;o do treinamento f&#237;sico, sendo utilizadas individualmente ou complementarmente &#224; outros &#237;ndices derivados do TECP. Uma an&#225;lise multivariada, considerando &#237;ndices relacionados tanto com a fun&#231;&#227;o central quanto com a perif&#233;rica preveem uma avalia&#231;&#227;o mais abrangente da fisiologia do esfor&#231;o. Futuras investiga&#231;&#245;es s&#227;o necess&#225;rias a fim de avaliar se os valores da PC e PV mais baixos observados no presente estudo s&#227;o relacionados apenas &#224; DAC ou ao uso de terapia farmacol&#243;gica e, tamb&#233;m verificar o valor progn&#243;stico desses &#237;ndices nesta popula&#231;&#227;o.</p>
      </sec>
    </body>
    <back>
      <fn-group>
        <fn fn-type="supported-by">
          <p>
            <bold>Fontes de financiamento</bold>
          </p>
          <p>O presente estudo foi financiado por Funda&#231;&#227;o de Amparo &#224; Pesquisa do Estado de S&#227;o Paulo (FAPESP), S&#227;o Paulo/SP/Brasil (processo: 2010/52070-4); Coordena&#231;&#227;o de Aperfei&#231;oamento de Pessoal de N&#237;vel Superior (CAPES), Bras&#237;lia/DF/Brasil; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient&#237;fico e Tenol&#243;gico (CNPq), Bras&#237;lia/DF/Brasil (processo: 483945/2007-2).</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="other">
          <p>
            <bold>Vincula&#231;&#227;o acad&#234;mica</bold>
          </p>
          <p>Este artigo &#233; parte de tese de Doutorado de Viviane Castello Sim&#245;es pela Universidade Federal de S&#227;o Carlos.</p>
        </fn>
      </fn-group>
      <ack>
        <title>Agradecimentos</title>
        <p>Os autores agradecem aos pacientes pelo esfor&#231;o, entusiasmo e coopera&#231;&#227;o durante o per&#237;odo de coleta e aos m&#233;dicos S&#233;rgio Luiz Berti e Jo&#227;o Or&#225;vio de Freitas Jr. pelo suporte com os pacientes da sess&#227;o hemodin&#226;mica da Santa Casa de Miseric&#243;rdia de S&#227;o Carlos/SP/Brasil. Adicionalmente, agradecemos &#224; m&#233;dica Isabela Arruda Verzola Aniceto pela realiza&#231;&#227;o das avalia&#231;&#245;es cl&#237;nicas dos volunt&#225;rios.</p>
      </ack>
    </back>
  </sub-article>
</article>
